Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan

Scientometrics

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 529-540

  Bajwa, R S ^a   Yaldram, K ^a  

^a PRESTON UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Bibliometric; Biotechnology; Pakistan; Scientometric

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876096552     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0839-x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aldridge, S. (2009). Pakistan's first biotech plant. Nature Biotechnology, 27(9), 788-788.
2. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., et al. (2010). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h-and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82(2), 391-400.
3. Archambault, É., Campbell, D., et al. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320-1326.
4. Bajwa, R. S., & Yaldram, K. (2012). Research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan scenario. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(2), 1-6.
5. Braun, T., Schubert, A., et al. (1997). Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38(2), 321-325.
6. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
7. GainReport (2010). http://gain. fas. usda. gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Biotechnology%20-%20GE%20Plants%20and%20Animals_Islamabad_Pakistan_8-2-2010. pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
8. Gupta, V. K. (2009). Indian publications output in nanotechnology during 1990-2008. Advanced Science Letters, 2(3), 402-404.
9. Haq (2012). http://www. riazhaq. com/2012/03/genomics-biotech-advances-in-pakistan. html. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
10. HEC (2010). http://www. hec. gov. pk/MediaPublication/PressReleases/Pages/HEC%20Scholarships%20%20%20%20The%20best%20Investment%20in%20Pakistan%E2%80%99s%20Future%20%2821-03-2011%29. aspx. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
11. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569.
12. López-Illescas, C., de Moya Anegón, F., et al. (2009). Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: the effect of poorly cited journals in oncology. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 244-256.
13. Mahapatra, M. (1985). On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of scientific literature. In 15th IASLIC conference proceedings (pp 61-70). Bangalore: lIASLIC.
14. Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 161-169.
15. OECD (2001). http://stats. oecd. org/glossary/detail. asp?ID=219. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
16. Pakimag (2012). http://www. pakimag. com/misc/hec-ranking-2012-of-pakistani-universities. html. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
17. Pakistan (2007). http://www. pakissan. com/biotech/institutes. biotech. engineering. shtml. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
18. PCST (2011). Productive Scientist of Pakistan. Available on PCST website http://www. pcst. org. pk. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
19. Prathap, G. (2010). The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics, 84(1), 167-172.
20. Rules, P. B. (2005). Pakistan biosafety rules Government of Pakistan Notification No. S. R. O (1)/2005 issued on 21 April 2005. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
21. SciDev (2011). http://www. scidev. net/en/news/china-aids-first-pakistani-genome-map-1. html. Accessed 25 Aug 2012.
22. ScienceWatch (2012). http://sciencewatch. com/dr/rs/12jan-rs/. Accessed 25 May 2012.
23. Zhu, Q., & Willett, P. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of Chinese superconductivity research, 1986-2007. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.