External costs of nuclear: Greater or less than the alternatives?

Energy Policy

Volumn 57, Issue , 2013, Pages 575-584

  Rabl, Ari ^a,b   Rabl, Veronika A ^c  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b Consulting on Environmental Impacts ^*  (France)

^c Vision and Results   (United States)

Author keywords

External costs; Nuclear energy; Renewables

Indexed keywords

EXTERNAL COSTS; HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT; HISTORICAL RECORDS; NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLES; NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS; NUCLEAR ELECTRICITY; RENEWABLES; U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION;

COST ESTIMATING; ESTIMATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; HEALTH RISKS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS; PLANT SHUTDOWNS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; FOSSIL FUEL; NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR POWER; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TRANSACTION COST; WIND POWER;

FUKUSHIMA; HONSHU; JAPAN; TOHOKU;

EID: 84876305852     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barbose, G.L., Goldman, C.A., Hoffman, I.M., Billingsley, M. 2013. The Future of Utility Customer-Funded Energy Efficiency Programs in the United States: Projected Spending and Savings to 2025. Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-5803E.
2. Boccard N. Capacity factor of wind power realized values vs. estimates. Energy Policy 2009, 37(2009):2679-2688.
3. Cardis, E., Krewski, D., Boniol, M., et al. (2006). The Cancer Burden from Chernobyl in Europe. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer Briefing Document, April 20. http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2006/IARCBriefingChernobyl.pdf.
4. Cochran, T.B., McKinzie, M.G. 2011. Global Implications of the Fukushima Disaster for Nuclear Power. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc, and World Federation of Scientists' International Seminars on Planetary Emergencies, Ettore Majorana Centre, Erice, Sicily, August 19-25, 2011. http://docs.nrdc.org/nuclear/nuc_11102801.asp.
5. Cour des Comptes 2012. "Les cots de la filière électronucléaire" (The costs of nuclear power). Rapport public thématique. January 2012. Cour des Comptes, 13 rue Cambon 75100 PARIS.
6. DEFRA 2005, The Social Costs of Carbon (SCC) Review-Methodological Approaches for Using SCC Estimates in Policy Assessment, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London. http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/what%20we%20do/a%20low%20carbon%20uk/carbon%20valuation/social_cost/aeat-scc-report.pdf.
7. DOE 2011. 2010 Solar Technology Market Report, US Department of Energy report DOE/GO-102011-3318, November 2011; . http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/51847.pdf.
8. DOE-NETL 2010. Improving the Efficiency of Coal-Fired Power Plants for Near Term Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions, DOE/NETL-2010/1411, April 2010.
9. EIA 2012a. Annual Energy Outlook, 2012. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2012).pdf.
10. EIA 2012b. Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2012. US Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/electricity_generation.cfm.
11. Esteban M., Zhang Q.I., Utama A. Estimation of the energy storage requirement of a future 100% renewable energy system in Japan. Energy Policy 2012, 47(2012):22-31.
12. EURELECTRIC 2010. Power Choices: Pathways to Carbon-Neutral Electricity in Europe by 2050, Full Report. The Union of the Electricity Industry, Brussels. Downloaded 3 May 2012 from . http://www.eurelectric.org/media/45274/power__choices_finalcorrection_page70_feb2011-2010-402-0001-01-e.pdf.
13. EURELECTRIC 2011. Power Statistics & Trends 2011-Synopsis. The Union of the Electricity Industry, Brussels. Downloaded 3 May 2012 from . http://www.eurelectric.org/PowerStats2011/PowerStats2011.asp.
14. ExternE 1995. ExternE: Externalities of Energy. ISBN 92-827-5210-0. Vol.5: Nuclear (EUR 16524). Published by European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Science Research and Development. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, L-2920 Luxembourg.
15. GAO 2009. NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT: Key Attributes, Challenges, and Costs of the Yucca Mountain Repository and Two Potential Alternatives. Highlights of GAO-10-48, a Report to Congressional Requesters. United States Government Accountability Office, Nov. 2009.
