Cutting the Gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 666-686

  Ganco, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

complexity; employee entrepreneurship; employee mobility; knowledge diffusion; NK model

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS; COMPLEXITY; EMPLOYEE MOBILITY; KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION; NK MODELS; PATENTING ACTIVITIES; SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY; TRANSFER OF KNOWLEDGE;

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURE;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84876302039     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2044     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar M,. 2004. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin-out generation, development, and survival. Academy of Management Journal 47 (4): 501-522.
2. Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis RH,. 2009. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management Journal 30 (13): 1349-1374.
3. Agrawal A,. 2006. Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 27 (1): 63-79.
4. Aldrich HE, Fiol CM,. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review 19 (4): 645-670.
5. Almeida P, Kogut B,. 1999. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science 45 (7): 905-917.
6. Anton JJ, Yao DA,. 1995. Start-ups, spin-offs, and internal projects. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11 (2): 362-378.
7. Brittain J, Freeman JH,. 1980. Organizational proliferation and density dependent selection. In Organizational Life Cycles, Kimberly J, Miles M, (eds). Jessey-Bass: San Francisco, CA; 291-338.
8. Busenitz LW, Barney JB,. 1997. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing 12 (1): 9-30.
9. Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco A, Agarwal R,. 2012. Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, employee entrepreneurship, and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 33 (1): 65-87.
10. Cassiman B, Ueda M,. 2006. Optimal project rejection and new firm start-ups. Management Science 52 (2): 262-275.
11. Chatterji AK,. 2009. Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal 30 (2): 185-206.
12. Computer History Museum 2009. http://www.computerhistory.org (accessed 5 May 2009)
13. Corporate History 2009. http://www.garmin.com (accessed 12 May 2009).
14. Cypress Semiconductor 2009. MOS is metal oxide semiconductor. http://www.cypress.com (accessed 3 May 2009).
15. Dosi G, Grazzi M,. 2010. On the nature of technologies: knowledge, procedures, artifacts and production inputs. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 173-184.
16. Dushnitsky G, Shapira Z,. 2010. Entrepreneurial finance meets corporate reality: comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management Journal 31 (9): 990-1017.
17. Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB,. 1990. Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (3): 504-529.
18. Elfenbein DW, Hamilton BH, Zenger TR,. 2010. The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Science 56 (4): 659-681.
19. Fleming L, Sorenson O,. 2001. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research Policy 30 (7): 1019-1039.
20. Fleming L, Sorenson O,. 2004. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal 25 (8-9): 909-928.
21. Fortune A, Mitchell W,. 2012. Unpacking firm exit at the firm and industry levels: the adaptation and selection of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 33 (7): 794-819.
22. Franco AM, Filson D,. 2006. Spin-outs: knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. The Rand Journal of Economics 37 (4): 841-860.
23. Freeman J,. 1986. Entrepreneurs as organizational products: semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. In Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, Libecap GD, (ed). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 33-52.
24. Ganco M, Agarwal R,. 2009. Performance differentials between diversifying entrants and entrepreneurial start-ups: a complexity approach. Academy of Management Review 34 (2): 228-252.
25. Garvin DA,. 1983. Spin-offs and the new firm formation process. California Management Review 25 (2): 3-20.
26. Gavetti G, Levinthal D,. 2000. Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 113-137.
27. Grant RM,. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17: 109-122.
28. Hall BH, Ziedonis RH,. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. The Rand Journal of Economics 32 (1): 101-128.
29. Helfat CE, Lieberman MB,. 2002. The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (4): 725-760.
30. Hellman T,. 2007. When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Science 53 (6): 919-933.
31. Hoetker G,. 2007. The use of Logit and Probit models in strategic management research: critical issues. Strategic Management Journal 28 (4): 331-343.
32. Hoetker G, Agarwal R,. 2007. Death hurts, but it isn't fatal: the postexit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2): 446-467.
33. Hoisl K,. 2007. Tracing mobile inventors-the causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity. Research Policy 36 (5): 619-636.
