Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: Effects of talker number and noise vocoding

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 2431-2443

  Rosen, Stuart ^a   Souza, Pamela ^b   Ekelund, Caroline ^a,d   Majeed, Arooj A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL BERKSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENERGETIC MASKING; INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS; LONG-TERM SPECTRUM; NATURAL SPEECH; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD; WIDE-BAND;

AUDITION; EXPERIMENTS; SPEECH; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PERIODICITY; RECOGNITION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PERIODICITY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876133857     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.4794379     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agus, T. R., Akeroyd, M. A., Gatehouse, S., and Warden, D. (2009). Informational masking in young and elderly listeners for speech masked by simultaneous speech and noise., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 1926-1940. 10.1121/1.3205403
2. Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., and Kidd, G. (2002). The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2086-2098. 10.1121/1.1510141
3. Arehart, K. H., Souza, P. E., Muralimanohar, R. K., and Miller, C. W. (2011). Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing., J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 54, 190-210. 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0145)
4. Bernstein, J. G. W., and Brungart, D. S. (2011). Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 473-488. 10.1121/1.3589440
5. Bernstein, J. G. W., and Grant, K. W. (2009). Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3358-3372. 10.1121/1.3110132
6. Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations., J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 26, 211-252.
7. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 1-792.
8. Brokx, J. P. L., and Nooteboom, S. G. (1982). Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices., J. Phonetics 10, 23-36.
9. Brungart, D. S. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1101-1109. 10.1121/1.1345696
10. Chan, D., Fourcin, A., Gibbon, D., Granstrom, B., Huckvale, M., Kokkinakis, G., Kvale, K., Lamel, L., Lindberg, B., Moreno, A., Mouropoulos, J., Senia, F., Trancoso, I., Veld, C., and Zeiliger, J. (1995). EUROM-A spoken language resource for the EU., Eurospeech95, in Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Speech Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 867-870.
11. Chen, J., Li, H. H., Li, L., Wu, X. H., and Moore, B. C. J. (2012). Informational masking of speech produced by speech-like sounds without linguistic content., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 2914-2926. 10.1121/1.3688510
12. Cullington, H. E., and Zeng, F. G. (2008). Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 450-461. 10.1121/1.2805617
13. Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., and McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences., J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134, 222-241. 10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222
14. de Cheveigne, A., McAdams, S., Laroche, J., and Rosenberg, M. (1995). Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: A test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3736-3748. 10.1121/1.412389
15. Deroche, M. L. D., and Culling, J. F. (2011). Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: Evidence for harmonic cancellation., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 2855-2865. 10.1121/1.3643812
16. Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., and Wilkinson, L. (2001). Effects of the number of channels and speech-to-noise ratio on rate of connected discourse tracking through a simulated cochlear implant speech processor., Ear Hear. 22, 431-438. 10.1097/00003446-200110000-00007
17. Freyman, R. L., Balakrishnan, U., and Helfer, K. S. (2001). Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2112-2122. 10.1121/1.1354984
18. Freyman, R. L., Balakrishnan, U., and Helfer, K. S. (2004). Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2246-2256. 10.1121/1.1689343
19. Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., and Wang, X. (2001). Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1150-1163. 10.1121/1.1381538
20. Green, T., Faulkner, A., and Rosen, S. (2004). Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2298-2310. 10.1121/1.1785611
21. Greenwood, D. D. (1990). A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2592-2605. 10.1121/1.399052
22. Hawley, M. L., Litovsky, R. Y., and Culling, J. F. (2004). The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 833-843. 10.1121/1.1639908
