Can we have fun @ work? the role of intrinsic motivation for utilitarian systems

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 360-380

  Gerow, Jennifer E ^a   Ayyagari, Ramakrishna ^b   Thatcher, Jason Bennett ^c   Roth, Philip L ^c  

^a VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^c CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

hedonic features; intrinsic motivation; MASEM; meta analysis; user acceptance; utilitarian hedonic information systems

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

HEDONIC FEATURES; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; MASEM; META ANALYSIS; USER ACCEPTANCE;

MOTIVATION;

EID: 84876350744     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2012.25     Document Type: Article

References (238)

1. AGARWAL R and KARAHANNA E (2000) Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24(4), 665-694.
2. AHN K and KIM J (2010) Ubiquitous tour information: the relationships between service quality, perceived enjoyment, and behavioral intention. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) pp 1-11, AIS, Lima, Peru.
3. AHN T, RYU S and HAN I (2007) The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information & Management 44(3), 263-275. (Pubitemid 46705539)
4. AMOAKO-GYAMPAH K (2007) Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in Human Behavior 23(3), 1232-1248. (Pubitemid 46073573)
5. AMOROSO DL, DEMBLA P, WANG H, GREINER M and LIU P (2008) Understanding music sharing behavior in china: development of an instrument. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) pp 1-10, AIS, Toronto, ON, Canada.
6. ANANDARAJAN M, SIMMERS C and IGBARIA M (2000) An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impact of Internet usage: an individual perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 19(1), 69-85. (Pubitemid 35393598)
7. AUGER P (2005) The impact of interactivity and design sophistication on the performance of commercial websites for small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 43(2), 119-137. (Pubitemid 41648037)
8. AXELROD L and HONE KS (2006) Affectemes and allaffects: a novel approach to coding user emotional expression during interactive experiences. Behaviour & Information Technology 25(2), 159-173. (Pubitemid 43065345)
9. BARON RM and KENNY DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173-1182.
10. BEAUDRY A and PINSONNEAULT A (2010) The other side of acceptance: studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quarterly 34(4), 689-710.
11. BENTLER PM and BONETT DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88(3), 588-606.
12. BOBKO P and ROTH PL (2003) Meta-analysis and validity generalization as research tools: issues of sample bias and degrees of mis-specification. In Validity Generalization: A Critical Review (MURPHY KR, Ed.), pp 67-90, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
13. BOCK GSR and QIAN Z (2008) The effect of social context on the success of knowledge repository systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55(4), 536-551.
14. BRANDYBERRY AA, LI X and LIN L (2010) Determinants of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in individual adoption of social network sites. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) pp 1-11, AIS, Lima, Peru.
15. BROWN SA and VENKATESH V (2005) Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 399-426. (Pubitemid 46063136)
16. BYRNE BM (2006) Structural Equation Modeling With EQS. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
17. CELIK H (2008) What determines Turkish customers' acceptance of internet banking? International Journal of Bank Marketing 26(5), 353-370.
18. CHANDRA S, SRIVASTAVA S and THENG YL (2009) Role of cognitive absorption and trust for collaboration in virtual world. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp 1-13, AIS, Hyderabad, India.
19. CHANG HH (2008) Intelligent agent's technology characteristics applied to online auctions' task: a combined model of TTF and TAM. Technovation 28(9), 564-577.
20. CHANG HH (2010) Task-technology fit and user acceptance of online auction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(1-2), 69-89.
21. CHATZOGLOU PD, SARIGIANNIDIS L, VRAIMAKI E and DIAMANTIDIS A (2009) Investigating Greek employees' intention to use web-based training. Computers & Education 53(3), 877-889.
22. CHILDERS TL, CARR CL, PECK J and CARSON S (2001) Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing 77(4), 511-535.
23. CHITTURI R, RAGHUNATHAN R andMAHAJAN V (2008) Delight by design: the role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing 72(3), 48-63.
24. CHU C and LU H (2007) Factors influencing online music purchase intention in Taiwan: an empirical study based on the value-intention framework. Internet Research 17(2), 139-155.
25. COCKTON G (2002) Editorial: from doing to being: bringing emotion into interaction. Interacting with Computers 14(2), 89-92. (Pubitemid 34199153)
26. COCOSILA M and ARCHER N (2010) Adoption of mobile ICT for health promotion: an empirical investigation. Electronic Markets 20(3-4), 241-250.
