Predictors of immediate continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 442-446

  Sammon, Jesse D ^a   Sharma, Pranav ^a   Trinh, Quoc Dien ^a,b   Ghani, Khurshid R ^a   Sukumar, Shyam ^a   Menon, Mani ^a  

^a HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CATHETER REMOVAL; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CONTINENCE; FOLLOW UP; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL PROSTATE SYMPTOM SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE WEIGHT; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; URINARY TRACT FUNCTION;

DEMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84876112675     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0312     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sammon J, Trinh Q, Ghani K, et al. Predicting an individual's risk of urinary incontinence one year following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl 2012;11: E1055-e1055a.
2. Albertsen PC, Nease RF, Jr., Potosky AL. Assessment of patient preferences among men with prostate cancer. J Urol 1998;159:158-163
3. Ko YH, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, et al. Factors affecting return of continence 3 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis from a large, prospective data by a single surgeon. J Urol 2012;187:190-194
4. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody, J. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Technique. J Urol 2003;169:2289-2292
5. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51:648-657; discussion 657-648
6. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Technical modifications in 2009. Eur Urol 2009;56:89-96
7. Sammon J, Kim TK, Trinh QD, et al. Anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Randomized controlled trial comparing barbed and standard monofilament suture. Urology 2011;78:572-579
8. Sammon JD, Trinh QD, Sukumar S, et al. Long-term followup of patients undergoing percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP BJU Int 2012;110:580-585
9. Krane LS, Wambi C, Bhandari A, et al. Posterior support for urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy: Single surgeon analysis. Can J Urol 2009;16:4836-4840
10. Krane LS, Bhandari M, Peabody JO, et al. Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2009;56:325-330
11. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:373-383
12. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: Results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012;61:679-685
13. Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, et al. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy - Does it have an impact on urinary continence? J Urol 2006;176:189
14. Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, et al. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010;184:1028-1033
15. Koch MO, Nayee AH, Sloan J, et al. Early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy: Long-term followup. J Urol 2003;169:2170-2172