16. Hirschberg S., Burgherr P., Spiekerman G., Dones R. Severe accidents in the energy sector: comparative perspective. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2004, 111:57-65.
17. IAEA 2005. Chernobyl: The True Scale of the Accident. International Atomic Energy Agency, World Health Organization, and United Nations Development Programme. 2005. (accessed 07 Jan. 2012). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2005/pr38/en/index.html.
18. ICF 2011. Integrating Variable Renewable Electric Power Generators and the Natural Gas Infrastructure, ICF, Nov. 2011. http://www.icfi.com/insights/white-papers/2011/integrating-variable-renewable-electric-power-generators-natural-gas-infrastructure.
19. IEA 2008. World Energy Outlook 2008. International Energy Agency, 9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France. Available at . http://www.iea.org/Textbase/about/copyright.asp.
20. LBL 2012. "Recent Development in the Levelized Cost of Energy from U.S. Wind Power Projects," presentation by Ryan Wiser et al., Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, February 2012; . http://www.awea.org/_cs_upload/blog/14816_1.pdf.
21. Lightbucket 2008. The capacity factor of wind power. Wordpress 2008; . http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/the-capacity-factor-of-wind-power/.
22. Markandya A., Bigano A., Roberto Porchia R. The Social Cost of Electricity: Scenarios and Policy Implications. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei 2010, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, UK.
23. MWH 2009. Montgomery, Watson, Harza, Technical Analysis of Pumped Storage Integration with Wind Power in the Pacific Northwest Prepared by MWH Americas for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwest Division Hydroelectric Design Center, August 2009.
24. National Diet of Japan 2012. The Official Report of The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. Submitted 5 July 2012 to The National Diet of Japan. http://naiic.go.jp/en/.
25. NRC 2010. "Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use". National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Available from National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12794.
26. Ontario Hydro. 1993. Full Cost Accounting for Decision Making. Toronto: Ontario Hydro, 700 University Ave. H18 J18 Toronto, Ontario. December 1993.
27. ORNL/RFF 1994. Estimating Externalities of Nuclear Fuel Cycles. Vol.8 of External Costs and Benefits of Fuel Cycles. Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Resources for the Future. Edited by Russell Lee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. http://www.ornl.gov/info/reports/1995/3445604259148.pdf.
28. Rabl A. Discounting of long term costs: what would future generations prefer us to do?. Ecological Economics 1996, 17:137-145. 1996.
29. Sørensen B. Dependability of wind energy generators with short-term energy storage. Science 1976, 26:935-937. Nov. 1976.
30. Spadaro J.V., Rabl A. Estimating the uncertainty of damage costs of pollution: a simple transparent method and typical results. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2008, 28(2):166-183.
31. Stern N., et al. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, Available at.
32. Sustainability Victoria 2011.Victorian Wind Update: Quarter 4, 2011, Sustainability Victoria. http://www.sustainability.vic.gov.au/resources/documents/2011_Q4_Quarterly_Wind_Update.pdf.
33. Tol R.S.J. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 2005, 33:2064-2074.
34. von Hippel F.N. The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2011, 67(5):27-36.
35. Wilson R. Evacuation criteria after a nuclear accident: a personal perspective. Dose-Response, March 2012, 12.
36. Yasunari, T.J., Stohl, A., Hayano, R.S., Burkhart, J.F., Eckhardt, S., Yasunari, T. 2011. Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. PNAS 2011 108 (49) 19530-19534; published ahead of print November 14, 2011, doi:10.1073/pnas.1112058108; (accessed 07 Jan. 2012). http://www.pnas.org/content/108/49/19530.
37. York, D., Molina, M., Neubauer, M., Nowak, S., Nadel, S., Chittum, A., Elliott, N., Farley, K., Foster, B., Sachs, H., Witte, P. 2013. Frontiers of Energy Efficiency: Next Generation Programs Reach for High Energy Savings. American Council for and Energy-Efficient Economy. Report U131. http://www.aceee.org/research-report/u131.