Challenges in peer-to-peer gaming

Computer Communication Review

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 79-82

  Neumann, Christoph ^a   Prigent, Nicolas ^b   Varvello, Matteo ^c   Suh, Kyoungwon ^d  

^a Thomson Research   (France)

^b Thomson Security Research Lab   (France)

^c EURECOM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Overlay Online gaming; Peer to Peer; Security

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION MODELS; DEPLOYMENT COSTS; FAST DEPLOYMENTS; MULTI-PLAYER ONLINE GAMES; OVERLAY ONLINE-GAMING; PEER TO PEER; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SECURITY;

COMMUNICATION;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 84876359618     PISSN: 01464833     EISSN: 19435819     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1198255.1198269     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. An Analysis of MMOG Subscription Growth web site. http://www.mmogchart. com/.
2. N. E. Baughman, M. Liberatore, and B. N. Levine. Cheat-proof playout for centralized and peer-to-peer gaming. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. To appear.
3. M. Castro, P. Druschel, A.-M. Kermarrec, and A. Rowstron. Scribe: A large-scale and decentralised application-level multicast infrastructure. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication (JSAC), 20(8), 2002.
4. L. Gautier and C. Diot. Design and evaluation of mimaze, a multi-player game in the internet. In Proceedings of IEEE Multimedia Systems Conference, June 1998.
5. L. Gautier, C. Diot, and J. Kurose. End-to-end transmission control mechanisms for multiparty interactive applications on the internet. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'99, Mar. 1999.
6. T. Iimura, H. Hazeyama, and Y. Kadobayashi. Zoned federation of game servers: a peer-to-peer approach to scalable multi-player online games. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2004 workshops on NetGames '04, pages 116-120, New York, NY, USA, September 2004.
7. A. S. John and B. N. Levine. Supporting p2p gaming when players have heterogeneous resources. In Proceedings of NOSSDAV '05, June 2005.
8. B. Knutsson, H. Lu, W. Xu, and B. Hopkins. Peer-to-peer support for massively multiplayer games. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'04, March 2004.
9. B. N. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. F. Kurose. Consideration of receiver interest for ip multicast delivery. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'00, Mar. 2000.
10. D. of Defense. Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria (The Orange Book), Dec. 1985. DoD 5200.28-STD.
11. M. Pullen, M. Myjak, and C. Bouwens. Limitations of Internet protocol suite for distributed simulation in the large mulitcast environment, Feb. 1999. Request For Comments 2502.
12. A. Rowstron and P. Druschel. Pastry: Scalable, distributed object location and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In Proceedings of the IFIP/ACM International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms (Middleware), November 2001.
13. B. Wietrzyk and M. Radenkovic. Enabling rapid and cost-effective creation of massive pervasive games in vey unstable environments. In IEEE/IFIP WONS 2007, January 2007.
14. J. Yan and B. Randell. A systematic classification of cheating in online games. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on NetGames'05, October 2005.
15. A. P. Yu and S. T. Vuong. Mopar: a mobile peer-to-peer overlay architecture for interest management of massively multiplayer online games. In Proceedings of NOSSDAV '05, pages 99-104, june 2005.