Intrinsic time dependence in the diversity-invasibility relationship

Ecology

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 25-31

  Clark, Graeme F ^a   Johnston, Emma L ^a   Leung, Brian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biotic resistance; Dispersal; Disturbance; Invasion paradox; Resource availability; Temporal

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CORRELATION; FECUNDITY; INVASIBILITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; SIMULATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SURVEYING; TIME DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; TIME;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84876103533     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/12-0592.1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brown, R. L., and R. K. Peet. 2003. Diversity and invasibility of southern Appalachian plant communities. Ecology 84:32-39.
2. Clark, G. F., and E. L. Johnston. 2011. Temporal change in the diversity-invasibility relationship in the presence of a disturbance regime. Ecology Letters 14:52-57.
3. Davies, K. F., P. Chesson, S. Harrison, B. D. Inouye, B. A. Melbourne, and K. J. Rice. 2005. Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship. Ecology 86:1602-1610.
4. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528-534.
5. Dietz, H., and P. J. Edwards. 2006. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87:1359-1367.
6. Fridley, J. D., J. J. Stachowicz, S. Naeem, D. F. Sax, E. W. Seabloom, M. D. Smith, T. J. Stohlgren, D. Tilman, and B. Von Holle. 2007. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88:3-17.
7. Gilbert, B., and M. J. Lechowicz. 2005. Invasibility and abiotic gradients: the positive correlation between native and exotic plant diversity. Ecology 86:1848-1855.
8. Hobbs, R. J., and L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324-337.
9. Huston, M. A. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 108:449-460.
10. Keeley, J. E., D. Lubin, and C. J. Fotheringham. 2003. Fire and grazing impacts on plant diversity and alien plant invasions in the southern Sierra Nevada. Ecological Applications 13:1355-1374.
11. Kennedy, T. A., S. Naeem, and K. Howe, and e. al. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417:636-638.
12. Knight, K. S., and P. B. Reich. 2005. Opposite relationships between invasibility and native species richness at patch versus landscape scales. Oikos 109:81-88.
13. Levine, J. M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:852-854.
14. Levine, J. M., and C. M. D'Antonio. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15-26.
15. Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522-1536.
16. McKay, M. D., R. J. Beckman, and W. J. A. Conover. 1979. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer model. Technometrics 21:239-245.
17. Meiners, S. J., S. T. A. Pickett, and M. L. Cadenasso. 2002. Exotic plant invasions over 40 years of field successions: community patterns and associations. Ecography 25:215-223.
18. Naeem, S., J. M. H. Knops, D. Tilman, K. M. Howe, T. Kennedy, and S. Gale. 2000. Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91:97-108.
19. Peck, S. L. 2004. Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:530-534.
20. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
21. Sax, D. F. 2002. Native and naturalized plant diversity are positively correlated in scrub communities of California and Chile. Diversity and Distributions 8:193-210.
22. Seabloom, E. W., W. S. Harpole, O. J. Reichman, and D. Tilman. 2003. Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:13384-13389.
23. Shea, K., and P. Chesson. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:170-176.
24. Stachowicz, J. J., R. B. Whitlach, and R. W. Osman. 1999. Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286:1577-1580.
25. Stohlgren, T. J., D. Binkley, G. W. Chong, M. A. Kalkhan, L. D. Schell, K. A. Bull, Y. Otsuki, G. Newman, M. Bashkin, and Y. Son. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 69:25-46.
26. Theoharides, K. A., and J. S. Dukes. 2007. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species succesduring four stages of invasion. New Phytologist 176:256-273.
27. Thompson, K., J. G. Hodgson, J. P. Grime, and M. J. W. Burke. 2001. Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5-year invasion experiment using native species. Journal of Ecology 89:1054-1060.
28. Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York, New York, USA.