Early diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion-weighted imaging lesion volumes forecast final infarct size in DEFUSE 2

Stroke

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 681-685

  Wheeler, Hayley M ^a   Mlynash, Michael ^a   Inoue, Manabu ^a   Tipirneni, Aaryani ^a   Liggins, John ^a   Zaharchuk, Greg ^a   Straka, Matus ^a   Kemp, Stephanie ^a   Bammer, Roland ^a   Lansberg, Maarten G ^a   Albers, Gregory W ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion weighted imaging; Irreversible injury; Ischemic; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion weighted imaging; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN EDEMA; BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN SIZE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPERFUSION;

AGED; BRAIN INFARCTION; COHORT STUDIES; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; STROKE;

EID: 84876284150     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000135     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Albers GW, Thijs VN, Wechsler L, Kemp S, Schlaug G, Skalabrin E, et al.; DEFUSE Investigators. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:508-517.
2. Campbell BC, Purushotham A, Christensen S, Desmond PM, Nagakane Y, Parsons MW, et al.; EPITHET-DEFUSE Investigators. The infarct core is well represented by the acute diffusion lesion: sustained reversal is infrequent. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:50-56.
3. Lansberg MG, Lee J, Christensen S, Straka M, De Silva DA, Mlynash M, et al. RAPID automated patient selection for reperfusion therapy: a pooled analysis of the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET) and the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) Study. Stroke. 2011;42:1608-1614.
4. Purushotham A, Campbell BCV, Straka M, Mlynash M, Olivot JM, Bammer R, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient threshold for delineation of ischemic core. Int J Stroke. In press.
5. Olivot JM, Mlynash M, Thijs VN, Kemp S, Lansberg MG, Wechsler L., et al. Optimal Tmax threshold for predicting penumbral tissue in acute stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:469-475.
6. Zaro-Weber O, Moeller-Hartmann W, Heiss WD, Sobesky J. Maps of time to maximum and time to peak for mismatch definition in clinical stroke studies validated with positron emission tomography. Stroke. 2010;41:2817-2821.
7. Dani KA, Thomas RG, Chappell FM, Shuler K, MacLeod MJ, Muir KW, et al.; Translational Medicine Research Collaboration Multicentre Acute Stroke Imaging Study. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in ischemic stroke: definitions and thresholds. Ann Neurol. 2011;70: 384-401.
8. Lansberg MG, Straka M, Kemp S, Mlynash M, Wechsler LR, Jovin TG, et al.; DEFUSE 2 study investigators. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:860-867.
9. Straka M, Albers GW, Bammer R. Real-time diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32: 1024-1037.
10. McAuliffe MJ, Lalonde FM, McGarry D, Gandler W, Csaky K, Trus BL. Medical image processing, analysis & visualization in clinical research. IEEE Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). 2001; 381-386.
11. Tipirneni A, Straka M, Lansberg MG, Mlynash M, Bammer R, Parsons MW, et al. A Novel Method for Quantification of Brain Edema in Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:A50.
12. Rousseeuw P. J. SAS procedure 'robustreg', "Least Median of Squares Regression". J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79:871-880.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.