Stronger instruments via integer programming in an observational study of late preterm birth outcomes

Annals of Applied Statistics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 25-50

  Zubizarreta, José R ^a   Small, Dylan S ^a   Goyal, Neera K ^a   Lorch, Scott ^a   Rosenbaum, Paul R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attributable effect; Equivalence test; Fine balance; Instrumental variable; Integer programming; Nonbipartite matching; Observational study; Optimal subset matching; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876060057     PISSN: 19326157     EISSN: 19417330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1214/12-AOAS582     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74 235-267.
2. Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W. (2008). On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 76 1537-1557.
3. Almond, D. and Doyle, J. J. (2008). After midnight: A regression discontinuity design in length of postpartum hospital stays. NBER Working Paper 13877. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w13877
4. Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables (with discussion). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 444-455.
5. Baiocchi, M., Small, D. S., Lorch, S. and Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010). Building a stronger instrument in an observational study of perinatal care for premature infants. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105 1285-1296.
6. Bauer, P. and Kieser, M. (1996). A unifying approach for confidence intervals and testing of equivalence and difference. Biometrika 83 934-937.
7. Bertsekas, D. P. (1981). A new algorithm for the assignment problem. Math. Program. 21 152-171.
8. Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A. and Baker, R. M. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90 443-450.
9. Cornfield, J., Haenszel, W., Hammond, E. C., Lilienfeld, A. M., Shimkin, M. B. and Wynder, E. L. (1959). Smoking and lung cancer: Recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 22 173-203.
10. Corrada Bravo, H. (2005). Package Rcplex. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rcplex/Rcplex.pdf
11. Derigs, U. (1988). Solving nonbipartite matching problems via shortest path techniques. Ann. Oper. Res. 13 225-261.
12. Diprete, T. A. and Gangl, M. (2004). Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects. Sociol. Method. 34 271-310.
13. Edmonds, J. (1965). Maximum matching and a polyhedron with 0,1-vertices. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards Sect. B 69B 125-130.
14. Egleston, B. L., Scharfstein, D. O. and MacKenzie, E. (2009). On estimation of the survivor average causal effect in observational studies when important confounders are missing due to death. Biometrics 65 497-504.
15. Fisher, R. A. (1935). Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
16. Gadbury, G. L. (2001). Randomization inference and bias of standard errors. Amer. Statist. 55 310-313.
17. Gastwirth, J. L. (1992). Methods for assessing the sensitivity of statistical comparisons used in Title VII cases to omitted variables. Jurimetrics 33 19-34.
18. Gastwirth, J. L., Krieger, A. M. and Rosenbaum, P. R. (1998). Dual and simultaneous sensitivity analysis for matched pairs. Biometrika 85 907-920.
19. Goyal, N. K., Fager, C. and Lorch, S. A. (2011). Adherence to discharge guidelines for late-preterm newborns. Pediatrics 128 62-71.
20. Hansen, B. B. (2007). Optmatch. R News 7 18-24. R package optmatch.
21. Holland, P. W. H. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. Sociol. Method. 18 449-484.
22. Hosman, C. A., Hansen, B. B. and Holland, P. W. (2010). The sensitivity of linear regression coefficients' confidence limits to the omission of a confounder. Ann. Appl. Stat. 4 849-870.
23. Imbens, G. W. (2003). Sensitivity to exogeneity assumptions in program evaluation. Am. Econ. Rev. 93 126-132.
24. Korte, B. and Vygen, J. (2008). Combinatorial Optimization: Theory and Algorithms, 4th ed. Algorithms and Combinatorics 21. Springer, Berlin.
25. Langenskiold, S. and Rubin, D. B. (2008). Outcome-free design of observational studies. Annals of Economics and Statistics 91/92 107-125.
