A comparison of temporal patterns in the ocean spatial distribution of California's Central Valley Chinook salmon runs

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 574-584

  Satterthwaite, William H ^a,b   Mohr, Michael S ^a   O'Farrell, Michael R ^a   Wells, Brian K ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL VARIATION; BODY SIZE; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ACQUISITION; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; FISHING EFFORT; INDIVIDUAL VARIATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; SALMONID; SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TEMPORAL VARIATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CALIFORNIA; CENTRAL VALLEY [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

FALCONIDAE; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 84876345114     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: 12057533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2012-0395     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Booth, D.J., Bond, N., and Macreadie, P. 2011. Detecting range shifts among Australian fishes in response to climate change. Mar. Freshw. Res. 62(9): 1027-1042. doi:10.1071/MF10270.
2. Buttars, B. 2010. Constant fractional marking/tagging program for Central Valley fall-run Chinook salmon, 2010 marking season. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Red Bluff, California.
3. Carlson, S.M., and Satterthwaite, W.H. 2011. Weakened portfolio effect in a collapsed salmon population complex. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68(9): 1579-1589. doi:10.1139/f2011-084.
4. Cormack, R.M., and Skalski, J.R. 1992. Analysis of coded wire tag returns from commercial catches. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49(9): 1816-1825. doi:10.1139/f92-201.
5. Fisher, A.C., Hanemann, W.M., and Keeler, A.G. 1991. Integrating fishery and water resource management: a biological model of a California salmon fishery. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 20(3): 234-261. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(91)90011-7.
6. Fisher, F.W. 1994. Past and present status of Central Valley Chinook salmon. Conserv. Biol. 8(3): 870-873. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030863-5.x.
7. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., and Rubin, D.B. 2004. Bayesian data analysis. 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London.
8. Geweke, J. 1992. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments. In Bayesian statistics 4. Edited by J.M. Bernardo, J.O. Berger, A.P. Dawid, and A.F.M. Smith. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Goldwasser, L., Mohr, M.S., Grover, A.M., and Palmer-Zwahlen, M.L. 2001. The supporting databases and biological analyses for the revision of the Klamath Ocean Harvest Model. Available from M.S. Mohr, National Marine Fisheries Service, Santa Cruz, California.
10. Harley, S.J., Myers, R.A., and Dunn, A. 2001. Is catch-per-unit-effort proportional to abundance? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58(9): 1760-1772. doi:10.1139/f01-112.
11. Healey, M.C. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. In Pacific salmon life histories. Edited by C. Groot and L. Margolis. UBC Press, Vancouver. pp. 311-391.
12. Hilborn, R., and Walters, C.J. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, New York.
13. Hinke, J.T., Watters, G.M., Boehlert, G.W., and Zedonis, P. 2005. Ocean habitat use in autumn by Chinook salmon in coastal waters of Oregon and California. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 285: 181-192. doi:10.3354/meps285181.
14. Johnson, J.K. 1990. Regional overview of coded wire tagging of anadromous salmon and steelhead in northwest America. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 782-816.
15. Lapi, L., Hamer, M., and Johnson, B. 1990. Data organization and coding for a coastwide mark-recovery data system. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 7: 720-724.
16. Lindley, S., Grimes, C.B., Mohr, M.S., Peterson, W., Stein, J., Anderson, J., Botsford, L., Bottom, D., Busack, C., Collier, T., Ferguson, J., Garza, J., Grover, A., Hankin, D.G., Kope, R., Lawson, P., Low, A., MacFarlane, R., Moore, K., Palmer-Zwahlen, M., Schwing, F., Smith, J., Tracy, C., Webb, R., Wells, B., and Williams, T. 2009. What caused the Sacramento River fall Chinook stock collapse? NOAA Tech. Memo. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-447.
17. MacFarlane, R.B. 2010. Energy dynamics and growth of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the Central Valley of California during the estuarine phase and first ocean year. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 67(10): 1549-1565. doi:10.1139/F10-080.
18. Mangel, M. 2006. The theoretical biologist's toolbox: quantitative methods for ecology and evolutionary biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Mohr, M.S. 2006. Klamath River fall Chinook assessment: overview. Available from M.S. Mohr, National Marine Fisheries Service, Santa Cruz, California.
20. Morita, K., and Fukuwaka, M.-A. 2006. Does size matter most? The effect of growth history on probabilistic reaction norm for salmon maturation. Evolution, 60(7): 1516-1521. doi:10.1554/06-007.1.
21. Moyle, P.B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
22. Myers, J.M., Kope, R.G., Bryant, G.J., Teel, D., Lierheimer, L.J., Wainwright, T.C., Grant, W.S., Waknitz, F.W., Neely, K., Lindley, S.T., and Waples, R.S. 1998. Status Review of Chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. NOAA Tech. Memo. NOAA-TM-NMFS-NWFSC-35.
23. Nandor, G.F., Longwill, J.R., and Webb, D.L. 2010. Overview of the coded wire tag program in the greater Pacific region of North America. In PNAMP Special Publication: Tagging, telemetry and marking measures for monitoring fish populations-a compendium of new and recent science for use in informing technique and decision modalities. Edited by K.S. Wolf and J.S. O'Neal. Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Special Publication, Duvall, Washington. pp. 5-46.
24. Neillands, G.W. 1995. Documents submitted to the ESA Administrative Record for west coast Chinook salmon: responses to questionnaires for the Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne Rivers. Available from Environmental and Technical Services Division, National Marine Fisheries Service, Portland, Oregon.
