An aggregate approach to model evacuee behavior for no-notice evacuation operations

Transportation

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 671-696

  Hsu, Yu Ting ^a   Peeta, Srinivas ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evacuation demand; Evacuee behavior modeling; Fuzzy logic; Mixed logit model; No notice evacuation operations

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; FUZZY LOGIC; LOGISTIC REGRESSION;

AGGREGATE BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR MODEL; BEHAVIORAL PROCESS; EVACUATION DEMAND; EVACUATION ROUTES; INFORMATION-BASED CONTROL; MIXED LOGIT MODELS; PREDICTION ACCURACY;

EMERGENCY TRAFFIC CONTROL;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MODELING; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84876085873     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-012-9440-7     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abdelgawad, H., Abdulhai, B.: Managing large-scale multimodal emergency evacuations. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 2(2), 122-151 (2010).
2. Alsnih, R., Stopher, P. R.: Review of procedures associated with devising emergency evacuation plans. Transp. Res. Rec. 1865, 79-89 (2004).
3. Baker, E. J.: Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters 9(2), 287-310 (1991).
4. Chiu, Y., Mirchandani, P. B.: Online behavior-robust feedback information routing strategy for mass evacuation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 9(2), 264-274 (2008).
5. Chiu, Y., Zheng, H., Villalobos, J., Gautam, B.: Modeling no-notice mass evacuation using a dynamic traffic flow optimization model. IIE Trans. 39, 83-94 (2007).
6. Eder, A.: After September 11, 2001: how transit agencies prepare for the threat of terrorism. Transp. Res. Rec. 1927, 92-100 (2005).
7. Fu, H., Wilmot, C. G.: Sequential logit dynamic travel demand model for hurricane evacuation. Transp. Res. Rec. 1882, 19-26 (2004).
8. Fu, H., Wilmot, C. G.: Survival analysis-based dynamic travel demand models for hurricane evacuation. Transp. Res. Rec. 1964, 211-218 (2006).
9. Hobeika, A. G., Kim, C.: Comparison of traffic assignments in evacuation modeling. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 45(2), 192-198 (1998).
10. Kalafatas, G., Peeta, S.: Planning for evacuation: insights from an efficient network design model. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 15(1), 21-30 (2009).
11. Kang, J. E., Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S.: Hurricane evacuation expectations and actual behavior in hurricane Lili. J. Appl. Psychol. 37(4), 887-903 (2007).
12. Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S.: Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: examples from hurricane research and planning. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 133(1), 18-29 (2007).
13. Lotan, T., Koutsopoulos, H.: Models for route choice behavior in the presence of information using concepts from fuzzy set theory and approximate reasoning. Transportation 20(2), 129-155 (1993).
14. Mawson, A. R.: Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster. Psychiatry 68(2), 95-113 (2005).
15. Mileti, D. S., Peek, L.: The social psychology of public response to warnings of a nuclear power plant accident. J. Hazard. Mater. 75(2-3), 181-194 (2000).
16. Murray-Tuite, P.: Perspectives for network management in response to unplanned disruptions. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 133(1), 9-17 (2007).
17. Nozawa, M., Watanabe, T., Katada, N., Minami, H., Yamamoto, A.: Residents' awareness and behaviour regarding typhoon evacuation advice in Hyogo Prefecture. Jpn. Int. Nurs. Rev. 55, 20-26 (2008).
18. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL): Oak Ridge Evacuation Modeling System (OREMS) 2. 5 User Guide. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN (1998).
19. Pang, G. K. H., Takahashi, K., Yokota, T., Takenaga, H.: Adaptive route selection for dynamic route guidance system based on fuzzy-neural approaches. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 48(6), 2028-2041 (1999).
20. Paz, A., Peeta, S.: Information-based network control strategies consistent with estimated driver behavior. Transp. Res. B 43(1), 73-96 (2009).
21. Peeta, S., Yu, J. W.: Data-consistent fuzzy approach for online driver behavior under information provision. Transp. Res. Rec. 1803, 76-86 (2002).
22. Peeta, S., Yu, J. W.: Adaptability of a hybrid route choice model to incorporating driver behavior dynamics under information provision. IEEE Trans. on Syst. 34(2), 243-256 (2004).
23. Peeta, S., Ziliaskopoulos, A. K.: Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: the past, the present and the future. Netw. Spat. Econ. 1(3-4), 233-256 (2001).
24. Prashker, J., Bekhor, S.: Route choice models used in the stochastic user equilibrium problem: a review. Transp. Rev. 24(4), 437-463 (2004).
25. Robinson, R. M., Khattak, A.: Route change decision making by hurricane evacuees facing congestion. Transp. Res. Rec. 2196, 168-175 (2010).
26. Sbayti, H., Mahmassani, H. S.: Optimal scheduling of evacuation operations. Transp. Res. Rec. 1964, 238-246 (2006).
27. Sheffi, Y., Mahmassani, H. S., Powell, W. B.: A transportation network evacuation model. Transp. Res. A 16(3), 209-218 (1982).
28. Sherali, H. D., Carter, T. B., Hobeika, A. G.: A location-allocation model and algorithm for evacuation planning under hurricane/flood conditions. Transp. Res. B 25(6), 439-452 (1991).
29. Song, W., Xu, X., Wang, B., Ni, S.: Simulation of evacuation processes using a multi-grid model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. A 363, 492-500 (2006).
30. Stern, E.: Evacuation intentions of parents in an urban radiological emergency. Urban Stud 26(2), 191-198 (1989).
31. Teodorović, D., Vukanović, S., Obradović, K.: Modeling route choice with advanced traveler information by fuzzy logic. Transp. Plan. Technol. 22(1), 1-25 (1998).
32. Tierney, K. J., Lindell, M. K., Perry, R. W.: Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC (2001).
33. Train, K.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (2003).
34. Turner, D. S., Evans, W. A., Kumlachew, M., Wolshon, B., Dixit, V., Sisiopiku, V. P., Islam, S., Anderson, M. D.: Issues, practices, and needs for communicating evacuation information to vulnerable populations. Transp. Res. Rec. 2196, 159-167 (2010).
35. Tuydes, H., Ziliaskopoulos, A.: Tabu-based heuristic approach for optimization of network evacuation contraflow. Transp. Res. Rec. 1964, 157-168 (2006).
36. Wilmot, C. G., Mei, B.: Comparison of alternative trip generation models for hurricane evacuation. Nat. Hazards Rev. 5(4), 170-178 (2004).
37. Wolshon, B.: Planning for the evacuation of New Orleans. ITE J. 72(2), 44-49 (2002).
38. Xie, C., Lin, D., Waller, S. T.: A dynamic evacuation network optimization problem with lane reversal and crossing elimination strategies. Transp. Res. E 46(3), 295-316 (2010).
39. Ziliaskopoulos, A. K.: A linear programming model for the single destination system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transp. Sci. 34(1), 37-49 (2000).