26. Lu, B. (2005). Propensity score matching with time-dependent covariates. Biometrics 61 721-728.
27. Lu, B., Greevy, R., Xu, X. and Beck, C. (2011). Optimal nonbipartite matching and its statistical applications. Amer. Statist. 65 21-30.
28. Malkin, J. D., Broder, M. S. and Keeler, E. (2000). Do longer postpartum stays reduce newborn readmissions? Analysis using instrumental variables. Health Serv. Res. 35 1071-1091.
29. Marcus, S. M. (1997). Using omitted variable bias to assess uncertainty in the estimation of an AIDS education treatment effect. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 22 193-201.
30. McCandless, L. C., Gustafson, P. and Levy, A. (2007). Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies. Stat. Med. 26 2331-2347.
31. Neyman, J. (1923). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Ann. Agric. Sci. 10 1-51 (in Polish). [Reprinted in English with discussion by T. Speed and D. B. Rubin in Statist. Sci. 5 (1990) 463-480. MR1092986]
32. Politis, D. N. and Romano, J. P. (1994). Large sample confidence regions based on subsamples under minimal assumptions. Ann. Statist. 22 2031-2050.
33. Reiter, J. (2000). Using statistics to determine causal relationships. Amer. Math. Monthly 107 24-32.
34. Rosenbaum, P. R. (1989). Optimal matching in observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84 1024-1032.
35. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002a). Observational Studies, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
36. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002b). Attributing effects to treatment in matched observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97 183-192.
37. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010). Design of Observational Studies. Springer, New York.
38. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2012). Optimal matching of an optimally chosen subset in observational studies. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 21 57-71.
39. Rosenbaum, P. R., Ross, R. N. and Silber, J. H. (2007). Minimum distance matched sampling with fine balance in an observational study of treatment for ovarian cancer. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102 75-83.
40. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1983). Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 45 212-218.
41. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Silber, J. H. (2009a). Sensitivity analysis for equivalence and difference in an observational study of neonatal intensive care units. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 104 501-511.
42. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Silber, J. H. (2009b). Amplification of sensitivity analysis in matched observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 104 1398-1405.
43. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educ. Psych. 66 688-701.
44. Rubin, D. B. (1980). Bias reduction using Mahalanobis metric matching. Biometrics 36 293-298.
45. Schrijver, A. (1986). Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. Wiley, Chichester.
46. Silber, J. H., Lorch, S. L., Rosenbaum, P. R., Medoff-Cooper, B., Bakewell-Sachs, S., Millman, A., Mi, L., Even-Shoshan, O. and Escobar, G. E. (2009). Additional maturity at discharge and subsequent health care costs. Health Serv. Res. 44 444-463.
47. Small, D. S. and Rosenbaum, P. R. (2008). War and wages: The strength of instrumental variables and their sensitivity to unobserved biases. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103 924-933.
48. Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statist. Sci. 25 1-21.
49. Wang, L. and Krieger, A. M. (2006). Causal conclusions are most sensitive to unobserved binary covariates. Stat. Med. 25 2257-2271.
50. Welch, B. L. (1937). On the z-test in randomized blocks and Latin squares. Biometrika 29 21-52.
51. Wolsey, L. A. (1998). Integer Programming. Wiley, New York.
52. Yanagawa, T. (1984). Case-control studies: Assessing the effect of a confounding factor. Biometrika 71 191-194.
53. Yang, D., Small, D. S., Silber, J. H. and Rosenbaum, P. R. (2012). Optimal matching with minimal deviation from fine balance in a study of obesity and surgical outcomes. Biometrics 68 628-636.
54. Yu, B. B. and Gastwirth, J. L. (2005). Sensitivity analysis for trend tests: Application to the risk of radiation exposure. Biostatistics 6 201-209.
55. Zubizarreta, J. R., Reinke, C. E., Kelz, R. R., Silber, J. H. and Rosenbaum, P. R. (2011). Matching for several sparse nominal variables in a case-control study of readmission following surgery. Amer. Statist. 65 229-238