Salt marsh vegetation as a carbonyl sulfide (COS) source to the atmosphere

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 73, Issue , 2013, Pages 131-137

  Whelan, Mary E ^a   Min, Dong Ha ^b   Rhew, Robert C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Batis maritima; Carbonyl sulfide; Salt marsh biogeochemistry; Sulfur cycle

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATION; BATIS MARITIMA; CARBONYL SULFIDE; GLOBAL CLIMATES; REDUCED SULFUR COMPOUNDS; SALT MARSHES; SOIL TEMPERATURE; SULFUR CYCLES;

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; PLANTS (BOTANY); SOILS; SULFUR; WETLANDS;

SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

CARBONYL SULFIDE; SULFUR DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOME; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); GLOBAL CLIMATE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; POLLUTANT SOURCE; SALTMARSH; SOIL TEMPERATURE; SULFIDE; SULFUR; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERE; FLOODING; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALT MARSH; SOIL; SOIL TEMPERATURE;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; GULF OF MEXICO;

BATIS MARITIMA;

EID: 84876319140     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.048     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Blonquist J.M., Montzka S.A., Munger J.W., Yakir D., Desai A.R., Dragoni D., Griffis T.J., Monson R.K., Scott R.L., Bowling D.R. The potential of carbonyl sulfide as a proxy for gross primary production at flux tower sites. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 2011, 116.
2. Campbell J.E., Carmichael G.R., Chai T., Mena-Carrasco M., Tang Y., Blake D.R., Blake N.J., Vay S.A., Collatz G.J., Baker I., Berry J.A., Montzka S.A., Sweeney C., Schnoor J.L., Stanier C.O. Photosynthetic control of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide during the growing season. Science 2008, 322:1085-1088.
3. Castro M.S., Galloway J.N. A comparison of sulfur-free and ambient air enclosure techniques for measuring the exchange of reduced sulfur gases between soils and the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 1991, 96:15427-15515.
4. 2 exchange. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 1997, 11:15-27.
5. Crutzen P.J. The possible importance of CSO for the sulfate layer of the stratosphere. Geophysical Research Letters 1976, 3:73-76.
6. de Mello W.Z., Hines M.E. Application of static and dynamic enclosures for determining dimethyl sulfide and carbonyl sulfide exchange in Sphagnum peatlands: implications for the magnitude and direction of flux. Journal of Geophysical Research 1994, 99:14-601.
7. DeLaune R.D., Devai I., Lindau C.W. Flux of reduced sulfur gases along a salinity gradient in Louisiana coastal marshes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 2002, 54:1003-1011.
8. Devai I., DeLaune R.D. Formation of volatile sulfur compounds in salt marsh sediment as influenced by soil redox condition. Organic Geochemistry 1995, 23:283-287.
9. Fried A., Klinger L.F., Erickson D.J. Atmospheric carbonyl sulfide exchange in bog microcosms. Geophysical Research Letters 1993, 20:129-132.
10. Geng C., Mu Y. Carbonyl sulfide and dimethyl sulfide exchange between lawn and the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 2004, 109:D12302.
11. Geng C., Mu Y. Carbonyl sulfide and dimethyl sulfide exchange between trees and the atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment 2006, 40:1373-1383.
12. Johnson D.S. The development of the shoot, male flower and seedling of Batis maritima L. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 1935, 62:19-31.
13. Kanda K., Tsuruta H., Minami K. Emissions of biogenic sulfur gases from maize and wheat fields. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1995, 41:1-8.
14. Kesselmeier J., Merk L. Exchange of carbonyl sulfide (COS) between agricultural plants and the atmosphere: studies on the deposition of COS to peas, corn and rapeseed. Biogeochemistry 1993, 23:47-59.
15. Kesselmeier J., Teusch N., Kuhn U. Controlling variables for the uptake of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide by soil. Journal of Geophysical Research 1999, 104:11577-11584.
16. Kettle A.J., Kuhn U., Von Hobe M., Kesselmeier J., Andreae M.O. Global budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: temporal and spatial variations of the dominant sources and sinks. Journal of Geophysical Research 2002, 107:4658-4674.
17. Kuhn U., Ammann C., Wolf A., Meixner F.X., Andreae M.O., Kesselmeier J. Carbonyl sulfide exchange on an ecosystem scale: soil represents a dominant sink for atmospheric COS. Atmospheric Environment 1999, 33:995-1008.