27. COCOSILA M, ARCHER N and YUAN Y (2007) Adoption of SMS for businessto-consumer usage: supporting adherence to healthy activities. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-10, AIS, Colorado, US.
28. COLLIER JE (2006) Examining customers' intentions to use self-service technology through utilitarian and hedonic value judgments. In Business Administration, pp 1-233, University of Memphis,Memphis, TN.
29. CORREA T (2010) The participation divide among 'online experts': experience, skills and psychological factors as predictors of college students' web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16(1), 71-92.
30. CYR D, HASSANEIN K, HEAD M and IVANOV A (2007) The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-service environments. Interacting with Computers 19(1), 43-56. (Pubitemid 46091741)
31. CYR D, HEAD M and IVANOV A (2006) Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information & Management 43(8), 950-963. (Pubitemid 44909370)
32. DAVIS FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340.
33. DAVIS FD, BAGOZZI RP and WARSHAW PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8), 982-1003.
34. DAVIS FD, BAGOZZI RP and WARSHAW PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(14), 1111-1132.
35. DAVIS J, LEE L and YI M (2007) Examining the relationships among personality traits, IT-specific traits, and perceived ease of use. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-10, AIS, Colorado.
36. DAVIS JM, LEE LS and YI MY (2009) Time-user preference and technology acceptance: measure development of computer polychronicity. American Journal of Business 24(2), 23-31.
37. DE SOUZA DIAS D (1998) Manager's motivation for using information technology. Industrial Management & Data Systems 98(7-8), 338-342. (Pubitemid 128491639)
38. DENG X, DOLL WJ and TRUONG D (2004) Computer self-efficacy in an ongoing use context. Behaviour & Information Technology 23(6), 395-412.
39. DENNIS AR and WIXOM BH (2001) Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(3), 235-257. (Pubitemid 34048276)
40. DICKINGER A, ARAMI M andMEYER D (2008) The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities. European Journal of Information Systems 17(1), 4-11.
41. ELLIOTT MT and FU FQ (2008) Consumer acceptance of technology products: the impact of tactical selling approaches. Marketing Management Journal 18(2), 47-64.
42. FAGAN MH, NEILL S andWOOLDRIDGE BR (2008) Exploring the intention to use computers: an empirical investigation of the role of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and perceived ease of use. Journal of Computer Information Systems 48(3), 31-37.
43. FULLER J, MUHLBACHER H, MATZLER K and JAWECKI G (2010) Consumer empowerment through internet-based co-creation. Journal of Management Information Systems 26(3), 71-102.
44. GEORGE D, PASSERINI K, HILTZ R, JONES Q and MANIKOPOULOS C (2006) More heads around a screen: pilot findings from a study on the use of tablet PCS to support collaborative learning. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). AIS, Acapulco, Mexico.
45. GEROW JE, GALLUCH P and THATCHER JB (2010) To slack or not to slack: internet usage in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 11(3), 5-24.
46. GLASS GV (1981) Meta-analysis in Social Research. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
47. GOEL L (2008) Situated learning in virtual worlds. In Information Sciences, pp 1-353, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
48. GU JC, FAN L, SUH YH and LEE SC (2010) Comparing utilitarian and hedonic usefulness to user intention in multipurpose information systems. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13(3), 287-297.
49. GUO YM and KLEIN BD (2009) Beyond the test of the four channel model of flow in the context of online shopping. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24(1), 837-856.
50. GUPTA S and KIM HW (2004) Enhancing the commitment to virtual community: a belief and feeling based approach. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 101-114, AIS, Washington DC.
51. HA I, YOON Y and CHOI M (2007) Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management 44(3), 276-286. (Pubitemid 46702399)
52. HA S and STOEL L (2009) Consumer e-shopping acceptance: antecedents in a technology acceptance model. Journal of Business Research 62(5), 565-571.
53. HASSANEIN K and HEAD M (2007) Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(8), 689-708. (Pubitemid 46824073)
54. HE J and KING WR (2008) The role of user participation in information systems development: implications from a meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(1), 301-331.
55. HEERINK M, KROSE B, EVERS V and WIELINGA B (2009) Influence of social presence on acceptance of an assistive social robot and screen agent by elderly users. Advanced Robotics 23(14), 1909-1923.
