The Public Health Impact score: A new measure of public health effectiveness for general practices in England

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 63, Issue 609, 2013, Pages

  Ashworth, Mark ^a   Schofield, Peter ^a   Doran, Tim ^b   Cookson, Richard ^c   Sutton, Matthew ^b   Seed, Paul T ^d   Howe, Amanda ^e   Fleetcroft, Robert ^f  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e Department of Primary Care ^*  (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health outcomes; Population mortality reduction; Primary health care

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; INFLUENZA VACCINE;

AGE; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; INFLUENZA; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SCORING SYSTEM; UNITED KINGDOM;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84876262914     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X665260     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005; 83(3): 457-502.
2. Pearson SD, Schneider EC, Kleinman KP, et al. The impact of pay-forperformance on health care quality in Massachusetts, 2001-2003. Health Aff 2008; 27(4): 1167-1176.
3. Roland M. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care - a major experiment in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(14): 1448-1454.
4. Kindig DA. A pay-for-population health performance system. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 296(21): 2611-2613.
5. Department of Health. Transparency in outcomes - a framework for the NHS. London: DoH, 2010.
6. Department of Health. Healthy lives, healthy people: our strategy for public health in England. London: DoH, 2010.
7. HM Government. Quality and Outcomes Framework - 2009-10, England level. http://data.gov.uk/dataset/quality-And-outcomes-framework-Achievement-data (accessed 4 Mar 2013).
8. Department for Communities and Local Government. English indices of deprivation 2010. London: Crown Copyright, 2011. http://www.communities.gov. uk/publications/corporate/statistics/indices2010 (accessed 4 Mar 2013).
9. Office for National Statistics . A beginners' guide to geography. http://www.ons. gov.uk/ons/guide-method/geography/beginner-s-guide/index.html (accessed 4 Mar 2013).
10. Strong M, Maheswaran R, Radford J. Socioeconomic deprivation, coronary heart disease prevalence and quality of care: a practice-level analysis in Rotherham using data from the new UK general practitioner Quality and Outcomes Framework. J Public Health 2006; 28(1): 39-42.
11. Fleetcroft R, Parekh-Bhurke S, Howe A, et al. The UK pay-for-performance programme in primary care: estimation of population mortality reduction. Br J Gen Pract 2010; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X515359.
12. Fleetcroft R, Parekh S, Steel N, et al. Joint executive summary: potential population health gain of the quality and Outcomes Framework. Report to the Department of Health. York: Centre for Health Economics, 2008. http://www.york.ac.uk/che/pdf/jointexecutivesummaryUEA-York-%20270308final.pdf (accessed 4 Mar 2013).
13. Raffle AE, Alden B, Quinn M, et al. Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: analysis of cumulative incidence of cervical abnormality and modelling of cases and deaths prevented. BMJ 2003; 326(7395): 901-904.
14. British Medical Association. NHS Employers, Quality and Outcomes Framework guidance for GMS contract 2019/10. London: NHS Confederation (Employers) Company Ltd, 2009. http://www.nhsemployers.org/Aboutus/Publications/ Documents/QOF-Guidance-2009-final.pdf (accessed 4 Mar 2013).
15. Freeman G, Hughes J. Continuity of care and the patient experience. London: The Kings Fund, 2010.
16. Office for National Statistics. Death registrations summary table, England and Wales, 2009, (final). http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/death-reg- sumtables/2009-final-/index.html (accessed 4 Mar 2013).
17. Walker S, Mason AR, Claxton K, et al. Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS. Br J Gen Pract 2010; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X501859.
18. Simonsen L, Taylor RJ, Viboud C, et al. Mortality benefits of influenza vaccination in elderly people: an ongoing controversy. Lancet Infect Dis 2007; 7(10): 658- 666.
19. Siu AL, McGlynn EA, Morgenstern H, et al. Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health. Health Serv Res 1992; 27(5): 619-650.
20. McElduff P, Lyratzopoulos G, Edwards R, et al. Will changes in primary care improve health outcomes? Modelling the impact of financial incentives introduced to improve quality of care in the UK. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13(3): 191-197.
21. McColl A, Roderick P, Gabbay J, et al. Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence approach. BMJ 1998; 317(7169): 1354-1360.
22. Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians; Ginsburg JA, Doherty RB, Ralston JF Jr, et al. Achieving a high-performance health care system with universal access: what the United States can learn from other countries. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148(1): 55-75.
23. Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. London: DoH, 2010.