Comparison of the vulnerability risk for positive versus negative atheroma plaque morphology

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1248-1254

  Cilla, M ^a,b   Pena E ^a,b   Martinez M A ^a,b   Kelly, D J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b BIOMATERIALES Y NANOMEDICINA CIBER BBN   (Spain)

^c TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Coronary disease; Hyperelastic material; Parametric analysis; Positive and negative remodeling; Vulnerable plaque

Indexed keywords

CORONARY DISEASE; HYPERELASTIC MATERIALS; PARAMETRIC -ANALYSIS; POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE REMODELING; VULNERABLE PLAQUES;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MORPHOLOGY; STRESS CONCENTRATION;

BLOOD VESSELS;

ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTERY RUPTURE; ARTICLE; ATHEROMA PLAQUE DISTRIBUTION; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FIBROUS CAP THICKNESS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STENOSIS RATIO; WALL STRESS;

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PLAQUE, ATHEROSCLEROTIC; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84876338928     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alastrué V., Peña E., Martínez M.A., Doblaré M. Assessing the use of the "opening angle method" to enforce residual stresses in patient-specific arteries. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2007, 35:1821-1837.
2. Armentano R., Megnien J.L., Simon A., Bellenfant F., Barra J., Levenson J. Effects of hypertension on viscoelasticity of carotid and femoral arteries in humans. Hypertension 1995, 26:48-54.
3. Armentano R., Santana D., Cabrera E., Graf S., Perez H., German Y.Z., Saldias M.D.C., Alvarez I. An in vitro study of cryopreserved and fresh human arteries. a comparison with EPTFE prostheses and human arteries studied non-invasively in vivo. Cryobiology 2006, 52:17-26.
4. Bluestein D., Alemu Y., Avrahami I., Gharib M., Dumont K., Ricotta J.J., Einav S. Influence of microcalcifications on vulnerable plaque mechanics using FSI modelling. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:1111-1118.
5. Carew T.E., Vaishnav R.N., Patel D.J. Compressibility of the arterial wall. Circulation Research 1968, 23:61-86.
6. Cheng G., Loree H., Kamm R., Fishbein M., Lee R. Distribution of circumferential stress in ruptured and stable atherosclerotic lesions. A structural analysis with histopathological correlation. Circulation 1993, 87:1179-1187.
7. Chuong C., Fung Y. Compressibility and constitutive equation of arterial wall in radial compression experiments. Journal of Biomechanics 1984, 17(1):35-40.
8. Cilla M., Martinez J., Peña E., Martinez M. Machine learning techniques as a helpful tool towards determination of plaque vulnerability. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2012, 59(4):1155-1161.
9. Cilla, M., Peña, E., Martinez, M., 2012b. 3D computational parametric analysis of eccentric atheroma plaque. Influence of axial and circumferential residual stresses. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 7, 1001-1013.
10. Cox R. Passive mechanics and connective tissue composition of canine arteries. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 1978, 234(5):533-541.
11. Falk E., Shah P.K., Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995, 92(3):657-671.
12. Finet G., Ohayon J., Rioufol G. Biomechanical interaction between cap thickness, lipid core composition and blood pressure in vulnerable coronary plaque. impact on stability or instability. Coronary Artery Disease 2004, 15:13-20.
13. Fung Y.C. Biomechanics. Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues 1993, Springer Verlag, New York.
14. Fung Y.C., Fronek K., Patitucci P. Pseudoelasticity of arteries and the choice of its mathematical expression. American Journal of Physiology-Heart 1979, 237:620-631.
15. Gasser T.C., Ogden R.W., Holzapfel G.A. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006, 3:15-35.
16. Glagov S., Weisenberg E., Zarins C.K., Stankunavicius R., Kolettis G.J. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. New England Journal of Medicine 1987, 316:1371-1375.
17. Holzapfel G.A., Gasser C.T., Sommer G., Regitnig P. Determination of the layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with non-atherosclerotic intimal thickening, and related constitutive modelling. American Journal of Physiology-Heart 2005, 289:H2048-H2058.
18. Humphrey J. Vascular mechanics, mechanobiology, and remodeling. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology 2009, 9(2):243-257.
19. Kock S.A., Nygaard J.V., Eldrup N., Fründ E.-T., Klærke A., Paaske W.P., Falk E., Kim W.Y. Mechanical stresses in carotid plaques using MRI-based fluid-structure interaction models. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41:1651-1658.
20. Krishna Kumar R., Balakrishnan K.R. Influence of lumen shape and vessel geometry on plaque stresses. possible role in the increased vulnerability of a remodelled vessel and the shoulder of a plaque. Heart 2005, 91:1459-1465.