56. HEILMAN GE (1997) Computer Usage by Small Business Owners/Managers: Toward a More Comprehensive Model, pp 1-196, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
57. HENDERSON R, RICKWOOD D and ROBERTS P (1998) The beta test of an electronic supermarket. Interacting with Computers 10(4), 385-399. (Pubitemid 128638286)
58. HILL SR and TROSHANI I (2009) Adoption of personalisation mobile services: evidence from young Australians. In BLED, pp 117-132, AIS, Golf Bled, Slovenia.
59. HIRSCHMAN EC and HOLBROOK MB (1982) Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing 46(3), 92-101.
60. HOMER PM (2008) Perceived quality and image: when all is not 'rosy'. Journal of Business Research 61(7), 715-723.
61. HONG S and TAM KY (2006) Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: the case of mobile data services. Information Systems Research 17(2), 162-179. (Pubitemid 43877855)
62. HONG S, THONG JYL, MOON JW and TAM KY (2008) Understanding the behavior of mobile data services consumers. Information Systems Frontiers 10(4), 431-445.
63. HSU CL and LIN JCC (2008) Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management 45(1), 65-74.
64. HSU CL and LU HP (2004) Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management 41(7), 853-868.
65. HSU CL and LU HP (2007) Consumer behavior in online game communities: a motivational factor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 23(3), 1642-1659.
66. HSU MH and CHIU CM (2004) Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology 23(5), 359-373.
67. HU L and BENTLER PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1), 1-55.
68. HUANG HM and LIAW SS (2005) Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior 21(5), 729-743.
69. HULL CL (1943) Principles of Behavior. Appleton-CenturyCrofts, New York.
70. HUNTER JE and SCHMIDT FL (1990) Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
71. HUNTER JE and SCHMIDT FL (2004) Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
72. HUR Y (2007) Determinants of sport website acceptance: an application and extension of the technology acceptance model. In College of Education, pp 1-139, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
73. HWANG Y (2005) Investigating the effects of perceived web quality on eTrust, mediated by hedonic needs and anxiety. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 151-156, AIS, Omaha, NE.
74. HWANG Y (2010a) An empirical investigation of normative, affective, and gender influence on e-commerce systems adoption. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-9, AIS, Lima, Peru.
75. HWANG Y (2010b) The moderating effects of gender on e-commerce systems adoption factors: an empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1753-1760.
76. IGBARIA M, IIVARI J and MARAGAHH H (1995) Why do individuals use computer technology? a Finnish case study. Information & Management 29(5), 227-238.
77. IGBARIA M, PARASURAMAN S and BAROUDI JJ (1996) A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems 13(1), 127-143.
78. IVES B (1982) Graphical user interfaces for business information systems. MIS Quarterly 6(4), 15-47.
79. JASHAPARA A and TAI WC (2011) Knowledge mobilization through e-learning systems: understanding the mediating roles of self-efficacy and anxiety on perceptions of ease of use. Information Systems Management 28(1), 71-83.
80. JASPERSON JS, CARTER PE and ZMUD RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 525-557. (Pubitemid 46063140)
81. JIA R, HARTKE H and PEARSON J (2007) Can computer playfulness and cognitive absorption lead to problematic technology usage? In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 1-15, AIS, Montreal, Canada.
82. JIANG Z (2004) An investigation of virtual product experience and its effect mechanism. In School of Business, pp 1-131, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
83. JOSEPH D, NG K, KOH C and ANG S (2007) Turnover of information technology professionals: a narrative review, meta-analytic structural equation modeling, and model development. MIS Quarterly 31(3), 547-577. (Pubitemid 47359824)
84. JUNG Y, PEREZ-MIRA B and WILEY-PATTON S (2009) Consumer adoption of mobile TV: examining psychological flow and media content. Computers in Human Behavior 25(1), 123-129.
85. KAMIS A, STERN T and LADIK DM (2010) A flow-based model of web site intentions when users customize products in business-toconsumer electronic commerce. Information Systems Frontiers 12(2), 157-168.
86. KANG YS, HONG S and LEE H (2009) Exploring continued online service usage behavior: the roles of self-image congruity and regret. Computers in Human Behavior 25(1), 111-122.
87. KANG YS and LEE H (2010) Understanding the role of an IT artifact in online service continuance: an extended perspective of user satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior 26(3), 353-364.
88. KEFI H, MLAIKI A and KALIKA M (2010) Shy people and facebook continuance of usage: does gender matter? In Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp 1-13, AIS, Lima, Peru.