34. Jaffe AB,. 1989. Characterizing the 'technological position' of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Research Policy 18 (2): 87-97.
35. Kauffman SA,. 1993. The Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press: New York.
36. Kenney M, Florida R,. 2002. Venture capital in Silicon Valley: fueling new firm formation. In Understanding Silicon Valley, Kenney M, (ed). Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA; 98-123.
37. Khessina OM, Carroll GR,. 2008. Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983-1999. Organization Science 19 (1): 25-38.
38. Kim J, Marschke G,. 2005. Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm's patenting decision. The Rand Journal of Economics 36 (2): 298-317.
39. Kirzner IM,. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature 35 (1): 60-85.
40. Klepper S,. 2007. Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science 53 (4): 616-631.
41. Klepper S, Sleeper S,. 2005. Entry by spinoffs. Management Science 51 (8): 1291-1306.
42. Klepper S, Thompson P,. 2010. Disagreements and intra-industry spinoffs. International Journal of Industrial Organization 28 (5): 526-538.
43. Kogut B, Zander U,. 1996. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7 (5): 502-518.
44. Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY,. 2010. Does interdependency affect firm and industry profitability? An empirical test. Strategic Management Journal 31: 121-139.
45. Levinthal DA,. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science 43 (7): 934-950.
46. Lowe RA,. 2002. Invention, innovation and entrepreneurship: the commercialization of university research by inventor-founded firms. Unpublished diss., University of California: Berkeley, CA.
47. Macher JT, Mowery DC, Hodges DA,. 1998. Reversal of fortune? The recovery of the US semiconductor industry. California Management Review 41 (1): 107-136.
48. Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L,. 2009. Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Science 55 (6): 875-889.
49. Mitchell W,. 1991. Dual clocks: entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management Journal 12 (2): 85-100.
50. National Inventors Hall of Fame Foundation, Inc 2009. http://www.invent.org/hall-of-fame/55.html (accessed 15 May 2009).
51. Nelson RR, Winter SG,. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
52. Nickerson JA, Zenger TR,. 2004. A knowledge-based theory of the firm-the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science 15 (6): 617-632.
53. Pitta J., 1997. Federico Faggin: the electronic brain. Forbes.com, 7 July. http://www.forbes.com/forbes/1997/0707/6001312a.html (accessed 17 April 2009).
54. Phillips DJ,. 2002. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: the parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (3): 474-506.
55. Polanyi M,. 1983. The Tacit Dimension. Reprinted by Peter Smith: Gloucester, MA.
56. QuickLogic 2009. http://www.quicklogic.com (accessed 21 March 2009).
57. Rivkin JW,. 2000. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science 46 (6): 824-844.
58. Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N,. 2002. Organizational sticking points on NK landscapes. Complexity 7: 31-43.
59. Rosenkopf L, Almeida P,. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science 49 (6): 751-766.
60. Sarasvathy SD,. 2001. Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review 26 (2): 243-263.
61. Sarasvathy D, Simon HA, Lave L,. 1998. Perceiving and managing business risks: differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 33 (2): 207-225.
62. Shane S,. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science 11 (4): 448-469.
63. Shane S, Venkataraman S,. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25 (1): 217-226.
64. Singh J, Agrawal AK,. 2011. Recruiting for ideas: how firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Science 57 (1): 129-150.
65. Singh J, Fleming L,. 2010. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: myth or reality? Management Science 56 (1): 41-56.
66. Sørensen JB,. 2007. Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (3): 387-412.
67. Sorenson O, Audia PG,. 2000. The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940-1989. American Journal of Sociology 106 (2): 424-462.
68. Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L,. 2006. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy 35 (7): 994-1017.
69. Stuart TE, Sorenson O,. 2003. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2): 175-201.
70. Teece DJ,. 2003. Expert talent and the design of (professional services) firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (4): 895-916.
71. Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM,. 2006. Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organization Science 17 (6): 691-709.
72. Williams C,. 2007. Transfer in context: replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationships. Strategic Management Journal 28 (9): 867-889.
73. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B,. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316 (5827): 1036-1040.