21. Lee R. Atherosclerotic lesion mechanics versus biology. Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie 2000, 89:80-84.
22. Lee R., Grodzinsky A., Frank E., Kamm R., Schoen F. Structure-dependent dynamic mechanical behavior of fibrous caps from human atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation 1991, 83:1764-1770.
23. Maher E., Creane A., Sultan S., Hynes N., Lally C., Kelly D. Tensile and compressive properties of fresh human carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42(16):2760-2767.
24. Maher E., Creane A., Sultan S., Hynes N., Lally C., Kelly D. Inelasticity of human carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2011, 39:2445-2455.
25. Marquardt D.W. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 1963, 11:431-441.
26. Naghavi M., Libby P., Falk E., Casscells S.W., Litovsky S., Rumberger J., Badimon J.J., Stefanadis C., Moreno P., Pasterkamp G., Fayad Z., Stone P.H., Waxman S., Raggi P., Madjid M., Zarrabi A., Burke A., Yuan C., Fitzgerald P.J., Siscovick D.S., de Korte C.L., Aikawa M., Juhani Airaksinen K., Assmann G., Becker C.R., Chesebro J.H., Farb A., Galis Z.S., Jackson C., Jang I.-K., Koenig W., Lodder R.A., March K., Demirovic J., Navab M., Priori S.G., Rekhter M.D., Bahr R., Grundy S.M., Mehran R., Colombo A., Boerwinkle E., Ballantyne C., Insull, William J., Schwartz R.S., Vogel R., Serruys P.W., Hansson G.K., Faxon D.P., Kaul S., Drexler H., Greenland P., Muller J.E., Virmani R., Ridker P.M., Zipes D.P., Shah P.K., Willerson J.T. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient. a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 2003, 108:1664-1672.
27. Ohayon J., Finet G., Treyve F., Rioufol O. A three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in a coronary atherosclerotic plaque. in-vivo prediction of plaque rupture location. Biomechanics Applied to Computer Assisted Surgery 2005, 17:225-241.
28. Ohayon J., Finet G., Gharib A.M., Herzka D.A., Tracqui P., Heroux J., Rioufol G., Kotys M.S., Elagha A., Pettigrew R.I. Necrotic core thickness and positive arterial remodeling index. emergent biomechanical factors for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture. American Journal of Physiology-Heart 2008, 295:717-727.
29. Ohayon J., Gharib A.M., Garcia A., Heroux J., Yazdani S.K., Malve M., Tracqui P., Martinez M.-A., Doblare M., Finet G., Pettigrew R.I. Is arterial wall-strain stiffening an additional process responsible for atherosclerosis in coronary bifurcations?. an in vivo study based on dynamic CT and MRI. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2011, 301:1097-1106.
30. Pasterkamp G., Falk E. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture. an overview. Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology 2000, 3:81-86.
31. Patel D., Fry D. The elastic symmetry of arterial segments in dogs. Circulation Research 1969, 24(1):1-8.
32. Peña E., Alastrué V., Laborda A., Martínez M., Doblaré M. A constitutive formulation of vascular tissue mechanics including viscoelasticity and softening behaviour. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:984-989.
33. Rodriguez E., Hoger A., McCulloch A. Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues. Journal of Biomechanics 1994, 27:455-467.
34. Roy C.S. The elastic properties of the arterial wall. The Journal of Physiology 1881, 3(2):125-159.
35. Schroeder A.P., Falk E. Vulnerable and dangerous coronary plaques. Atherosclerosis 1995, 118(Supplement (0)):S141-S149.
36. Sipahi I., Tuzcu E.M., Schoenhagen P., Nicholls S.J., Ozduran V., Kapadia S., Nissen S.E. Compensatory enlargement of human coronary arteries during progression of atherosclerosis is unrelated to atheroma burden. serial intravascular ultrasound observations from the reversal trial. European Heart Journal 2006, 27:1664-1670.
37. Spencer, A.J.M., 1971. Theory of invariants. In: Continuum Physics. Academic Press, New York, pp. 239-253.
38. Van der Wal A.C., Becker A.E. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture-pathologic basis of plaque stability and instability. Cardiovascular Research 1999, 41:334-344.
39. Varnava A.M., Davies M.J. Relation between coronary artery remodelling (compensatory dilatation) and stenosis in human native coronary arteries. Heart 2001, 86:207-211.
40. Varnava A.M., Mills P.G., Davies M.J. Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation 2002, 105:939-943.
41. Versluis A., Bank A.J., Douglas W.H. Fatigue and plaque rupture in myocardial infarction. Journal of Biomechanics 2006, 39:339-347.
42. Virmani R., Kolodgie F.D., Burke A.P., Farb A., Schwartz S.M. Lessons from sudden coronary death. a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 2000, 20:1262-1275.
43. Williamson S.D., Lam Y., Younis H.F., Huang H., Patel S., Kaazempur-Mofrad M.R., Kamm R.D. On the sensitivity of wall stresses in diseased arteries to variable material properties. ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2003, 125:147-155.