89. KIILI K (2005) Content creation challenges and flow experience in educational games: the IT-emperor case. Internet and Higher Education 8(3), 183-198. (Pubitemid 41252463)
90. KIM B (2010) An empirical investigation of mobile data service continuance: incorporating the theory of planned behavior into the expectation-confirmation model. Expert Systems with Applications 37(10), 7033-7039.
91. KIM GS, PARK SB and OH J (2008) An examination of factors influencing consumer adoption of short message service (SMS). Psychology & Marketing 25(8), 769-786.
92. KING LS (1999) Flow-featured software: an empirical investigation of the effect of a flow-featured, web-based application on the user's flow and software acceptance experiences. In Department of Management Science, pp 1-313, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
93. KING WR (2005) Ensuring ERP implementation success. Information Systems Management 22(3), 83-84. (Pubitemid 40802791)
94. KING WR and HE J (2006) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43(6), 740-755. (Pubitemid 44287241)
95. KLEIN J, MOON Y and PICARD RW (2002) This computer responds to user frustration: theory, design, and results. Interacting with Computers 14(2), 119-140. (Pubitemid 34199155)
96. KO E, KIM EY and LEE EK (2009) Modeling consumer adoption of mobile shopping for fashion products in Korea. Psychology & Marketing 26(7), 669-687.
97. KOH J and KIM S (2007) The effect of e-scape on internet shoppers' cognition, emotion, and behavior response. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 1-18, AIS, Montreal, Canada.
98. KOO DM (2009) The moderating role of locus of control on the links between experiential motives and intention to play online games. Computers in Human Behavior 25(2), 466-474.
99. KORZAAN M and RUTNER P (2003) Intentions to purchase and the online experience. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 314-323, AIS, Tampa, FL.
100. KOUFARIS M (2002) Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research 13(2), 205-223.
101. LAI HM and CHEN CP (2011) Factors influencing secondary school teachers' adoption of teaching blogs. Computers & Education 56(4), 948-960.
102. LANCE CE, BUTTS MM and MICHELS LC (2006) The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria; what did they really say? Organizational Research Methods 9(2), 202-220. (Pubitemid 43907720)
103. LANKTON NK and WILSON EV (2007) Antecedents and dimensions of online service expectations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54(4), 776-788. (Pubitemid 350123910)
104. LAU SH and WOODS PC (2009) Understanding learner acceptance of learning objects: the roles of learning object characteristics and individual differences. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(6), 1059-1075.
105. LEE BC, YOON JO and LEE I (2009a) Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: theories and results. Computers & Education 53(4), 1320-1329.
106. LEE D, MOON J and KIM Y (2007a) The effect of simplicity and perceived control on perceived ease of use. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-16, AIS, Colorado.
107. LEE D, RHEE Y and DUNHAM RB (2009b) The role of organizational and individual characteristics in technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 25(7), 623-646.
108. LEE HH and CHANG E (2011) Consumer attitudes toward online mass customization: an application of extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16(2), 171-200.
109. LEE HH, FIORE AM and KIM J (2006) The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 34(8), 621-644. (Pubitemid 43992794)
110. LEE MKO, CHEUNG CMK and CHEN Z (2005) Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management 42(8), 1095-1104. (Pubitemid 41690943)
111. LEE MKO, CHEUNG CMK and CHEN Z (2007b) Understanding user acceptance of multimedia messaging services: an empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(13), 2066-2077. (Pubitemid 350229709)
112. LEE SM and CHEN L (2010) The impact of flow on online consumer behavior. Journal of Computer Information Systems 50(4), 1-10.
113. LEE Y, KOZAR KA and LARSEN KRT (2003) The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12(50), 752-780.
114. LEGRIS P, INGHAM J and COLLERETTE P (2003) Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40(3), 191-204. (Pubitemid 35412508)
115. LEWIS W (1999) Technology beliefs, belief antecedents, and it usage: a study of the world wide web. In Department of Information and Management Sciences, pp 1-174, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
116. LI D, CHAU PYK and VAN SLYKE C (2010) A comparative study of individual acceptance of instant messaging in the US and China: a structural equation modeling approach. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 26(5), 85-106.
117. LI D, CHUA PYK and LU H (2005) Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: an empirical investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6(4), 102-129.
