Semi-automated argumentative analysis of online product reviews

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 245, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 43-50

  Wyner, Adam ^b   Schneider, Jodi ^a   Atkinson, Katie ^b   Bench Capon, Trevor ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation schemes; Social media; Text analysis

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

'CURRENT; ARGUMENT IDENTIFICATIONS; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES; ONLINE PRODUCT REVIEWS; PROPERTY; RULE BASED; SEMI-AUTOMATICS; SOCIAL MEDIA; TEXT ANALYSIS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84876258408     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-43     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. K. Atkinson and T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10-15):855-874, 2007.
2. H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and V. Tablan. GATE: A framework and graphical development environment for robust NLP tools and applications. In Proceedings of the 40th Anniversary Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02), pages 168-175, 2002.
3. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-358, 1995.
4. U. Egly, S. A. Gaggl, and S. Woltran. ASPARTIX: Implementing argumentation frameworks using answer-set programming. In M. G. de la Banda and E. Pontelli, editors, ICLP, volume 5366 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 734-738. Springer, 2008.
5. S. Heras, K. Atkinson, V. J. Botti, F. Grasso, V. Julían, and P. McBurney. How argumentation can enhance dialogues in social networks. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, and G. R. Simari, editors, COMMA, volume 216 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 267-274. IOS Press, 2010.
6. A. D. Liddo and S. B. Shum. Cohere: A prototype for contested collective intelligence. In ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2010) -Workshop: Collective Intelligence In Organizations -Toward a Research Agenda, Savannah, Georgia, USA, February 2010.
7. R. Mitkof, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford University Press, 2003.
8. F. A. Nielsen. A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. CoRR, abs/1103.2903, 2011.
9. V. Pallotta and R. Delmonte. Automatic argumentative analysis for interaction mining. Argument and Computation, 2(2-3):77-106, 2011.
10. B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2):1-135, Jan. 2008.
11. G. Rowe and C. Reed. Argument diagramming: The Araucaria Project. In A. Okada, S. B. Shum, and T. Sherborne, editors, Knowledge Cartography: Software Tools and Mapping Techniques, pages 163-181. Springer, 2008.
12. P. Saint-Dizier. Processing natural language arguments with the platform. Argument & Computation, 3(1):49-82, 2012.
13. F. Toni and P. Torroni. Bottom-up argumentation. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on the Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (TAFA11), volume 11, pages 291-303, Barcelona, Spain, 2011.
14. T. van Gelder. The rationale for Rationale. Law, Probability and Risk, 6(1-4):23-42, 2007.
15. D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J., 1996.
16. D. Walton and E. Krabbe. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. SUNY series in logic and language. State University of New York Press, 1995.
17. B. Webber, M. Egg, and V. Kordoni. Discourse structure and language technology. Natural Language Engineering, December 2011. Online first.
18. A. Wyner and W. Peters. On rule extraction from regulations. In K. Atkinson, editor, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems -JURIX 2011: The Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference, pages 113-122. IOS Press, 2011.