Myocardial function in premature infants: A longitudinal observational study

BMJ Open

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Eriksen, Beate Horsberg ^a,b   Nestaas, Eirik ^c   Hole, Torstein ^a,b   Liestoø, Knut ^a,d   Stoøylen, Asbjoørn ^b,e   Fugelseth, Drude ^f,g  

^a Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c VESTFOLD HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^e TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^f OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; DIASTOLE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OXYGEN THERAPY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE WAVE; SYSTOLE; TISSUE DOPPLER IMAGING;

EID: 84876129257     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002441     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Haworth SG. Pulmonaryvascular remodeling in neonatal pulmonary hypertension. State of the art. Chest1988;93:133-8.
2. Fugelseth D, Lindemann R, Liestol K, et al.Ultrasonographic study of ductus venosus in healthy neonates. Arch Dis ChildFetal Neonatal Ed 1997;77:131-4.
3. LeFlore JL, Engle WD. Capillary refill time is anunreliable indicator of cardiovascular status in term neonates. Adv NeonatalCare 2005;5:147-54. (Pubitemid 40733223)
4. Wodey E, Pladys P, Betremieux P, et al. Capillaryrefilling time and hemodynamics in neonates: a Doppler echocardiographicevaluation. Crit Care Med 1998;26:1437-40. (Pubitemid 28384647)
5. de Boode WP. Clinical monitoring of systemic hemodynamicsin critically ill newborns. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:137-41.
6. Groves AM, Kuschel CA,Knight DB, et al. Relationship between blood pressure and blood flow in newbornpreterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:F29-32.
7. Lopez L, Colan SD, Frommelt PC, et al. Recommendationsfor quantification methods during the performance of a pediatricechocardiogram: a report from the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of theAmerican Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart DiseaseCouncil. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:465-95; quiz 576-7.
8. Gulati VK, Katz WE, Follansbee WP, et al. Mitral annulardescent velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography as an index of global leftventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:979-84. (Pubitemid 26158086)
9. Rodriguez L, Garcia M, Ares M, et al. Assessment ofmitral annular dynamics during diastole by Doppler tissue imaging: comparisonwith mitral Doppler inflow in subjects without heart disease and in patientswith left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1996;131:982-7. (Pubitemid 26135764)
10. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, et al. Dopplertissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricularrelaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol1997;30:1527-33. (Pubitemid 27486472)
11. Dalen H, Thorstensen A, Vatten LJ, et al. Referencevalues and distribution of conventional echocardiographic Doppler measures andlongitudinal tissue Doppler velocities in a population free from cardiovasculardisease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:614-22.
12. Mori K, Nakagawa R, Nii M, et al. Pulsed wave Dopplertissue echocardiography assessment of the long axis function of the right andleft ventricles during the early neonatal period. Heart 2004;90:175-80. (Pubitemid 38147153)
13. Negrine RJ, Chikermane A, Wright JG, et al. Assessmentof myocardial function in neonates using tissue Doppler imaging. Arch Dis ChildFetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F304-6.
14. Nestaas E, Stoylen A, Fugelseth D. Optimal types ofprobe, and tissue Doppler frame rates, for use during tissue Doppler recordingand off-line analysis of strain and strain rate in neonates at term. CardiolYoung 2008;18:502-11.
15. Nestaas E, Stoylen A, Sandvik L, et al. Feasibility andreliability of strain and strain rate measurement in neonates by optimizing theanalysis parameters settings. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33:270-8. (Pubitemid 46240603)
16. Nestaas E, Stoylen A, Brunvand L, et al. Tissue Dopplerderived longitudinal strain and strain rate during the first 3 days of life inhealthy term neonates. Pediatr Res 2009;65:357-62.
17. Nestaas E, Stoylen A, Brunvand L, et al. Longitudinalstrain and strain rate by tissue Doppler are more sensitive indices thanfractional shortening for assessing the reduced myocardial function inasphyxiated neonates. Cardiol Young 2011;21:1-7.
18. Eidem BW, McMahon CJ, Cohen RR, et al. Impact of cardiacgrowth on Doppler tissue imaging velocities: a study in healthy children. J AmSoc Echocardiogr 2004;17:212-21. (Pubitemid 38879250)
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessingagreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
20. Joshi S, Edwards JM, Wilson DG, et al. Reproducibilityof myocardial velocity and deformation imaging in term and preterm infants. EurJ Echocardiogr 2010;11:44-50.
21. Roberson DA, Cui W, Chen Z, et al. Annular and septalDoppler tissue imaging in children: normal z-score tables and effects of age,heart rate, and body surface area. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:1276-84. (Pubitemid 350026723)
22. Sonnenblick EH. Force-velocity relations in mammalianheart muscle. Am J Physiol 1962;202:931-9.
23. Borlaug BA, Melenovsky V, Redfield MM, et al. Impact ofarterial load and loading sequence on left ventricular tissue velocities inhumans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1570-7. (Pubitemid 47532334)
24. Weidemann F, Jamal F, Sutherland GR, et al. Myocardialfunction defined by strain rate and strain during alterations in inotropicstates and heart rate. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002;283:H792-9. (Pubitemid 34790876)