Robotic surgery: Review of prostate and bladder cancer

Cancer Journal (United States)

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 133-139

  Sohn, William ^a   Lee, Hak J ^a   Ahlering, Thomas E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bladder cancer management; Da Vinci surgical system; Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery; Prostate cancer management; Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

BLADDER CANCER; CANCER SURGERY; CYSTECTOMY; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; PATIENT POSITION SUPPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOTIC SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TROCAR; URINARY DIVERSION;

CYSTECTOMY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84876147109     PISSN: 15289117     EISSN: 1540336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318289dbd5     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol. 1991;146:278-282
2. Ahmed K, Ibrahim A, Wang TT, et al. Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgeryVa systematic review. BJU Int. 2012;110:1544-1556
3. Liberman D, Trinh QD, Jeldres C, et al. Is robotic surgery cost-effective. Yes. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22:61-65
4. Lotan Y. Is robotic surgery cost-effective. No. Curr Opin Urol. 2012; 22:66-69
5. Abdollah F, Budäus L, Sun M, et al. Impact on caseload on total hospital charges: A direct comparison between minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomyVa population based study. J Urol. 2011;185: 855-861
6. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;57:453-458
7. Young HH. VIII. Conservative perineal prostatectomy: The results of two years' experience and report of seventy-five cases. Ann Surg. 1905; 41:549
8. Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1948;59:267
9. Walsh PC. The discovery of the cavernous nerves and development of nerve sparing radical retro- pubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;177:1632
10. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50:854-857
11. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions [in French]. Presse Med. 1998;27:1570-1574
12. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology. 2002;60:864-868
13. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robotassisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:431-452
14. Constantinides CA, Tyritzis SI, Skolarikos A, et al. Short and long-term complications of open radical prostatectomy according to the Clavien classification system. BJU Int. 2008;103:336-340
15. Agarwal PK, Sammon J, Bhandari A, et al. Safety profile of robotassisted radical prostatectomy: A standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol. 2011;59:684-698
16. Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, et al. Surgery related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urol. 2010;75:1092-1099
17. Hruza M, Weiss HO, Pini G, et al. Complications in 2200 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies: Standardized evaluation and analysis of learning curves. Eur Urol. 2010;58:733-741
18. Rabbani F, Yunis LH, Pinochet R, et al. Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:371-386
19. Liss MA, Skarecky D, Morales B, et al. Preventing perioperative complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2013; 81:319-323
20. Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:382-404
21. Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:418-430
22. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robotassisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:405-417
23. Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy: Initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol. 1992;148:1140-1144
24. Haber GP, Campbell SC, Colobo JR, et al. Comparison between open and laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2007;177:548
25. Huang J, Lin T, Lie H, et al. Perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic radical cystectomy: ''pure laparoscopic'' and ''open-assisted laparoscopic'' approaches. Urology. 2007;70:910-915
26. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: Long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:666-675
27. MenonM, Hemak AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cytoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. 2003;92:232-236
28. Davis JW, Castle EP, Pruthi RS, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: An expert panel review of the current status and future direction. Urol Oncol. 2010;28:480-486
29. Pruthi RS, Wallen EM. Is robotic radical cystectomy and appropriate treatment for bladder cancer? Short-term oncologic and clinical followup in 50 consecutive patients. Urology. 2008;72:617-622
30. Murphy DG, Challacombe BJ, Elhage O, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion: Initial experience. Eur Urol. 2008;54:570-580
31. Orvieto MA, DeCastro GJ, Trinh QD, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: Critical review and current status. Urology. 2011;78:977-984
32. Richards KA, Kader K, Pettus JA, et al. Does initial learning curve compromise outcomes for robot-assisted radical cystectomy? A critical evaluation of the first 60 cases while establishing a robotics program. J Endourol. 2011;25:1553-1558
33. Clinical Trials.gov. US National Institute of Health. February 24, 2010. Available at: Http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01076387?term= NCT01076387&rank=1. Accessed December 17, 2012
34. Clinical Trials.gov.USNational Institute ofHealth. June 30, 2010.Available at: Http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01157676?term= NCT01157676 &rank=1. Accessed December 17, 2012
35. Parekh DJ, Fitzgerald J, Ercole B, et al. Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urology. 2012
36. Davis JW, Gaston K, Anderson R, et al. Robot assisted extended pelvic lymphadanectomy at radical cystectomy: Lymph node yield compared with second look open dissection. J Urol. 2011;185:79-83
37. Goh AC, Gill IS, Lee DJ, et al. Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: Replicating open surgical principles. Eur Urol. 2012;62: 891-901
38. Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, et al. Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 2002;167:1295-1298
39. Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina RR, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: Technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2012;61:350-355
40. Nix J, smith A, Jurpad R, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol. 2010;57:196-201
41. Abaza R, Dangle PP, Gong MC, et al. Quality of lymphadenectomy is equivalent with robotic and open cystectomy using an extended template. J Urol. 2012;187:1200-1204
42. Balaji KC, Yohannes P, McBride CL, et al. Feasibility of robot-assisted totally intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal conduit urinary diversion: Initial results of a single institutional pilot study. Urology. 2004;63:51-55
43. Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol. 2003;44:337-339
44. Sala LG, Matsunaga GS, Corica FA, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and totally intracorporeal ileal neobladder. J Endourol. 2006;20:233-236
45. Goh A, Gill I, Lee D, et al. Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: Replicating open surgical principles. Eur Urol. 2012;62: 891-901
46. Mmeje CO, Martin AD, Nunez-Nateras R, et al. Cost analysis of open radical cystectomy versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;14:26-31
47. Smith A, Kurpad R, Lal A, et al. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2010;183:505-509
48. Lee R, Ng CK, Shariat SG, et al. The economics of robotic cystectomy: Cost comparison of open versus robotic. BJU Int. 2011;108:1886-1892