On sibling designs

Epidemiology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 473-474

  Keyes, Katherine M ^a   Smith, George Davey ^b   Susser, Ezra ^a  

^a New York State Psychiatric Institute ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRTH ORDER; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FAMILY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LETTER; MATERNAL AGE; PATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIBLING; SMOKING;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); HUMANS; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; SIBLINGS; TWIN STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84876244503     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828c7381     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Donovan SJ, Susser E. Commentary: Advent of sibling designs. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:345-349.
2. Frisell T, Öberg S, Kuja-Halkola R, Sjölander A. Sibling comparison designs: bias from non-shared confounders and measurement error. Epidemiology. 2012;23:713-720
3. Davey Smith G. Epidemiology, epigenetics and the 'Gloomy Prospect': embracing randomness in population health research and practice. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:537-562.
4. Bound J, Solon G. Double trouble: on the value of twins-based estimation of the return to schooling. Econ Educ Rev. 1999;18:169-182.