118. LI X, HSIEH JJPA and RAI A (2009) A motivational account for postacceptance routine and innovative use: introducing the concept of tri-dimensional intrinsic motivation. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 1-20, AIS, Phoenix, AZ.
119. LI X and HSIEH PA (2007) Impact of transformational leadership on system exploration in the mandatory organizational context. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 1-20, Montreal, Canada.
120. LIAW SS and HUANG HM (2003) An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool. Computers in Human Behavior 19(6), 751-765.
121. LIN CP and BHATTACHERJEE A (2010) Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test. Information Systems Journal 20(2), 163-181.
122. LIN CS, WU S and TSAI RJ (2005) Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Information & Management 42(5), 683-693. (Pubitemid 40655113)
123. LIN HF (2009) Examination of cognitive absorption influencing the intention to use a virtual community. Behaviour & Information Technology 28(5), 421-431.
124. LIPSEY MW and WILSON DB (2001) Practical Meta-analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
125. LIU SH, LIAO HL and PRATT JA (2009) Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education 52(3), 599-607.
126. LIU X (2010) Empirical testing of a theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: an exploratory study of educational wikis. Communication Education 59(1), 52-69.
127. LIU Y and LI H (2010) Mobile internet diffusion in china: an empirical study. Industrial Management & Data Systems 110(3), 309-324.
128. LIU Y and LI H (2011) Exploring the impact of use context on mobile hedonic services adoption: an empirical study on mobile gaming in china. Computers in Human Behavior 27(2), 890-898.
129. LOIACONO E, CHEN D and GOODHUE DL (2002) Webqualtm revisited: predicting the intent to reuse a web site. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 301-309, AIS, Dallas, TX.
130. LU HP and SU PYJ (2009) Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites. Internet Research 19(4), 442-458.
131. LU Y, DENG Z and WANG B (2010) Exploring factors affecting Chinese consumers' usage of short message service for personal communication. Information Systems Journal 20(2), 183-208.
132. LU Y, ZHOU T and WANG B (2009) Exploring Chinese users' acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior 25(1), 29-39.
133. LUO MM, REMUS W and CHEA S (2006) Technology acceptance of internet-based information services: an integrated model of tam and U&G theory. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1139-1150, AIS, Acapulco, Mexico.
134. LUO X, GURUNG A and SHIM JP (2010) Understanding the determinants of user acceptance of enterprise instant messaging: an empirical study. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 20(2), 155-181.
135. MACCALLUM RC, BROWNE MW and SUGAWARA HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1(2), 130-149. (Pubitemid 126672841)
136. MACKINNON DP, LOCKWOOD CM, HOFFMAN JM, WEST SG and SHEETS V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 7(1), 83-104.
137. MAHATANANKOON P (2007) The effects of personality traits and optimum stimulation level on text-messaging activities and m-commerce intention. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 12(1), 7-30.
138. MALHOTRA Y, GALLETTA DF and KIRSCH LJ (2008) How endogenous motivations influence user intentions: beyond the dichotomy of extrinsic and intrinsic user motivations. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(1), 267-299.
139. MANTYMAKI M (2009) Customer loyalty in social virtual worlds. In BLED, pp 50-65, AIS, Golf Bled, Slovenia.
140. MARTINEZ-TORRES MR, TORAL MARIN SL, BARRERO GARCIA F, GALLARDO VAZQUEZ S, ARIAS OLIVA M and TORRES T (2008) A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area. Behaviour & Information Technology 27(6), 495-505.
141. MIGUEL M (2004) Web and Paper Questionnaires: An Experimental Comparison, pp 1-74, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
142. MIN G (2006) A policy study on the development of the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry with two empirical studies on mobile data communications service acceptance in China and Hong Kong. In Department of Information and Systems Management, pp 1-208, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
143. MODJESKA DK (2000) Hierarchical data visualization in desktop virtual reality. In Graduate Department of Computer Science, pp 1-192, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
144. MOON J, PU J and LAWRENCE G (2006) The role of virtual social identity through blog use in social life. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 4085-4095, Acapulco, Mexico.
145. MOROSAN C and JEONG M (2008) Users' perceptions of two types of hotel reservation web sites. International Journal of Hospitality Management 27(2), 284-292.
146. MOSIER CI (1943) On the reliability of a weighted composite. Psychometrika 8(3), 161-168.
147. MUN HJ, YUN H, KIM EA, HONG JY and LEE CC (2010) Research on factors influencing intention to use DMB using extended is success model. Information Technology Management 11(3), 143-155.
