Embracing diversity through mixed methods research

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 251-256

  Ågerfalk, Pär J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876349896     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2013.6     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. AGERFALK PJ (2010) Getting pragmatic. European Journal of Information Systems 19(3), 251-256.
2. AGERFALK PJ and ERIKSSON O (2006) Socio-instrumental usability: IT is all about social action. Journal of Information Technology 21(1), 24-39. (Pubitemid 43289768)
3. AGERFALK PJ and FITZGERALD B (2008) Outsourcing to an unknown workforce: exploring opensourcing as an offshore sourcing strategy. MIS Quarterly 32(2), 385-409. (Pubitemid 351762938)
4. AGERFALK PJ, GOLDKUHL G, FITZGERALD B and BANNON L (2006) Reflecting on action in language, organisations and information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 15(1), 4-8. (Pubitemid 43323390)
5. AVITAL M, MATHIASSEN L and SCHULTZE U (2012) Call for papers: European Journal of Information Systems special issue on alternative genres. [WWW document] http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejis/ejis-cfp-alternative-genres.pdf (accessed 7 March 2013).
6. BASKERVILLE R, LYYTINEN K, SAMBAMURTHY V and STRAUB D (2011) A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum. European Journal of Information Systems 20(1), 11-15.
7. CRESWELL JW (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
8. EL AMRANI R, ROWE F and GEFFROY-MARONNAT B (2006) The effects of enterprise resource planning implementation strategy on crossfunctionality. Information Systems Journal 16(1), 79-104. (Pubitemid 43437415)
9. ERIKSSON O and A GERFALK PJ (2010) Rethinking the meaning of identifiers in information infrastructures. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11(8), 433-454.
10. GOLDKUHL G and LYYTINEN K (1982) A language action view on information systems. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Systems (GINZBERGM and ROSS C, Eds), pp 13-29, Ann Arbor, MI. (Pubitemid 14613324)
11. GOLES T and HIRSCHHEIM R (2000) The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead. Long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 28(3), 249-268.
12. GREGOR S and JONES D (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the AIS 8(5), 312-335.
13. HABERMAS J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.
14. HABERMAS J (1998) On the Pragmatics of Communication. MIT Press, Boston, MA.
15. HEVNER AR (2007) A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 87-92.
16. HEVNER AR, MARCH ST, PARK J and RAM S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75-105.
17. HOWE KR (1988) Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis (or dogmas die hard). Educational Researcher 17(1), 10-16.
18. JOHNSON RB and ONWUEGBUZIE AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33(7), 14-26. (Pubitemid 39519587)
19. LATOUR B, JENSEN P, VENTURINI T, GRAUWIN S and BOULLIER D (2012) The whole is always smaller than its parts: a digital test of Gabriel Tardes' monads. The British Journal of Sociology 63(4), 590-615.
20. MILES M and HUBERMAN A (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
21. MINGERS J (2001) Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research 12(3), 240-259.
22. ONWUEGBUZIE AJ and LEECH NL (2005) On becoming a pragmatic researcher: the importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(5), 375-387.
23. ROWE F (2012) Toward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: new categorization and guidelines. European Journal of Information Systems 21(5), 469-478.
24. TEDDLIE C and TASHAKKORI A (2009) Foundations of Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. VENKATESH V, BROWN SA and BALA H (2013) Bridging the qualitative- quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 36(1), 21-54.
26. WINTER R (2008) Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 470-475.
27. ZACHARIADIS M, SCOTT S and MICHAEL B (forthcoming) Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS Quarterly, http://www.misq.org/contents-forthcoming.