Organic pollutants variation and antifouling enhancement with attapulgite clay addition in MBR treating micro-polluted surface water

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 223, Issue , 2013, Pages 891-898

  Yi, X S ^a   Zhao, Z W ^b   Shi, W X ^b   Duan, Y S ^b,c   Sun, N ^b   Ma, C ^b   Xie, Y Z ^d  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c China Northeast Architectural Design and Research Institute CO LTD   (China)

^d Nanhai Development Company Limited   (China)

Author keywords

Antifouling; Attapulgite clay; Membrane bioreactor (MBR); Micro polluted water

Indexed keywords

ANTIFOULING; ATTAPULGITE CLAY; DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTERS; EXCITATION EMISSION MATRICES; INORGANIC PRECIPITATION; MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM SILICATE; MEMBRANE BIO REACTOR (MBR); MICRO - POLLUTED WATERS;

ALUMINOSILICATES; AMINO ACIDS; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOREACTORS; MAGNESIUM; MANGANESE; MEMBRANE FOULING; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; SILICATE MINERALS; TURBIDITY; WATER POLLUTION; ZETA POTENTIAL;

CLAY DEPOSITS;

EID: 84876303062     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.110     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Chang W.K., Hu A.Y.J., Horng R.Y., et al. Membrane bioreactor with non-woven fabrics as solid-liquid separation media for wastewater treatment. Desalination 2007, 202:122-128.
2. Han W.Q., Wang L.J., Sun X.Y., et al. Treatment of bactericide wastewater by combined process chemical coagulation, electrochemical oxidation and membrane bioreactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151:306-315.
3. Remy M., Potier V., Temmink H., et al. Why low powdered activated carbon addition reduces membrane fouling in MBRs. Water Res. 2010, 44:861-867.
4. Sagbo Omer O., Sun Y., Hao A., et al. Effect of PAC addition on MBR process for drinking water treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 58:320-327.
5. Satyawali Y., Balakrishnan M. Performance enhancement with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating distillery effluent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170:457-465.
6. S. Han. The removal of taste and odor substances in water by attapulgite adsorption and enhanced coagulation, vol. 06, Master degree, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011. pp. 12-16.
7. Huang J., Liu Y., Wang X. Selective adsorption of tannin from flavonoids by organically modified attapulgite clay. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160:382-387.
8. Alkaram U.F., Mukhlis A.A., Al-Dujaili A.H. The removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption using surfactant-modified bentonite and kaolinite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169:324-332.
9. Pollice A., Brookes A., Jefferson B., et al. Sub-critical flux fouling in membrane bioreactors-a review of recent literature. Desalination 2005, 174:221-230.
10. Lee W., Kang S., Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 216:217-227.
11. Wang Z.S., Liu W.J. Micro-polluted Surface Water Treatment for Drinking Purpose 1999, China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing, pp. 47-49.
12. Fallah N., Bonakdarpour B., Nasernejad B., et al. Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of synthetic wastewater containing styrene as volatile organic compound (VOC): effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT). J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 178:718-724.
13. Nguyen L.N., Hai F.I., Kang J., et al. Removal of trace organic contaminants by a membrane bioreactor-granular activated carbon (MBR-GAC) system. Biores. Technol. 2012, 113:169-173.
14. Wang Zhiwei, Zhichao Wu, Yin Xing Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) under sub-critical flux operation: membrane foulant and gel layer characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:238-244.
15. Sheng G., Yu H. Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances of aerobic and anaerobic sludge using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res. 2006, 40:1233-1239.
16. Yi X.S., Yu S.L., Shi W.X., et al. Comparative study of anion polyacrylamide (APAM) adsorption-related fouling of a PVDF UF membrane and a modified PVDF UF membrane. Desalination 2012, 286:254-262.
17. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Amer-ican Public Health Association, 1995.
18. Sun F., Wang X., Li X. Effect of biopolymer clusters on the fouling property of sludge from a membrane bioreactor (MBR) and its control by ozonation. Process Biochem. 2011, 46:162-167.
19. Yu Z., Peldszus S., Huck P.M. Adsorption characteristics of selected pharmaceuticals and an endocrine disrupting compound-naproxen, carbamazepine and nonylphenol-on activated carbon. Water Res. 2008, 42:2873-2882.
20. Tadkaew N., Hai F.I., McDonald J.A., et al. Removal of trace organics by MBR treatment: the role of molecular properties. Water Res. 2011, 45:2439-2451.
21. Chang J.S., Chang C.Y., Chen A.C., et al. Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of high strength acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) wastewater: effect of hydraulic retention time. Desalination 2006, 191:45-51.
22. Chae S.R., Ahna Y.T., Kang S.T., et al. Mitigated membrane fouling in a vertical submerged membrane bioreactor (VSMBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:572-581.
23. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
24. Meng F., Yang F., Shi B., et al. A comprehensive study on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors operated under different aeration intensities. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 59:91-100.
25. Bai R., Leow H.F. Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater-the effect of system operation parameters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 29:189-198.
26. Bae T.H., Tak T.M. Interpretation of fouling characteristics of ultrafiltration membranes during the filtration of membrane bioreactor mixed liquor. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264:151-160.
27. Wang Z., Mei X., Wu Z., et al. Effects of biopolymer discharge from MBR mixture on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 193-194:77-87.
28. Wilén B.M., Jin B., Lant P. The influence of key chemical constituents in activated sludge on surface and flocculating properties. Water Res. 2003, 37:127-139.
29. Staudt C., Horn H., Hempel D.C., et al. Volumetric measurements of bacterial cells and extracellular polymeric substance glycoconjugates in biofilms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88:585-592.
30. Baker A. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:948-953.
31. Pullin M.J., Cabaniss S.E. Rank analysis of the pH-dependent synchronous fluorescence spectra of six standard humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29:1460-1467.
32. 3. Desalination 2011, 281:179-184.
33. Seidel A., Elimelech M. Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implication for fouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 203:245-255.
34. You H.S., Huang C.P., Pan J.R., et al. Behavior of membrane scaling during crossflow filtration in the anaerobic MBR system. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41:1265-1278.