23. Hoen, M., Meunier, F., Grataloup, C. L., Pellegrino, F., Grimault, N., Perrin, F., Perrot, X., and Collet, L. (2007). Phonetic and lexical interferences in informational masking during speech-in-speech comprehension., Speech Commun. 49, 905-916. 10.1016/j.specom.2007.05.008
24. Howard-Jones, P. A., and Rosen, S. (1993a). The perception of speech in fluctuating noise., Acustica 78, 258-272.
25. Howard-Jones, P. A., and Rosen, S. (1993b). Uncomodulated glimpsing in checkerboard' noise., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2915-2922. 10.1121/1.405811
26. 2, Am. Stat. 39, 279-285.
27. Lorenzi, C., Gilbert, G., Carn, H., Garnier, S., and Moore, B. C. J. (2006). Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 18866-18869. 10.1073/pnas.0607364103
28. MacPherson, A. (2013). The factors affecting the psychometric function for speech intelligibility., Ph.D. thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 1-296.
29. Miller, G. A. (1947). The masking of speech., Psych. Bull. 44, 105-129. 10.1037/h0055960
30. Miller, G. A., and Licklider, J. C. R. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 167-173. 10.1121/1.1906584
31. Moore, B. C. J. (2011). The importance of temporal fine structure for the intelligibility of speech in complex backgrounds., in Speech Perception and Auditory Disorders, edited by, T. Dau, J. Dalsgaard, M. Jepsen, and, T. Poulsen, (Centertryk A/S, Denmark), pp. 21-32.
32. Nelson, P. B., Jin, S. H., Carney, A. E., and Nelson, D. A. (2003). Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 961-968. 10.1121/1.1531983
33. Payton, M. E., Greenstone, M. H., and Schenker, N. (2003). Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance?, J. Insect Sci. 3, 1-6. 10.1672/1536-2442(2003) 003[0001:TMOAAE]2.0.CO;2
34. Peters, R. W., Moore, B. C. J., and Baer, T. (1998). Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 577-587. 10.1121/1.421128
35. Plomp, R., and Mimpen, A. M. (1979). Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences., Audiology 18, 43-52. 10.3109/00206097909072618
36. Qin, M. K., and Oxenham, A. J. (2003). Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 446-454. 10.1121/1.1579009
37. Ritz, C., and Streibig, J. C. (2005). Bioassay analysis using R., J. Stat. Software 12, 1-22.
38. Ritz, C., and Streibig, J. C. (2008). Nonlinear Regression with R (Springer, New York), pp. 1-148.
39. Rosen, S. (1992). Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory, and linguistic aspects., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 336, 367-373. 10.1098/rstb.1992.0070
40. Rosen, S., and Iverson, P. (2007). Constructing adequate non-speech analogues: What is special about speech anyway?, Dev. Sci. 10, 165-168. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00550.x
41. Rothauser, E. H., Chapman, N. D., Guttman, N., Nordby, K. S., Silbiger, H. R., Urbanek, G. E., and Weinstock, M. (1969). IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements., IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 17, 225-246. 10.1109/TAU.1969.1162058
42. Scott, S. K., Rosen, S., Beaman, C. P., Davis, J. P., and Wise, R. J. S. (2009). The neural processing of masked speech: Evidence for different mechanisms in the left and right temporal lobes., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 1737-1743. 10.1121/1.3050255
43. Scott, S. K., Rosen, S., Wickham, L., and Wise, R. J. S. (2004). A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 813-821. 10.1121/1.1639336
44. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., and Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues., Science 270, 303-304. 10.1126/science.270.5234.303
45. Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). Object-based auditory and visual attention., Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 182-186. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.003
46. Simpson, S. A., and Cooke, M. (2005). Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 2775-2778. 10.1121/1.2062650
47. Souza, P., Arehart, K., Miller, C. W., and Muralimanohar, R. K. (2011). Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing., Ear Hear. 32, 75-83. 10.1093/eurheartj/ ehq370
48. Souza, P., and Rosen, S. (2009). Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 792-805. 10.1121/1.3158835
49. Stickney, G. S., Zeng, F. G., Litovsky, R., and Assmann, P. (2004). Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1081-1091. 10.1121/1.1772399
50. Stone, M. A., Fullgrabe, C., and Moore, B. C. J. (2012). Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 317-326. 10.1121/1.4725766
51. Vestergaard, M. D., and Patterson, R. D. (2009). Effects of voicing in the recognition of concurrent syllables., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 2860-2863. 10.1121/1.3257582