The prevalence of incontinence in people with cognitive impairment or dementia living at home: A systematic review

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 314-324

  Drennan, Vari M ^a   Rait, Greta ^b   Cole, Laura ^a   Grant, Robert ^a   Iliffe, Steve ^b  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

community dwelling; dementia; fecal incontinence, prevalence; systematic review; urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

CANADA; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DEMENTIA; FECES INCONTINENCE; HOME CARE; HONG KONG; HUMAN; IRELAND; ITALY; JAPAN; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PREVALENCE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SENESCENCE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DEMENTIA; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HOME CARE AGENCIES; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84876348923     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22333     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Alzheimer's disease International: Global prevalence of dementia: A Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366: 2112-7.
2. Wimo A, Winblad B, Jönsson L,. An estimate of the total worldwide societal costs of dementia in 2005. Alzheimers Dement 2007; 3: 81-91.
3. Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, et al. Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2007; 3: 186-91.
4. European Parliament. European initiative on Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. 2011; www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/FindByProcnum.do?lang= en&procnum=INI/2010/2084
5. Congress of United States of America. National Alzheimer's Project Act S. 3036. 2011; www.kintera.org/site/pp.asp?c=mmKXLbP8E&b=5829219
6. Department of Health. Living Well with Dementia: The National Dementia Strategy. London: The Department of Health; 2008.
7. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. Dementia Plan 2015 (English version). Undated. www.regjeringen.no/upload/HOD/Dokumenter%20KTA/ DementiaPlan2015.pdf.
8. Thomas P, Ingrand P, Lalloue F, et al. Reasons of informal caregivers for institutionalizing dementia patients previously living at home: The Pixel study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 19: 127-35.
9. Georges J, Jansen S, Jackson J, et al. Alzheimer's disease in real life-The dementia carer's survey. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008; 23: 546-51.
10. Drennan VM, Cole L, Iliffe SA,. Taboo within a stigma? A qualitative study of managing incontinence with people with dementia living at home. BMC Geriatr 2011; 11: 75.
11. Luppa M, Luck T, Braehler E, et al. Prediction of institutionalisation in dementia-A systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008; 26: 65-78.
12. American Psychiatric association work group on Alzheimer's disease and other dementias., Rabins PV, Blacker D, Rovner BW, et al. American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Second edition. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164: 5-56.
13. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment-beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International working group on mild cognitive impairment. J Intern Med. 2004; 256: 240-46.
14. Rait G, Walters K, Bottomley C, et al. Survival of people with clinical diagnosis of dementia in primary care: Cohort study. BMJ 2010; 341: c3584.
15. World Health Organisation. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th Revision Version for 2007) Chapter V F00-F09. 2007; www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/
16. Stokes G,. Incontinent or not? Don't label: Describe and assess. J. Dem Care 1995; 3: 20-21.
17. Milsom AD, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, et al. Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and fecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In:, Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris July 5-8, 2008. Paris: Paris Health Publications Ltd., 2009; pp 35-111.
18. Pretlove SJ, Radley S, Toozs-Hobson PM, et al. Prevalence of anal incontinence according to age and gender a systematic review and meta-regression analysis Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006; 17: 407-17.
19. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R,. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. BMJ 2005; 331: 1064-65.
20. Shamliyan T, Kane RL, Dickinson SJA,. Systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases. Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 1061-70.
21. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC,. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Chapter 8. In:, Higgins JT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. 2011. [www.cochrane- handbook.org/]
22. Loney PL, Chambers LW, Bennett KJ, et al. Critical appraisal of the health research literature prevalence or incidence of a health problem Chronic Dis Can 1998; 19170e6.
23. Chiarelli P, Bower W, Wilson A, et al. Estimating the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence in Australia: Systematic review Australas J Ageing 2005; 24: 19-27.
24. Chung JC,. Care needs assessment of older Chinese individuals with dementia of Hong Kong. Aging Ment Health 2006; 10: 631-37.
25. Landi F, Cesari M, Russo A, Silvernet-HC study group. Potentially reversible risk factors and urinary incontinence in frail older people living in the community. Age Ageing 2004; 32: 194-99.
26. Meaney AM, Croke M, Kirby M,. Needs assessment in dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 20: 322-29.
27. Mohide EA, Pringle DM, Robertson D, et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in patients receiving home care services. CMAJ 1988; 139: 953-56.
28. Nakanishi N, Tatara K, Naramura H, et al. Urinary and fecal incontinence in a community-residing older population in Japan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 215-19.
29. Ouslander JG, Zarit SH, Orr NK, et al. Incontinence among elderly community-dwelling dementia patients. Characteristics, management, and impact on caregivers. J Amer Geriatr Soci 1990; 38: 440-45.
30. Rait G, Fletcher A, Smeeth L, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment: Results from the MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community. Age Ageing 2005; 34: 242-48.
31. Terri L, Borson S, Kiyak HA, et al. Behavioral disturbance, cognitive dysfunction, and functional skill. Prevalence and relationship in Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989; 37: 109-16.
32. Martin J, Metzer H, Ellliot D,. et al. The prevalence of disability among adults. OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain, Report 1. London: Her Majesty's stationary office; 1988.
33. Landi F, Tua E, Onder G, et al. Silvernet-HC study group of Bergamo. The minimum data set for home care: A valid instrument to assess frail older people living in community. Med Care 2000; 38: 1184-90.
34. World Health Organisation. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva; 2007; www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
35. McWalter G, Toner H, McWalter A, et al. A community needs assessment: The care needs assessment pack for dementia (CarenapD)-Its development, reliability and validity. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1998; 13: 16-22.
36. Folstein M, McHugh P,. " Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatry Res 1975; 12: 189-98.
37. Fletcher AE, Jones DA, Bulpitt CJ, et al. The MRC Trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: Objectives, design, and interventions [ISRCTN23494848]. BMC Health Serv Res 2002; 2: 21.
38. Prince M,. Methodological issues in population-based research into dementia in developing countries. A position paper from the 10/66 Dementia Research Group. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 15: 21-30.
39. Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Moniz-Cook ED, Woods RT, et al. Factors affecting timely recognition and diagnosis of dementia across Europe: From awareness to stigma. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 20: 377-86.
40. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535.