148. NEWBY M and FISHER D (2000) A model of the relationship between university computer laboratory environment and student outcomes. Learning Environments Research 3(1), 51-66.
149. NOIWAN J and NORCIO AF (2006) Cultural differences on attention and perceived usability: investigating color combinations of animated graphics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(2), 103-122. (Pubitemid 41682004)
150. NYSVEEN H, PEDERSEN PE and THORBJORNSEN H (2005) Intentions to use mobile services: antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33(3), 330-346. (Pubitemid 40977154)
151. OH LB and XU H (2003) Effects of multimedia on mobile consumer behavior: an empirical study of location-aware advertising. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 679-691, AIS, Seattle, WA.
152. OH SH, KIM YM, LEE CW, SHIM GY, PARK MS and JUNG HS (2009) Consumer adoption of virtual stores in Korea: focusing on the role of trust and playfulness. Psychology & Marketing 26(7), 652-668.
153. OKAZAKI S, SKAPA R and GRANDE I (2008) Capturing global youth: mobile gaming in the US, Spain, and the Czech Republic. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(4), 827-855.
154. PARK JH, KONANA P, GU B and LEUNG ACM (2010) An investigation of information sharing and seeking behaviors in virtual communities. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 1-17, AIS, St. Louis, MO.
155. PARK N (2010) Adoption and use of computer-based voice over internet protocol phone service: toward an integrated model. Journal of Communication 60(1), 40-72.
156. PEI D (2006) The role of cognitive absorption in technology acceptance: not all dimensions are created equal. Communication and Information Sciences, pp 1-308, University of Hawai'i, Hawaii, USA.
157. PIANESI F, GRAZIOLA I, ZANCANARO M and GOREN-BAR D (2009) The motivational and control structure underlying the acceptance of adaptive museum guides-an empirical study. Interacting with Computers 21(3), 186-200.
158. PREMKUMAR G, RAMAMURTHY K and LIU HN (2008) Internet messaging: an examination of the impact of attitudinal, normative, and control belief systems. Information & Management 45(7), 451-457.
159. QIU L and BENBASAT I (2009) Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: a social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(4), 145-181.
160. ROCA JC, CHIU CM and JOSE MARTINEZ F (2006) Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(8), 683-696.
161. ROCA JC and GAGNE M (2008) Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: a self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 24(4), 1585-1604. (Pubitemid 351559616)
162. ROSEN PA and KLUEMPER DH (2008) The impact of the big five personality traits on the acceptance of social networking website. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-10, AIS, Toronto, ON, Canada.
163. ROSENTHAL R (1979) The 'file drawer problem' and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86(3), 638-641.
164. ROTH PL, SWITZER FS, VAN IDDEKINGE CH and OH IS (2011) Toward better meta-analytic matrices: how input values can affect research conclusions in human resource management simulations. Personnel Psychology 64(4), 899-935.
165. ROUIBAH K (2008) Social usage of instant messaging by individuals outside the workplace in Kuwait: a structural equation model. Information Technology & People 21(1), 34-68.
166. ROUIBAH K and HAMDY H (2009) Factors affecting information communication technologies usage and satisfaction: perspective from instant messaging in Kuwait. Journal of Global Information Management 17(2), 1-29.
167. RYAN RM and DECI EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: class definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(1), 54-67.
168. RYU MH, KIM S and LEE E (2009) Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user's participation in video UCC services. Computers in Human Behavior 25(3), 619-632.
169. SAADE R and BAHLI B (2005) The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 42(2), 317-327.
170. SAADE RG (2007) Dimensions of perceived usefulness: toward enhanced assessment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 5(2), 289-310.
171. SABHERWAL R, JEYARAJ A and CHOWA C (2006) Information system success: individual and organizational determinants. Management Science 52(12), 1849-1864. (Pubitemid 44927000)
172. SANCHEZ-FRANCO MJ (2006) Exploring the influence of gender on the web usage via partial least squares. Behaviour & Information Technology 25(1), 19-36. (Pubitemid 43065336)
173. SANCHEZ-FRANCO MJ, MARTINEZ-TORRES MR and MARTIN-VELICIA FA (2009) Exploring the impact of individualism and uncertainty avoidance in web-based electronic learning: an empirical analysis in European higher education. Computers & Education 52(3), 588-598.
