A randomized trial of mogen clamp versus plastibell for neonatal male circumcision in Botswana

Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Plank, Rebeca M ^a,b,c   Ndubuka, Nnamdi O ^c   Wirth, Kathleen E ^b,c   Mwambona, Janet T ^d   Kebaabetswe, Poloko ^e   Bassil, Barbara ^d   Lesetedi, Chiapo ^d   Magetse, Jane ^c   Nkgau, Maggie ^c   Makhema, Joseph ^c   Mmalane, Mompati ^c   Creek, Tracy ^f   Powis, Kathleen M ^b,c,f   Shapiro, Roger ^b,c,g   Lockman, Shahin ^a,b,c  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c BOTSWANA HARVARD AIDS INSTITUTE PARTNERSHIP   (Botswana)

^d Department of HIV AIDS Prevention and Care   (Botswana)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA   (Botswana)

^f MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center   (Israel)

Author keywords

Botswana; HIV prevention; Male circumcision; Mogen clamp; Neonatal circumcision; Plastibell

Indexed keywords

EMLA;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BOTSWANA; CIRCUMCISION; CLAMP; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFANCY; INFANT; INFECTION; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE; MOGEN CLAMP; MOTHER; NEWBORN PERIOD; PARENT; PENIS GLANS; PLASTIBELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; SATISFACTION; SKIN; STAFF; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BOTSWANA; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MOTHERS; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84876412593     PISSN: 15254135     EISSN: 10779450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318285d449     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e298.
2. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:643-656.
3. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007; 369:657-666.
4. WHO. New data on male circumcision and HIV prevention: policy and programme implications. http://www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/MCrecommendations-en. pdf. 2007.
5. Weiss HA, Larke N, Halperin D, et al. Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2010;10:2.
6. UNAIDS. Neonatal and Child Male Circumcision: A Global Review. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2010.
7. Plank RM, Makhema J, Kebaabetswe P, et al. Acceptability of infant male circumcision as part of HIV prevention and male reproductive health efforts in Gaborone, Botswana, and surrounding areas. AIDS Behav. 2010;14:1198-1202.
8. Kurtis PS, DeSilva HN, Bernstein BA, et al. A comparison of the Mogen and Gomco clamps in combination with dorsal penile nerve block in minimizing the pain of neonatal circumcision. Pediatrics. 1999;103:E23.
9. Kaufman GE, Cimo S, Miller LW, et al. An evaluation of the effects of sucrose on neonatal pain with 2 commonly used circumcision methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:564-568.
10. Plank RM, Kubiak DW, Abdullahi RB, et al. Loss of anatomical landmarks with eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream for neonatal male circumcision. J Pediatr Urol. 2012.
11. Taddio A. Pain management for neonatal circumcision. Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3:101-111.
12. Brady-Fryer B, Wiebe N, Lander JA. Pain relief for neonatal circumcision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004: CD004217.
13. Blass EM, Hoffmeyer LB. Sucrose as an analgesic for newborn infants. Pediatrics. 1991;87:215-218.
14. Ben Chaim J, Livne PM, Binyamini J, et al. Complications of circumcision in Israel: a one year multicenter survey. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7: 368-370.
15. Naimer SA, Trattner A. Are sterile conditions essential for all forms of cutaneous surgery? The case of ritual neonatal circumcision. J Cutan Med Surg. 2000;4:177-180.
16. WHO. Manual for Early Infant Male Circumcision Under Local Anaesthesia. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services; 2011.
17. Plank RM, Ndubuka N, Mwambona J, et al. Neonatal male circumcision in Gaborone, Botswana, and surrounding areas: uptake and outcomes. 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston, MA, 2011.
18. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics. 1989;83:1011-1015.
19. Botswana-MOH. Botswana AIDS Impact Survey III. In: Office CS, ed. Gaborone, Botswana; 2009.
20. Waters E, Li M, Mugisa B, et al. Acceptability and uptake of neonatal male circumcision in Lusaka, Zambia. AIDS Behav. 2012.
21. Bode CO, Ikhisemojie S, Ademuyiwa AO. Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6:23-27.
22. Cairns JT. Circumcision: a minor procedure? Paediatr Child Health. 2007;12:311-312.
23. Neulander E, Walfisch S, Kaneti J. Amputation of distal penile glans during neonatal ritual circumcision-a rare complication. Br J Urol. 1996;77:924-925.
24. Young MR, Bailey RC, Odoyo-June E, et al. Safety of over twelve hundred infant male circumcisions using the Mogen clamp in Kenya. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47395.
25. Pippi Salle JL, Jesus LE, Lorenzo AJ, et al. Glans amputation during routine neonatal circumcision: mechanism of injury and strategy for prevention. J Pediatr Urol. 2012.
26. Taeusch HW, Martinez AM, Partridge JC, et al. Pain during Mogen or PlastiBell circumcision. J Perinatol. 2002;22:214-218.
27. Young MR, Odoyo-June E, Nordstrom SK, et al. Factors associated with uptake of infant male circumcision for HIV prevention in Western Kenya. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e175-e182.
28. Mavhu W, Hatzold K, Laver SM, et al. Acceptability of early infant male circumcision as an HIV prevention intervention in Zimbabwe: a qualitative perspective. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32475.