Development of an efficient pretreatment process for enzymatic saccharification of Eastern redcedar

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 136, Issue , 2013, Pages 131-139

  Ramachandriya, Karthikeyan D ^a   Wilkins, Mark R ^a   Hiziroglu, Salim ^a   Dunford, Nurhan T ^a   Atiyeh, Hasan K ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Enzymatic saccharification; Sodium bisulfite pretreatment; Softwood

Indexed keywords

DELIGNIFICATION; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; GLUCOSE; SOFTWOODS; SULFURIC ACID; WOOD;

BIO-ENERGY; ENZYMATIC SACCHARIFICATION; PRE-TREATMENT; PRETREATMENT CONDITIONS; PRETREATMENT PROCESS; PRETREATMENT TEMPERATURE; SODIUM BISULFITE; TREATMENT DESIGN;

LOADING;

BISULFITE; GLUCAN; GLUCOSE; HEMICELLULOSE; LIGNIN; SULFURIC ACID;

BIOENERGY; BIOMASS POWER; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE; CONIFEROUS TREE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; POLYSACCHARIDE;

ARTICLE; CUPRESSACEAE; DELIGNIFICATION; HYDROLYSIS; JUNIPERUS VIRIGINIANA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHARIFICATION; TEMPERATURE; TIME; WOOD;

DELIGNIFICATION; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; LOADING; SACCHARIFICATION; SOFTWOODS; SULFURIC ACID; WOOD;

JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA;

EID: 84876326299     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.056     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adney B., Baker J. Measurement of Cellulase Activities 2008, National Renewable Energy Laboratories, Golden, Colarado.
2. Berlin A., Gilkes N., Kurabi A., Bura R., Tu M.B., Kilburn D., Saddler J. Weak lignin-rinding enzymes - a novel approach to improve activity of cellulases for hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 121:163-170.
3. Börjesson J., Engqvist M., Sipos B., Tjerneld F. Effect of poly(ethylene glycol) on enzymatic hydrolysis and adsorption of cellulase enzymes to pretreated lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 41:186-195.
4. Bryce J.R.G. Sulfite Pulping. Pulp and Paper: Chemistry and Chemical Technology 1980, 291-376. John Wiley and Sons, New York. J.P. Casey (Ed.).
5. Casey J.P. Pulp and Paper: Chemistry and Chemical Technology 1980, John Wiley and Sons, New York. Third ed.
6. Ewanick S.M., Bura R., Saddler J.N. Acid-catalyzed steam pretreatment of lodgepole pine and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation to ethanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 98:737-746.
7. Fatehi P., Ni Y. Integrated Forest Biorefinery-Sulfite Process Sustainable Production of Fuels, Chemicals, and Fibers from Forest Biomass 2011, American Chemical Society, pp. 409-441.
8. Glasser W.G. Lignin. Pulp and Paper: Chemistry and Chemical Technology 1980, 39-112. John Wiley and Sons, New York. J.P. Casey (Ed.).
9. Hiziroglu S., Holcomb R.B., Wu Q. Manufacturing particleboard from Eastern redcedar. Forest Prod. J. 2002, 52:72-75.
10. Ingruber O.V. The sulfite cook. Paper and Pulp Manufacture: Sulfite Science and Technology 1985, 24-49. The Joint Textbook Committee of The Paper Industry. O.V. Ingruber, M.J. Kocurek, A. Wong (Eds.).
11. Krassig H.A. Cellulose: Structure, Accessibility and Reactivity 1993, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
12. Kumar L., Chandra R., Chung P., Saddler J. Can the same steam pretreatment conditions be used for most softwoods to achieve good, enzymatic hydrolysis and sugar yields. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7827-7833.
13. Mansfield S.D., Mooney C., Saddler J.N. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Prog. 1999, 15:804-816.
14. McKinley C.R. Potential Biomass Energy Available from Oklahoma redcedar 2012, Oklahoma State University.
15. Monavari S., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Impact of impregnation time and chip size on sugar yield in pretreatment of softwood for ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:6312-6316.
16. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Development Using Designed Experiments 1995, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
17. National Resources Conservation Service, 2012. Controlling Eastern red cedar < >(accessed: 04:11:12). http://www.ok.nrcs.usda.gov/news/OKReleases/Generic/ControllingEasternRedCedar.html.
18. Nguyen Q., Tucker M., Boynton B., Keller F., Schell D. Dilute acid pretreatment of softwoods. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1998, 70:77-87.
19. Pan X., Xie D., Gilkes N., Gregg D.J., Saddler J.N. Strategies to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated softwood with high residual lignin content. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 124:1069-1079.
20. Pasangulapati V., Ramachandriya K.D., Kumar A., Wilkins M.R., Jones C.L., Huhnke R.L. Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin on thermochemical conversion characteristics of the selected biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114:663-669.
21. Pessani N.K., Atiyeh H.K., Wilkins M.R., Bellmer D.D., Banat I.M. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Kanlow switchgrass by thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3: the effect of enzyme loading, temperature and higher solid loadings. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:10618-10624.
22. Price K., Brooks J., Dobbeleare D., Gaines-Bey T., Loftus K., Starzec K. The Susceptibility of Native Grasslands to Woody Plant Encroachment: a study of Juniperus Virginiana 2010, Kansas State University.
23. Ramos L.P. The chemistry involved in the steam treatment of lignocellulosic materials. Química Nova 2003, 26:863-871.
24. Ramos L., Breuil C., Saddler J. Comparison of steam pretreatment of eucalyptus, aspen, and spruce wood chips and their enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1992, 34-35:37-48.
25. Shuai L., Yang Q., Zhu J., Lu F., Weimer P., Ralph J., Pan X. Comparative study of SPORL and dilute-acid pretreatments of spruce for cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:3106-3114.
26. Sluiter A., Hames B., Hyman D., Payne C., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D., Wolfe J. Determination of Total Solids in Biomass and Total Dissolved Solids in Liquid Process Samples 2008, National Renewable Energy Laboratories, Golden, Colarado.
27. Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluite J., Templeton D. Determination of Sugars by Products and Degradation Products in Liquid Fraction Process Samples 2008, National Renewable Energy Laboratories, Golden, Colarado.
28. Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D., Crocker D. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass 2008, National Renewable Energy Laboratories, Golden, Colarado.
29. Starks P.J., Venuto B.C., Eckroat J.A., Lucas T. Measuring Eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) mass with the use of satellite imagery. Rangeland Ecol. Manage. 2011, 64:176-186.
30. Stone J., Scallan A. The effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood Part III. A comparison between the sulphite and kraft processes. Pulp Pap. 1968, 69-74.
31. Sun Y., Cheng J.Y. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83:1-11.
32. Tian S., Luo X., Yang X., Zhu J. Robust cellulosic ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine using an adapted strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae without detoxification. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8678-8685.
33. Yu M., Wang G., Liu C., Ruhan A. Precipitation of lignosulfonates from SPORL liquid by calcium hydroxide treatment. Bioresources 2012, 7:868-877.
34. Zhu J., Pan X. Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4992-5002.
35. Zhu J., Pan X., Wang G., Gleisner R. Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2411-2418.