174. SCHEPERS J and WETZELS M (2007) A meta-analysis of the technology
175. SCHMIDT FL and LE H (2005) Software for the Hunter-schmidt Meta-analysis Methods. University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organization, Iowa City.
176. SCHWAB DL (1999) Research Methods for Organizational Studies. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
177. SERENKO A (2008) A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification. Interacting with Computers 20(4-5), 461-472.
178. SERENKO A, BONTIS N and DETLOR B (2007a) End-user adoption of animated interface agents in everyday work applications. Behaviour & Information Technology 26(2), 119-132. (Pubitemid 46472137)
179. SERENKO A and TUREL O (2007) Are MIS research instruments stable? An exploratory reconsideration of the computer playfulness scale. Information & Management 44(8), 657-665. (Pubitemid 350088332)
180. SERENKO A, TUREL O and BONTIS N (2007b) User acceptance of hedonic information technologies: a perceived value perspective. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-11, AIS, Keystone, CO.
181. SHARMA R and YETTON P (2007) The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly 31(2), 219-238. (Pubitemid 46807161)
182. SHEN J and EDER L (2008) Intentions to use virtual worlds: an exploratory study. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-7, AIS, Toronto, ON, Canada.
183. SHEN J and EDER LB (2009) Exploring intentions to use virtual worlds for business. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 10(2), 94-103.
184. SHIAU WL and LUO MM (2010) Continuance intention of blog users: the impact of perceived enjoyment and user involvement. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), pp 856-867, AIS, Taipei, Taiwan.
185. SHIN DH (2007) User acceptance of mobile internet: implication for convergence technologies. Interacting with Computers 19(4), 472-483.
186. SHIN DH (2009a) Determinants of customer acceptance of multi-service network: an implication for IP-based technologies. Information & Management 46(1), 16-22.
187. SHIN DH (2009b) An empirical investigation of a modified technology acceptance model of IPTV. Behaviour & Information Technology 28(4), 361-372.
188. SHIN DH (2009c) The evaluation of user experience of the virtual world in relation to extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 25(6), 530-553.
189. SHIN DH (2009d) Understanding user acceptance of DMB in South Korea using the modified technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 25(3), 173-198.
190. SHIN DH (2010) The dynamic user activities in massive multiplayer online role-playing games. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26(4), 317-344.
191. SHIN DH and SHIN YJ (2011) Why do people play social network games? Computers in Human Behavior 27(2), 852-861.
192. SKINNER BF (1953) Science of Human Behavior. Macmillan, New York.
193. SLEDGIANOWSKI D and KULVIWAT S (2008) Social network sites: antecedents of user adoption and usage. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-10, AIS, Toronto, ON, Canada.
194. SLEDGIANOWSKI D and KULVIWAT S (2009) Using social network sites: the effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. Journal of Computer Information Systems 49(4), 74-83.
195. SOBEL ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology 13(1), 290-312.
196. SOREBO O, HALVARI H, GULLI VF and KRISTIANSEN R (2009) The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers' motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education 53(4), 1177-1187.
197. SRIVASTAVA SC and CHANDRA S (2010) Examining utilitarian and hedonic factors and their moderators for virtual world collaborations. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-8, AIS, Lima, Peru.
198. SUN H (2010) Sellers' trust and continued use of online marketplaces. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11(4), 182-211.
199. SUN H and ZHANG P (2006) Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: an alternative approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7(9), 618-645.
200. SUN H and ZHANG P (2008a) Adaptive system use: an investigation at the system feature level. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 1-17, AIS, Paris, France.
201. SUN H and ZHANG P (2008b) An exploration of affect factors and their role in user technology acceptance: mediation and causality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(8), 1252-1263.
202. SWITZER FS, PAESE PW and DRASGOW F (1992) Bootstrap estimates of standard errors in validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology 77(2), 123-129.
203. TAN BCY and SAADE R (2008) Cognition and culture in ICT experience. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-9, AIS, Toronto, Canada.
204. TAN FB and CHOU JPC (2008) The relationship between mobile service quality, perceived technology compatibility, and users' perceived playfulness in the context of mobile information and entertainment services. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24(7), 649-671.
205. TAN W (2007) An integrated view of cognitive absorption in a technologymediated learning environment. In School of Business, pp 1-112, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
206. TANG Y and FORSTER P (2007) Exploring the value structure behind mobile auction adoption intention. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-12, AIS, Keystone, CO.
