Wind conditions and resource assessment

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 206-217

  Petersen, Erik Lundtang ^a   Troen, Ib ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX FUNCTIONS; ENERGY SOURCE; LARGE-SCALE DYNAMICS; METEOROLOGICAL MODELS; RESOURCE ASSESSMENTS; SITE-SPECIFIC; WIND CONDITIONS; WIND RESOURCES;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS; WIND POWER;

WIND TURBINES;

EID: 84876162073     PISSN: 20418396     EISSN: 2041840X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wene.4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Global Observing System. World Meteorological Organization. Available at: http://www.wmo.int. (Accessed June 6, 2012).
2. Christiansen M, Bruun W, Koch J, Horstman C, Bay Hasager, Nielsen M. Wind resource assessment from C-band SAR. Remote Sensing Environ 2006, 105:68-81.
3. Badger M, Badger J, Nielsen M, Hasager CB, Pena Diaz A. Wind class sampling of satellite SAR imagery for offshore wind resource mapping. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 2010, 49:2474-2491.
4. Troen I, Petersen EL. European Wind Atlas. Roskilde, Denmark: Risoe National Laboratory; 1989, 656.
5. European Wind Energy Association. Wind Energy-The Facts; 2009. Available at: http://windfacts.eu.
6. Raupach MR. Simplified expressions for vegetation roughness length and zero-plane displacement as functions of canopy height and area index. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 1994, 71:211-216.
7. Weng W, Taylor PA, Salmon JR. A 2-D numerical model of boundary-layer flow over single and multiple surface condition changes. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2010, 98:121-132.
8. Jensen NO, Petersen EL, Troen I. Extrapolation of Mean Wind Statistics with special regard to Wind Energy Applications. World Climate Programme: Geneva, Switzerland; 1984, 88.
9. Frandsen S, Barthelmie R, Rathmann S, Pryor Larsen S, Højstrup J, Thøgersen M. Analytical modelling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 2006, 9:39-53.
10. Smith RB. Gravity wave effects on wind farm efficiency. Wind Energy 2010, 13:449-458.
11. Ott S, Berg J, Nielsen M. Linearised CFD Models for Wakes. Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory; 2011, 39. Risø-R-1772.
12. Jackson PS, Hunt JCR. Turbulent flow over a low hill. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 1975, 101:833-851.
13. Troen I. On diagnostic wind field models. In: Lalas DP, Ratto CF, eds. Modelling of Atmospheric Flow Fields. Singapore, New Jersey, London, Hong Kong: World Scientific 1996.
14. Mason PJ, Sykes RI. Flow over an isolated hill of moderate slope. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 1979, 105:383-395.
15. Walmsley JL, Taylor PA, Keith T. A simple model for neutrally stratified boundary-layer flow over complex terrain with surface roughness modulations (MS3DJH/3R). Boundary-Layer Meteorol 1986, 36:157-186.
16. Skamarock WC. Evaluating mesoscale NWP models using kinetic energy spectra. Mon WEA Rev 2004, 132:3019-3032.
17. Warner TT. Numerical Weather and Climate Prediction. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011, 526.
18. Taylor PA, Teunissen HW. The Askervein hill project: overview and background data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 1987, 39:15-19.
19. Sorensen NN, Bechmann A, Johansen J, Myllerup L, Botha P, Vinthet S, Nielsen BS. Identification of Severe Wind Conditions Using a Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Solver. Lyngby, Denmark: Proc. Conference on the Science of Making Torque from Wind; 2007.
20. Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ. Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows. Their Structure and Measurement. New York: Oxford University Press 1994, 289.
21. In general: The conference proceedings published yearly by the European Wind Energy Association EWEA), The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) and the British Wind Energy Association (BWEA)
22. The Wiley Journal Wind Energy It is recommended to use an available search engine to access the World Wide Web for more information on the topics treated in this chapter.