18. Lehmann S., Conrad R. Characteristics of turnover of carbonyl sulfide in four different soils. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 1996, 23:193-207.
19. 2S and COS emission fluxes from Calamagrostis angustifolia wetlands in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Atmospheric Environment 2006, 40:6303-6312.
20. Liu J., Geng C., Mu Y., Zhang Y., Xu Z., Wu H. Exchange of carbonyl sulfide (COS) between the atmosphere and various soils in China. Biogeosciences 2010, 7:753-762.
21. Livingston G.P., Hutchinson G.L. Enclosure-based measurement of trace gas exchange: applications and sources of error. Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water 1995, 14-51. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford. P.A. Matson, R.C. Harriss (Eds.).
22. Luttge U., Popp M., Medina E., Cram W.J., Diaz M., Griffiths H., Lee H.S.J., Schafer C., Smith J.A.C., Stimmel K.H. Ecophysiology of xerophytic and halophytic vegetation of a coastal alluvial plain in northern Venezuela. V. The Batis maritima-Seuvium portulacastrum vegetation unit. New Phytologist 1989, 111:283-291.
23. Manzoni S., Vico G., Katul G., Fay P.A., Polley W., Palmroth S., Porporato A. Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates. Functional Ecology 2011, 25:456-467.
24. 2. Journal of Geophysical Research 2007, 112:D09302.
25. Notholt J., Kuang Z., Rinsland C.P., Toon G.C., Rex M., Jones N., Albrecht T., Deckelmann H., Krieg J., Weinzierl C., Bingemer H., Weller R., Schrems O. Enhanced upper tropical tropospheric COS: impact on the stratospheric aerosol layer. Science 2003, 300:307-310.
26. Piluk J., Hartel P.G., Haines B.L., Giannasi D.E. Association of carbon disulfide with plants, in the family Fabaceae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2001, 27:1525-1534.
27. Pitari G., Mancini E., Rizi V., Shindell D.T. Impact of future climate and emission changes on stratospheric aerosols and ozone. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 2002, 59:414-440.
28. Protoschill-Krebs G., Kesselmeier J. Enzymatic pathways for the consumption of carbonyl sulphide (COS) by higher plants. Botanica Acta 1992, 105:206-212.
29. Protoschill-Krebs G., Wilhelm C., Kesselmeier J. Consumption of carbonyl sulphide (COS) by higher plant carbonic anhydrase (CA). Atmospheric Environment 1996, 30:3151-3156.
30. Rhew R.C., Abel T. Measuring simultaneous production and consumption fluxes of methyl chloride and methyl bromide in annual temperate grasslands. Environmental Science and Technology 2007, 41:7837-7843.
31. Rhew R.C., Teh Y.A., Abel T. Methyl halide and methane fluxes in the northern Alaskan coastal tundra. Journal of Geophysical Research 2007, 112:G02009.
32. 2). Biogeosciences 2005, 2:125-132.
33. Seibt U., Kesselmeier J., Sandoval-Soto L., Kuhn U., Berry J.A. A kinetic analysis of leaf uptake of COS and its relation to transpiration, photosynthesis and carbon isotope fractionation. Biogeosciences 2010, 7:333-341.
34. Simmons J.S. Consumption of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide by coniferous boreal forest soils. Journal of Geophysical Research 1999, 104:11569-11576.
35. 2) between soil and atmosphere in a spruce forest in central Germany. Atmospheric Environment 2004, 38:6043-6052.
36. 2 during leaf gas exchange. New Phytologist 2010, 186:869-878.
37. Suntharalingam P., Kettle A.J., Montzka S.M., Jacob D.J. Global 3-D model analysis of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: implications for terrestrial vegetation uptake. Geophysical Research Letters 2008, 35:L19801.
38. Von Hobe M.V., Cutter G.A., Kettle A.J., Andreae M.O. Dark production: a significant source of oceanic COS. Journal of Geophysical Research 2001, 106:31217-31226.
39. Von Hobe M., Kettle A.J., Andreae M.O. Carbonyl sulphide in and over seawater: summer data from the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Atmospheric Environment 1999, 33:3503-3514.
40. Watts S.F. The mass budgets of carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, carbon disulfide and hydrogen sulfide. Atmospheric Environment 2000, 34:761-779.
41. 2. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2010, 10:547-561.
42. Xu X., Bingemer H.G., Schmidt U. The flux of carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide between the atmosphere and a spruce forest. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2002, 2:171-181.
43. Yi Z., Wang X., Sheng G., Fu J. Exchange of carbonyl sulfide (OCS) and dimethyl sulfide (DMS) between rice paddy fields and the atmosphere in subtropical China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2008, 123:116-124.
44. Yi Z., Wang X., Sheng G., Zhang D., Zhou G., Fu J. Soil uptake of carbonyl sulfide in subtropical forests with different successional stages in south China. Journal of Geophysical Research 2007, 112:D08302.