Is the N170 face specific? Controversy, context, and theory

Neuropsychological Trends

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 7-26

  Earp, Brian D ^a   Everett, Jim A C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Expertise; Face perception; Face specific; Modularity; N170; Thierry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876323698     PISSN: 1970321X     EISSN: 19703201     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7358/neur-2013-013-earp     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bentin, S., Taylor, M., Rousselet, G., Itier, R., Caldara, R., Schyns, P., Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2007). Controlling interstimulus perceptual variance does not abolish N170 face sensitivity. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 802-803.
2. Bentin, S., Truett, A., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565.
3. Bötzel, K., & Grüsser, O.J. (1989). Electric brain potentials evoked by pictures of faces and non-faces: a search for "face-specific" EEG-potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 77, 349-360.
4. Bötzel, K., Schulze, S., & Stodieck, R.G. (1995). Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 135-143.
5. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
6. Carmel, D., & Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1-29.
7. Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., Rizzo, M., Vamey, N., & Gersh, F. (1982). Aphasia with non hemorrhagic lesions in the basal ganglia and internal capsule. Archives of Neurology, 39, 15-20.
8. Dering, B., Hoshino, N., & Theirry, G. (2012). N170 modulation is expertisedriven: evidence from word-inversion effects in speakers of different languages. In: Ojima, S., Otsu, Y., Connolly, J., & Thierry, G. (eds.), Future trends in the biology of language. Tokyo: Keiogijukudaigakushuppankai.
9. Dering, B., Martin, C.D., & Thierry, G. (2009). Is the N170 peak of visual eventrelated brain potentials car-selective? Neuroreport, 20, 902-906.
10. Eimer, M. (1998). Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialised eye processor? Neuroreport, 9, 2945-2948.
11. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Ganis, G., Smith, D., & Schendan, H.E. (2012). The N170, not the P1, indexes the earliest time for categorical perception of faces, regardless of interstimulus variance. Neuroimage, 62, 1563-1574.
13. Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K.M., & Collins, D. (2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428-432.
14. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M.J. (1997). Becoming a "greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1681.
15. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind. London: Allen Lane.
16. Hume, D. (1748/1955). An inquiry concerning human understanding. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
17. Itier, R.J., & Taylor, M.J. (2004). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 132-142.
18. Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). The speed of individual face categorization. Psychological Science, 17, 485-492.
19. Jeeves, M.A. (1984). The historical roots and recurring issues on neurobiological studies of face perception. Human Neurobiology, 3, 191-196.
20. Joyce, C., & Rossion, B. (2005). The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: the effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2613-2631.
21. Kanwisher, N.G. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759-763.
22. Kanwisher, N.G., & Yovel, G. (2006). The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 361, 2109-2128.
23. Latinus, M., & Taylor, M.J. (2005). Holistic processing of faces: learning effects with Mooney faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1316-1327.
24. McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J.C., & Allison, T. (1997). Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 605-610.
25. Mooney, C.M. (1957). Age in the development of closure ability in children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 11, 219-226.
26. Pernet, C., Schyns, P.G., & Demonet, J.F. (2007). Specific, selective or preferential: comments on category specificity in neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 35 (3), 991-997.
27. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
28. Popper, K.R. (1956). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
29. Quian Quiroga, R., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2005). Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature, 435, 1102-1107.
30. Rolls, E.T., & Baylis, G.C. (1986). Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 65, 38-48.
31. Rossion, B., Collins, D., Goffaux, V., & Curran, T. (2007). Long-term expertise with artificial objects increases visual competition with early face categorization processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 543-555.
32. Rossion, B., Curran, T., & Gauthier, I. (2002). A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition, 85, 197-202.
33. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M.J., Despland, P., Bruyer, R., Linotte, S., & Crommelinck, M. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport, 11, 69-74.
34. Rossion, B., & Jacques, C. (2008). Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive response in human brain? The lesson on the N170. Neuroimage, 39, 1959-1979.
35. Rousselet, G.A., Pernet, C.R., Caldara, R., & Schyns, P.G. (2011). Visual object categorization in the brain: what can we really learn from ERP peaks? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00156.
36. Schendan, H., & Ganis, G. (2013). Face-specificity is robust across diverse stimuli and individual people, even when interstimulus variance is zero. Psychophysiology, 50 (3), 287-291.
37. Schweinberger, S.R., Huddy, V., & Burton, A.M. (2004). N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. Neuroreport, 15 (9), 1501-1505.
38. Sperber, D. (2005). Modularity and relevance: how can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? In: Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., & Stich, S. (eds.), The innate mind: structure and contents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Thierry, G., Martin, C.D., Downing, P.E., & Pegna, A.J. (2007a). Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 10 (7), 505-511.
40. Thierry, G., Martin, C.D., Downing, P.E., & Pegna, A.J. (2007b). Is the N170 sensitive to the human face or to several intertwined perceptual and conceptual factors? Nature Neuroscience, 10 (7), 802-803.
41. Tsao, D.Y., Freiwald, W.A., Tootell, R.B., & Livingstone, M.S. (2006). A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science, 311, 670-674.
42. Vizioli, L., Foreman, K., Rousselet, G.A., & Caldara, R. (2010). Inverting faces elicits sensitivity to race on the N170 component: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Vision, 10, 1-23.
43. Xu, Y., Liu, J., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise. Neuropsychologia, 43, 588-597.