Alloplastic bypass material below the knee: Actual rationale

Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 54, Issue 1 SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages 159-166

  Debus, E S ^a   Larena Avellaneda, A ^a   Heimlich, F ^b   Goertz, J ^b   Fein, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HEART CENTER HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ischemia; Limb salvage; Stents

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BELOW KNEE PROSTHESIS; COMORBIDITY; DACRON IMPLANT; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT PATENCY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LIMB SALVAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GRAFT OCCLUSION; INSTRUMENTATION; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LEG; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTHESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; TRANSPLANTATION; VASCULAR PATENCY; VASCULARIZATION;

POLITEF; POLYESTER; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LIMB SALVAGE; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; POLYESTERS; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876302304     PISSN: 00219509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Albers M, Battistella VM, Romiti M Rodrigues et al. Meta-analysis of polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafts to ¡nfrapopliteal arteries. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:1263-9. (Pubitemid 41123104)
2. Pereira CE, Albers M, Romiti M et al. Meta-analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity arterial insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:510-7.
3. Taylor LM Jr, Porter JM. Clinical and anatomic considerations for surgery in femoropopliteal disease and the results of surgery. Circulation 1991;83:163-19.
4. Pappas PJ, Hobson RW, Meyers MG et al. Patency of infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafts with distal interposition vein cuffs. Cardiovasc Surg 1998;6:19-26. (Pubitemid 28053850)
5. Arvela E, Söderström M, Albäck A et al. Arm vein conduit vs. prosthetic graft in infrainguinal revascularization for critical leg ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:616-23.
6. Hobson RW, Lynch TG, Jamil Z et al. Results of revascularization and amputation in severe lower extremity ischemia: a five-year clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 1985;2:174-85. (Pubitemid 15054143)
7. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E et al. Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:104-14. (Pubitemid 16186498)
8. Takagi H, Goto SN, Matsui M et al. A contemporary analysis of Dacron vs. polytetrafluoroethylene grafts fpr femoro-popliteal bypass grafting. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:232-36.
9. van Det RJ, Virens BHR, van der Palen J et al. Dacron or ePTFE for femoro-popliteal above-knee bypass grafting: Short and long-term results of a multicentre randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37:457-63.
10. Post S, Kraus T, Muller-Reinartz U et al. Dacron vs. polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for femoropopliteal bypass: a prospective randomised multicentre trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001;22:226-31. (Pubitemid 32780787)
11. Robinson BI, Fletcher JP, Tomlinson P et al. A prospective randomized multicentre comparison of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and gelatin-sealed knitted Dacron grafts for femoropopliteal bypass. Cardiovasc Surg 1999;7:214-8. (Pubitemid 29191508)
12. Smeets L, Ho GH, Tangelder MJ et al. Outcome after occlusion of infrainguinal bypasses in the Dutch BOA Study: comparison of amputation rate in venous and prosthetic grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;30:604-9. (Pubitemid 41782534)
13. Dorigo W, Pulli R, Castelli P et al. A multicenter comparison between autologous saphenous vein and heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft in the treatment of critical limb ischemia in diabetics. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:1332-8.
14. Halloran BG, Lilly MP, Cohn EJ et al. Tibial bypass using complex autologous conduit: patency and limb salvage. Ann Vasc Surg 2001;15:634-43. (Pubitemid 33115647)
15. Kreienberg PB, Darling RC, III, Chang BB et al. Early results of a prospective randomized trial of spliced vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene graft with a distal vein cuff for limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:299-306.
16. Neufang A, Espinola-Klein C, Dorweiler B et al. Femoropopliteal prosthetic bypass with glutaraldehyde stabilized human umbilical vein (HUV). J Vasc Surg 2007;46:280-8. (Pubitemid 47102085)
17. Matia I, Janousek L, Marada T et al. Cold-stored venous allografts in the treatment of critical limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;34:424-31. (Pubitemid 47400230)
18. Panneton JM, Gloviczki P, Bower TC et al. Pedal bypass for limb salvage: impact of diabetes on long-term outcome. Ann Vasc Surg 2000;14:640-7.
19. Raptis S, Miller JH. Influence of a vein cuff on polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for primary femoropopliteal bypass. Br J Surg 1995;82:487-91.
20. Goshima KR, Mills JL Sr, Hughes JD. A new look at outcomes after infrainguinal bypass surgery: traditional reporting standards systematically underestimate the expenditure of effort required to attain limb salvage. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:330-5. (Pubitemid 38174314)
21. Faries PL, Logerfo FW, Arora S et al. A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: all-autogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:1080-90.
22. Parsons RE, Suggs WD, Veith FJ et al. Polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses to infrapopliteal arteries without cuffs or patches: a better option than amputation in patients without autologous vein. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:347-54.
23. Moxey PW, Hofman D, Hinchliffe RJ et al. Trends and outcomes after surgical lower limb revascularization in England. Br J Surg 2011;98:1373-82.
24. Eugster T, Marti R, Gurke L et al. Ten years after artereial bypass surgery for claudication: Venous bypass is the primary procedure for TASC C and D Lesions. World J Surg 2011;35:2328-31.
25. Tyrrell MR, Wolfe JH. New prosthetic venous collar anastomotic technique: combining the best of other procedures. Br J Surg 1991;78:1016-7.
26. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:517-38. (Pubitemid 27408567)
27. Debus ES, Timmermann W, Sailer M et al. Arterial reconstruction in diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results in 192 patients. Vasa 1998;27:240-3. (Pubitemid 28525269)
28. Hallin A, Bergqvist D, Fugl-Meyer K et al. Areas of concern, quality of life and life satisfaction in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:255-63. (Pubitemid 41079356)
29. Kent KC, Bartek S, Kuntz KM et al. Prospective study of wound complications in continuous infrainguinal incisions after lower limb arterial reconstruction: incidence, risk factors, and cost. Surgery 1996;119:378-83. (Pubitemid 26115829)
30. Sandford RM, Bown MJ, Sayers RD et al. Is infrainguinal bypass grafting successful following failed angioplasty? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;34:29-34. (Pubitemid 46852378)
31. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J et al. Bypass versus angioplasty in sever ischaemia of the leg (BASIL) trial: Analysis of amputation free and overall survival by treatment received. J Vasc Surg 2010;51:18S-31S.
32. Plecha EJ, Seabrook GR, Bandyk DF et al. Determinants of successful peroneal artery bypass. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:97-105.