Tricked or troubled natures?. How to make sense of " climategate"

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 28, Issue , 2013, Pages 92-99

  Skrydstrup, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

" Climategate"; Communication of science; Conceptualizations of nature; Science and society; The science of climate change

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLIMATE; NATURAL SCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84876427833     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AAAS AAAS Reaffirms Statements on Climate Change and Integrity 2009, Retrieved 4 December 2009.
2. Adams D. Scientists Cleared of Malpractice in UEA's Hacked Emails Inquiry 2010, The Guardian, London.
3. AGU American Geophysical Union News: AGU Statement Regarding the Recent Release of E-mails 2009, Retrieved 8 December 2009.
4. AMS Impact of CRU Hacking on the AMS Statement on Climate Change 2009, Retrieved 25 November 2009.
5. Begley S. James Hansen: Climate Change Evidence 'Overwhelming,' Hacked E-mails 'Indicate Poor Judgement'. Newsweek 2009.
6. Crutzen P.J., Stoermer E.F. The 'Anthropocene'. Global Change Newsletter 2000, 41:17-18.
7. Eilperin J. Hackers Steal Electronic Data from Top Climate Research Center 2009, Washington Post, Washington, DC.
8. EPA EPA Rejects Claims of Flawed Climate Science 2010, Retrieved July 29 2010.
9. EPA Myths vs. Facts: Denial of Petitions for Reconsideration of the Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act 2011, Retrieved 14 April 2011.
10. Gillis J. British Panel Clears Climate Scientists 2010, The New York Times, New York City.
11. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, P. o. t. U. K., 2010. The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. London, pp. 52-54.
12. House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee S. Official Shorthand Writers to the Houses of Parliament: Uncorrected Oral Evidence, 1 March 2010, The Disclosure of Climate Data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, HC 387-i 2010, Retrieved 31 March 2010.
13. IPCC Statement by Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on Stolen Emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom 2009, IPCC.
14. Johnson K. Lawmakers Probe Climate Emails 2009, Wall Street Journal, New York City.
15. Jones, P., 2009. CRU Update 3. Retrieved Archived from the original on 5 December 2009. Retrieved 5 December 2009, 1 December 2009.
16. Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern 1991, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Latour B. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy 2004, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Morello L. Stolen E-Mails Sharpen a Brawl Between Climate Scientists and Skeptics 2009, The New York Times, New York City.
19. Pachauri, R.K., Reisinger, A., 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. Pielke R. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Revkin A. Your Dot: On Science and Cyber-Terrorism 2009, The New York Times, New York City.
22. Satter R.G. 'Climategate' inquiry largely clears scientists 2010, Seattle Times, Seattle.
23. Snow C.P. The Two Cultures 2001 [1959], Cambridge University Press, London.
24. Stahnke J., Wyssuwa M. Klima-Gate. Frankfurter Algemeriner Zeitung. Frankfurt am Main 2009.
25. Weber M. Science as a Vocation. From Max Weber 1946, Oxford University Press, New York. H. Gerth, C. Wright Mills (Eds.).
26. Wynne B. Strange weather again: climate science as political act. Theory Culture Society 2010, 27(2-3):289-305.