Interobserver agreement for confocal imaging of ampullary lesions: A multicenter single-blinded study

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 440-442

  Bakhru, Mihir R ^a   Sethi, Amrita ^b   Jamidar, Priya A ^d   Singh, Satish K ^e   Kwon, Richard S ^g   Siddiqui, Uzma D ^d   Sawhney, Mandeep ^f   Talreja, Jayant P ^a   Kline, Pamela ^c   Malik, Umer ^c   Gaidhane, Monica ^c   Sauer, Bryan G ^a   Kahaleh, Michel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^d Department of Gastroenterology ^*  (United States)

^e BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

ampullary lesions; interobserver agreement; pCLE; probe based confocal laser endomicroscopy

Indexed keywords

AMPULLARY LESION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM INJURY; EPITHELIUM; GOBLET CELL; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; AMPULLA OF VATER; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 84876410527     PISSN: 01920790     EISSN: 15392031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182745f2b     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Defrain C, Chang CY, Srikureja W, et al. Cytologic features and diagnostic pitfalls of primary ampullary tumors by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer. 2005;105:289-297
2. Hornick JR, Johnston FM, Simon PO, et al. A singleinstitution review of 157 patients presenting with benign and malignant tumors of the ampulla of Vater: Management and outcomes. Surgery. 2011;150:169-176
3. Noor MT, Vaiphei K, Nagi B, et al. Role of needle knife assisted ampullary biopsy in the diagnosis of periampullary carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;3:220-224
4. Adler DG, Qureshi W, Davila R, et al. The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:849-854
5. Chen CH, Yang CC, Yeh YH, et al. Reappraisal of endosonography of ampullary tumors: Correlation with transabdominal sonography, CT, and MRI. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:18-25
6. Kahaleh M, Shami VM, Brock A, et al. Factors predictive of malignancy and endoscopic resectability in ampullary neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2335-2339
7. Wallace MB, Fockens P. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1509-1513
8. Othman MO, Wallace MB. Confocal laser endomicroscopy: Is it prime time? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:205-206
9. Skordilis P, Mouzas IA, Dimoulios PD, et al. Is endosonography an effective method for detection and local staging of the ampullary carcinoma? A prospective study. BMC Surg. 2002;2:1
10. Yamaguchi K, Enjoji M, Kitamura K. Endoscopic biopsy has limited accuracy in diagnosis of ampullary tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:588-592
11. Wallace M, Lauwers GY, Chen Y, et al. Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy. 2011;43:882-891
12. De Palma GD. Confocal laser endomicroscopy in the "in vivo" histological diagnosis of the gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5770-5775
13. Meining A, Chen YK, Pleskow D, et al. Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: A multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:961-968
14. Hurlstone DP, Thomson M, Brown S, et al. Confocal endomicroscopy in ulcerative colitis: Differentiating dysplasiaassociated lesional mass and adenoma-like mass. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1235-1241
15. Giovannini M, Bories E, Monges G, et al. Results of a phase I-II study on intraductal confocal microscopy (IDCM) in patients with common bile duct (CBD) stenosis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2247-2253
16. De Palma GD, Staibano S, Siciliano S, et al. In-vivo characterization of DALM in ulcerative colitis with highresolution probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:677-680
17. Talreja JP, Sethi A, Jamidar PA, et al. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of indeterminate biliary strictures: A multi-center comparison. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(suppl):AB126
18. Lim LG, Yeoh KG, Salto-Tellez M, et al. Experienced versus inexperienced confocal endoscopists in the diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma and intestinal metaplasia on confocal images. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1141-1147
19. Wallace MB, Sharma P, Lightdale C, et al. Preliminary accuracy and interobserver agreement for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus with probebased confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:19-24
20. Gomez V, Buchner AM, Dekker E, et al. Interobserver agreement and accuracy among international experts with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in predicting colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42:286-291