Aesthetic evaluation after non-invasive treatment for superficial basal cell carcinoma

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 647-650

  Mosterd, K ^a   Arits, A H M M ^a   Nelemans, P J ^b   Kelleners Smeets, N W J ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUOROURACIL; IMIQUIMOD;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BASAL CELL CARCINOMA; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DERMATOLOGICAL PROCEDURE; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT AND OBSERVER SCAR ASSESSMENT SCALE; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKIN BLOOD VESSEL; SKIN PIGMENTATION; SKIN SCAR; SKIN SURFACE; SKINFOLD THICKNESS;

ADULT; AGED; AMINOQUINOLINES; CARCINOMA, BASAL CELL; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FLUOROURACIL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKIN NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84876148955     PISSN: 09269959     EISSN: 14683083     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04347.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Rhodes LE, de Rie MA, Leifsdottir R, et al. Five-year follow-up of a randomized, prospective trial of topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy vs surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143: 1131-1136.
2. Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, et al. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty 2010; 10: e43.
3. Roques C, Teot L,. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2007; 6: 249-253.
4. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1960-1965. discussion 6-7.
5. van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, et al. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 514-522.
6. Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 487-494.
7. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL,. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428.
8. Streiner DNG,. Health Measurement Scales. Oxford university press, Oxford, UK, 2003.
9. Rosner B,. Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 6th edn. Duxbury, Belmont, 2006.
10. Giraudeau B, Mary JY,. Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Stat Med 2001; 20: 3205-3214.