207. TAO YH, CHENG CJ and SUN SY (2009) What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? the Taiwan experience. Computers & Education 53(3), 929-939.
208. TELLER C, REUTTERER T and SCHMEDLITZ P (2008) Hedonic and utilitarian shopper types in evolved and created retail agglomerations. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 18(3), 283-309.
209. TEO TSH (2001) Demographic and motivation variables associated with internet usage activities. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 11(2), 125-137.
210. TERZIS V and ECONOMIDES AA (2011) The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education 56(4), 1032-1044.
211. THEOTOKIS A and DOUKIDIS G (2009) When adoption brings addiction: a use-diffusion model for social information systems. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 1-12, AIS, Phoenix, AZ.
212. TREVINO LK, WEBSTER J and STEIN EW (2000) Making connections: complementary influences on communication media choices attitudes, and use. Organization Science 11(2), 163-182.
213. TUREL O, SERENKO A and BONTIS N (2007) User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: deconstructing perceived value. Information & Management 44(1), 63-73. (Pubitemid 46027483)
214. TUREL O, SERENKO A and BONTIS N (2010) User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: a theory of consumption values perspective. Information & Management 47(1), 53-59.
215. VALLERAND RJ (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In (ZANNA P, Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp 271-374, Academic Press, New York.
216. VAN DER HEIJDEN H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28(4), 695-704.
217. VAN DOLEN WM, DABHOLKAR PA and DE RUYTER K (2007) Satisfaction with online commercial group chat: the influence of perceived technology attributes, chat group characteristics, and advisor communication style. Journal of Retailing 83(3), 339-358.
218. VAN SCHAIK P and LING J (2007) Design parameters of rating scales for web sites. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 14(1), 1-35.
219. VAN SCHAIK P and LING J (2011) An integrated model of interaction experience for information retrieval in a web-based encyclopaedia. Interacting with Computers 23(1), 18-32.
220. VENKATESH V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11(4), 342-365. (Pubitemid 33224535)
221. VENKATESH V and BALA H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 39(2), 273-315.
222. VENKATESH V, MORRIS MG, DAVIS GB and DAVIS FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425-478.
223. VENKATESH V and SPEIER C (1999) Computer technology training in the workplace: a longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79(1), 1-28.
224. VENKATESH V, SPEIER C andMORRIS MG (2002) User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences 33(2), 297-316.
225. WAKEFIELD RL and WHITTEN D (2006) Mobile computing: a user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. European Journal of Information Systems 15(3), 292-300. (Pubitemid 44146928)
226. WANG CY, CHOU ST and CHANG HC (2010a) Exploring an individual's intention to use blogs: the roles of social, motivational and individual factors. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), pp 1656-1663, AIS, Taipei, Taiwan.
227. WANG D, XU L and CHAN HC (2008) Understanding users' continuance of facebook: the role of general and specific computer self-efficacy. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp 1-17, AIS, Paris, France.
228. WANG LC, BAKER J, WAGNER JA and WAKEFIELD K (2007) Can a retail web site be social? Journal of Marketing 71(3), 143-157.
229. WANG M and YEN B (2010) The effects of website personalization on user intention to return through cognitive beliefs and affective reactions. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), pp 1610-1617, AIS, Taipei, Taiwan.
230. WANG T, OH LB, WANG K and ZHANG B (2010b) An empirical study of the impact of trial experiences on the continued usage of mobile newspapers. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), pp 1148-1159, AIS, Taipei, Taiwan.
231. WANG W (2010) How personality affects continuance intention: an empirical investigation of instant messaging. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), pp 1160-1170, AIS, Taipei, Taiwan.
232. WANG YS, WU MC and WANG HY (2009) Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(1), 92-118.
233. WARR P and BUNCE D (1995) Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning. Personnel Psychology 48(2), 347-375.
234. WEBSTER J and MARTOCCHIO JJ (1992) Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly 16(2), 201-226.
235. WU J and LEDERER AL (2009) A meta-analysis of the role of environmentbased voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly 33(2), 419-432.
236. WU J and LI P (2007) Why they enjoy using this gaming application. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), pp 1-14, AIS, Keystone, CO.
237. YI MY and HWANG Y (2003) Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(4), 431-449.
238. ZHOU T and LU Y (2011) Examining mobile instant messaging user loyalty from the perspectives of network externalities and flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior 27(2), 883-889.