-
1
-
-
84864449934
-
Clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance: The Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study
-
Khalili D, Hadaegh F, Soori H, et al. Clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance:the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(3):177-186.
-
(2012)
Am J Epidemiol.
, vol.176
, Issue.3
, pp. 177-186
-
-
Khalili, D.1
Hadaegh, F.2
Soori, H.3
-
2
-
-
33750905259
-
Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models
-
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis:a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(6):565-574.
-
(2006)
Med Decis Making.
, vol.26
, Issue.6
, pp. 565-574
-
-
Vickers, A.J.1
Elkin, E.B.2
-
3
-
-
58149269742
-
Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method forevaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers
-
Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB, et al. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method forevaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMCMed Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:53.
-
(2008)
BMCMed Inform Decis Mak.
, vol.8
, pp. 53
-
-
Vickers, A.J.1
Cronin, A.M.2
Elkin, E.B.3
-
4
-
-
72949090243
-
Putting risk prediction in perspective:relative utility curves
-
Baker SG. Putting risk prediction in perspective:relative utility curves. JNatl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(22):1538-1542.
-
(2009)
JNatl Cancer Inst.
, vol.101
, Issue.22
, pp. 1538-1542
-
-
Baker, S.G.1
-
5
-
-
67650046515
-
Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction
-
Baker SG, Cook NR, Vickers A, et al. Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009;172(4):729-748.
-
(2009)
J R Stat Soc ser A Stat Soc.
, vol.172
, Issue.4
, pp. 729-748
-
-
Baker, S.G.1
Cook, N.R.2
Vickers, A.3
-
6
-
-
0016757157
-
Therapeutic decision making:acost-benefit analysis
-
Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. Therapeutic decision making:acost-benefit analysis. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(5):229-234.
-
(1975)
N Engl J Med.
, vol.293
, Issue.5
, pp. 229-234
-
-
Pauker, S.G.1
Kassirer, J.P.2
-
7
-
-
84876453962
-
-
University Of Washington Biostatistics Working Paper Series, working paper 384). Berkeley, CA:bepress Accessed December 23, 2012
-
Pepe MS, Janes H. Methodsfor Evaluating Prediction Performance of Biomarkers and Tests. (University of Washington Biostatistics Working Paper Series, working paper 384). Berkeley, CA:bepress; 2012. (http://biostats. bepress.com/ uwbiostat/paper384). (Accessed December23, 2012).
-
(2012)
Methodsfor Evaluating Prediction Performance of Biomarkers and Tests
-
-
Pepe, M.S.1
Janes, H.2
-
8
-
-
84864458749
-
Invited commentary:clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance
-
D'Agostino RB, Pencina MJ. Invited commentary:clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 176(3):187-189.
-
(2012)
Am J Epidemiol.
, vol.176
, Issue.3
, pp. 187-189
-
-
D'Agostino, R.B.1
Pencina, M.J.2
|