25. Norris, J.G., Hyun, S.-Y., and Anderson, J.J. 2000. Ocean distribution of Columbia River upriver bright fall Chinook salmon stocks. North Pac. Anad. Fish Commiss. Bull. No. 2. pp. 221-232.
26. O'Farrell, M.R., Palmer-Zwahlen, M.L., and Simon, J. 2010. Is the September 1 river return date approximation appropriate for Klamath River fall Chinook? NOAA Tech. Memo. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-468.
27. O'Farrell, M.R., Mohr, M.S., Grover, A.M., and Satterthwaite, W.H. 2012. Sacramento River winter Chinook cohort reconstruction: analysis of ocean fishery impacts. NOAA Tech. Memo. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-491.
28. Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2009. Preseason report I: Stock abundance analysis for 2009 ocean salmon fisheries. Pacific Fishery Management Council, Portland, Oregon.
29. Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2012a. Pacific Coast Salmon Fishery Management Plan for Commercial and Recreational Salmon Fisheries off the Coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California as Revised Through Amendment 16. Pacific Fishery Management Council, Portland, Oregon.
30. Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2012b. Review of 2011 ocean salmon fisheries. Pacific Fishery Management Council, Portland, Oregon.
31. Plummer, M., Best, N., Cowles, K., and Vines, K. 2006. CODA: Convergence Diagnosis and Output Analysis for MCMC [online]. R News, 6(1): 7-11. Available from http://CRAN.R-project.org/ doc/Rnews/.
32. Pyper, B.J., and Peterman, R.M. 1998. Comparison of methods to account for autocorrelation in correlation analyses of fish data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55(9): 2127-2140. doi:10.1139/f98-104.
33. Quinn, T.P., Chamberlin, J., and Brannon, E.L. 2011. Experimental evidence of population-specific marine spatial distributions of Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Environ. Biol. Fish. 92(3): 313-322. doi:10.1007/s10641-011-9841-z.
34. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [online]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
35. Raftery, A.E., and Lewis, S.M. 1995. The number of iterations, convergence diagnostics and generic metropolis algorithms. In Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Edited by W.R. Gilks, D.J. Spiegelhalter, and S. Richardson. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. pp. 115-130.
36. Satterthwaite, W.H., Mohr, M.S., O'Farrell, M.R., and Wells, B.K. 2012. A Bayesian hierarchical model of size-at-age in ocean-harvested stocks-quantifying effects of climate and temporal variability. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69(5): 942-954. doi:10.1139/f2012-036.
37. Shelton, A.O., Dick, E.J., Pearson, D.E., Ralston, S., and Mangel, M. 2012. Estimating species composition and quantifying uncertainty in multispecies fisheries: hierarchical Bayesian models for stratified sampling protocols with missing data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69(2): 231-246. doi:10.1139/f2011-152.
38. Trudel, M., Fisher, J., Orsi, J.A., Morris, J.F.T., Thiess, M.E., Sweeting, R.M., Hinton, S., Fergusson, E.A., and Welch, D.W. 2009. Distribution and migration of juvenile Chinook salmon derived from Coded Wire Tag recoveries along the continental shelf of western North America. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 138(6): 1369-1391. doi:10.1577/T08-181.1.
39. Tucker, S., Trudel, M., Welch, D.W., Candy, J.R., Morris, J.F.T., Thiess, M.E., Wallace, C., Teel, D.J., Crawford, W., Farley, E.V., Jr., and Beacham, T.D. 2009. Seasonal stock-specific migrations of juvenile sockeye salmon along the West Coast of North America: implications for growth. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 138(6): 1458-1480. doi:10.1577/T08-211.1.
40. Tucker, S., Trudel, M., Welch, D.W., Candy, J.R., Morris, J.F.T., Thiess, M.E., Wallace, C., and Beacham, T.D. 2011. Life history and seasonal stock-specific ocean migration of juvenile Chinook salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 140(4): 1101-1119. doi:10.1080/00028487.2011.607035.
41. Vogel, D.A., and Marine, K.R. 1991. Guide to upper Sacramento River Chinook salmon life history. Prepared for the US Bureau of Reclamation, Central Valley Project. CH2M Hill.
42. Weitkamp, L.A. 2010. Marine distributions of Chinook salmon from the West Coast of North America determined by Coded Wire Tag recoveries. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 139(1): 147-170. doi:10.1577/T08-225.1.
43. Weitkamp, L., and Neely, K. 2002. Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) ocean migration patterns: insight from marine coded-wire tag recoveries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59(7): 1100-1115. doi:10.1139/f02-075.
44. Wells, B.K., Grimes, C.B., Field, J.C., and Reiss, C.S. 2006. Covariation between the average lengths of mature coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) and the ocean environment. Fish. Oceanogr. 15(1): 67-79. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00361.x.
45. Wells, B.K., Grimes, C.B., and Waldvogel, J.B. 2007. Quantifying the effects of wind, upwelling, curl, sea surface temperature and sea level height on growth and maturation of a California Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) population. Fish. Oceanogr. 16(4): 363-382. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2007. 00437.x.
46. Wells, B.K., Grimes, C.B., Sneva, J.G., McPherson, S., and Waldvogel, J.B. 2008. Relationships between oceanic conditions and growth of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from California, Washington, and Alaska, USA. Fish. Oceanogr. 17(2): 101-125. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2008.00467.x.
47. Williams, J.G. 2006. Central Valley salmon: a perspective on Chinook and steelhead in the Central Valley of California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 4(3): Art. 2.
48. Worley, S.J., Woodruff, S.D., Reynolds, R.W., Lubker, S.J., and Lott, N. 2005. ICOADS Release 2.1 data and products. Int. J. Climatol. 25: 823-842. doi:10. 1002/joc.1166.
49. Yoshiyama, R., Fisher, F., and Moyle, P. 1998. Historical abundance and decline of Chinook salmon in the Central Valley region of California. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 18(3): 487-521. doi:10.1577/1548-8675(1998)018<0487: HAADOC>2.0.CO;2.