Tr(e)ading cautiously: Precaution in wto decision making

Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 160-181

  McDonald, Jan ^a  

^a Higher Education Division   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876331009     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Atik, J. (1997), 'Science and international regulatory governance', Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17, 736-58.
2. Bermudez, E. (2004), Sustainability Assessments of Trade Policies and Programmes, Technical Report, January 2001-December 2003, Gland: WWF International.
3. Birnie, P. and A. Boyle (2002), International Law and the Environment, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Cameron, J. (1999), 'The precautionary principle', in G. Sampson and W. Chambers (eds), Trade, Environment and the Millennium, Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 240-69.
5. Central Laboratory for Agricultural Expert Systems (CLAES), Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (FARN) and World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (2003), Comments on the Proposed Methodology: EC Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Trade Aspects of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement - Draft Inception Report, Gland: WWF International.
6. Codex Alimentarius Commission (2001), Procedural Manual of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, 13th edn., Rome: FAO.
7. European Commission (2000), Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, COM(2000)1 final, available at http://europa.eu.int/ comm/dgs/healthconsumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf. (accessed 21 October 2005).
8. Harremoës, P.,D. Gee,M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J.Keys, B.Wynne and S. Guedes Vaz (eds) (2002), The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings, London: Earthscan.
9. Hauselmann, P. (1996), ISO Inside Out: A WWF International Discussion Paper, Gland: WWF International.
10. Howse,R. (2000), 'Democracy, science, and free trade: risk regulation on trial at the WTO', Michigan Law Review, 98, 2329-57.
11. Kirkpatrick, C. and O. Morrissey (1999), WTO New Round Sustainability Impact Assessment Study Phase One Report, Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management and Environmental Impact Assessment Centre, University of Manchester and Centre for Research on Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham.
12. Nunn, M. (2001), 'Allowing for risk in setting standards', in D. Robertson and A. Kellow (eds), Globalization and the Environment, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 95-105.
13. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1994), The Environmental Effects of Trade, Paris: OECD.
14. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000), Assessing the Environmental Effects of Trade Liberalisation Agreements: Methodologies, Paris: OECD.
15. Sunstein, C. and R. Pildes (1997), 'Experts, economists and democrats', in C. Sunstein (ed.), Free Markets and Social Justice, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 133-48.
16. Sykes, A. (2002), 'Domestic regulation, sovereignty, and scientific evidence requirements: a pessimistic view', Chicago Journal of International Law, 3 (2), 353-68.
17. United States Trade Representative and Council on Environmental Quality (2000), Guidelines for the Implementation of Executive Order 13141 - Environmental Review of Trade Agreements, Washington, DC: USTR/CEQ.
18. Wirth,D. (1994), 'The role of science in the Uruguay Round and NAFTA trade disciplines', Cornell International Law Journal, 27, 817-59.