Deriving weights from group fuzzy pairwise comparison judgement matrices

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Volumn 206 AISC, Issue , 2013, Pages 545-555

  Almulhim, Tarifa S ^a   Mikhailov, Ludmil ^a   Xu, Dong Ling ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fuzzy Non linear Programming; Fuzzy Preferences Programming Method; Multiple Criteria Decision Making; Triangular Fuzzy Number

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

FUZZY PAIR-WISE COMPARISONS; FUZZY PREFERENCES; FUZZY PRIORITIZATION; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRICES; TRIANGULAR FUZZY NUMBERS;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 84876241870     PISSN: 21945357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36981-0_50     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Choo, E., Wedley, W.: A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Computers & Operations Research 31, 893-908 (2004)
2. Ittersum, K.V., Pennings, J.M., Wansink, B., van Trijp, H.C.: The validity of attribute-importance measurement: A review. Journa of Business Research 60, 1177-1190 (2007)
3. Edwards, W.: How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 7, 326-340 (1977)
4. Von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.: Decision analysis and behavioural research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
5. Edwards, W., Barron, F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60, 306-325 (1994)
6. Thurstone, L.: A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 34, 273-286 (1927)
7. Saaty, T.L.: The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, Priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, NY (1980)
8. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with dependence and feedback: the Analytic Network Process. RWA Publications, PA (1996)
9. Brans, J., Mareschal, B.: Promethee methods: In multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science 78, 163-186 (2005)
10. Xu, D.L., Yang, J.B., Lama, J.: Group-based ER-AHP system for product project screening. Expert Systems with Applications 35, 1909-1929 (2008)
11. Chu, A., Kalaba, R., Springam, K.: A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Application 27, 531-541 (1979)
12. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Comparison of Eigenvalue, Logarithmic Least Squares and Least Squares Methods in Estimating Rations. Mathematical Modelling 5, 309-324 (1984)
13. Mikhailov, L.: A Fuzzy Programming Method for Deriving Prioritises in Analytic Hierarchy Process. The Journal of Operational Research Society 51, 341-349 (2000)
14. Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis. Fuzzy Sets and System 17, 233-247 (1984)
15. Laarhoven, P.J.M., Pedrycz, W.: A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and System 11, 229-241 (1983)
16. Chang, D.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95, 649-655 (1996)
17. Mikhailov, L.: Deriving priorities from fuzzy pair-wise comparison judgments. Fuzzy Sets and System 134, 365-385 (2003)
18. Tiwari, R.N., Dharmar, S., Rao, J.R.: Fuzzy goal programming-an additive model. Fuzzy Sets and System 24, 27-34 (1987)
19. Higham, D.J., Higham, N.J.: MATLAB Guide, 2nd edn. SIAM (2005)
20. Mikhailov, L., Didehkhani, H., Sadi-Nezhad, S.: Weighted Prioritization Models in the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10, 681-694 (2011)