Routes and requirements for realizing pervasive medical devices

Pervasive Computing in Healthcare

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 217-241

  Craven, Michael P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876049060     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Booth, A. The ScHARR Guide to Evidence-based Practice. ScHARR (School of Health and Related Research) Occasional Paper No. 97/2, University of Sheffield, 1997. See also http://www.nettingtheevidence.org.uk/(accessed 21 March 2005).
2. Baxter, M. Product Design: A Practical Guide to Systematic Methods of New Product Development. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995.
3. Bromley, A., Bensenane, J., Riley, K., Sullivan, K., Mazzei, L., Guglieri, A., Arrizabalaga-Moreno, F., Alfonsel, M., and Rozynski, E. Gaining Reimbursement for Medical Devices and Diagnostics. Clinical Report CBS924, Strategic Management Reports Series, PJB Publications Ltd., March 2004.
4. Papatheofanis, F.J. Estimating cost in health economic analyses. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 22(5), 14-15, 2003.
5. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) Web site. University of York, U.K., http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/(accessed 15 March 2005).
6. NHS HTA Programme Web site. National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment (NCCHTA), U.K., http://www.ncchta.org/(accessed 10 March 2005).
7. Taylor, R. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). HTA rhyme and reason? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18(2), 166-70, 2002.
8. Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) Web site. http://www.ghtf.org/(accessed 14 March 2005).
9. Device Advice Web site. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S., http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/devadvice/(accessed 15 March 2005).
10. Europa Enterprise-Medical Devices Web site. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/medical_devices/(accessed 12 March 2005).
11. Higson, G.R. Medical Device Safety: The Regulation of Medical Devices for Public Health and Safety. Bristol: IOP Publishing, 2002.
12. MEDDEV. Guidelines Relating to Medical Devices Directives. Europa Enterprise-Medical Devices, http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/medical_devices/meddev/(accessed 12 March 2005).
13. Davey, S., Anderson, J., and Meenan, B. An Overview of Current Classification Systems for Healthcare Devices and Their Limitations. Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH), May 2005. Available from http://www.match.ac.uk/.
14. World Health Organization (WHO). Medical Device Regulations: Global Overview and Guiding Principles. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
15. International Standards Organisation (ISO) Web site. http://www.iso.org/(accessed 15 March 2005).
16. Fries, R.C. Reliable Design of Medical Devices. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997.
17. Cohen, T. Medical and information technologies converge: the impact on clinical engineering. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 23(3), 59-65, 2004.
18. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Web site. http://www.ihe.net/(accessed 23 March 2005).
19. Reid, P.P., Compton, W.D., Grosman, J.H., and Fanjiang G. (Eds.). Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership, National Academic of Engineering and Institute of Medicine, The National Academies Press, http://www.nap.edu/books/030909643X/html (accessed 10 December 2005).
20. Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Web site. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/(accessed 23 March 2005).
21. Grimes, S.L. Security: a new clinical engineering paradigm. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 23(4), 80-82, 2004.
22. Boutrand, J.P. When to conduct a clinical trial: medical device technology (MDT). Octomedia Ltd., October 2004: 28-31. Available from http://www.medicaldevicesonline.com/.
23. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) Web site. National Patient Safety Agency, National Health Service, U.K., http://www.corec.org.uk/(accessed 29 March 2005).
24. Local Research Ethics Committees, HSG(91)5, 1991. Department of Health, Heywood, Lancs., U.K. http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsLibrary/fs/en/(accessed 21 March 2005).
25. Code of Federal Regulations, Protection of Human Subjects, 45 CFR Part 46, 2001. Office of Human Research Protections, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Web site, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm (accessed 14 March 2005).
26. Animal Ethics Web page. National Health and Medical Research Council, Ethical Issues, Australia, http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/issues/animal ethics.htm (accessed 14 March 2005).
27. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3R) Web site, U.K. http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/(accessed 14 March 2005).
28. Online Ethics Center (OEC), Reference Materials on Research Ethics, http://onlineethics.org/reseth/reference.html (accessed 14 March 2005).
29. Clinical Ethics Network (CEN) Web site. http://www.ethics-network.org.uk/(accessed 21 March 2005).
30. Code of Ethics for Interactions with Health Care Professionals, Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed). http://www.advamed.org/publicdocs/coe.html (accessed 14 March 2005).
31. Lilford, R., Braunholtz, D., Harris, J., and Gill, T. Trials in surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 91, 6-16, 2004.
32. Lilford, R.J., Braunholtz, D.A., Greenhalgh, R., and Edwards, S.J.L. Trials and fast changing technologies: the case for tracker studies. British Medical Journal, 320, 43-46, 2000.
33. Cooper, R.G. Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-54, 1990.
34. Rochford, L. and Rudelius, W. Stages and success in the medical products industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 26, 67-84, 1997.
35. Dixon, D., Eatock, J., Meenan, B., Young, T., and Anderson, J. MATCH Guide on Product Development Processes in the Medical Device Industry. Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH), May 2005. Available from http://www.match.ac.uk/.
36. Eatock, J., Dixon, D., Meenan, B., Young, T., and Anderson, J. Report on Medical Device Product Development Processes: Some Illustrative Examples. Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH), April 2005. Available from http://www.match.ac.uk/.
37. Healthcare Web page. Cambridge Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, http://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/healthcare/(accessed 22 March 2005).
38. Health Economics Research Group (HERG) Web site. Brunel University, U.K., http://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/acad/herg/(accessed 22 March 2005).
39. Johnston, K., Buxton, M.J., Jones, D.R., and Fitzpatrick, R. Assessing the costs of healthcare technologies in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment, 3(6), 1-76, 1999.
40. Wong, C. On the horizon: new rules for medical devices: preparing for new environmental regulations and product compliance. Agile SME Solutions, News, August 23, 2004, http://sme.agile.com/news/2004/biosci-082304.pdf (accessed 22 March 2005).
41. Craven, M.P. and Martin, J.L. How does the healthcare industry involve users in medical device development?-Pointers for UbiHealth. Paper presented at UbiHealth 2004: The 3rd International Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing for Pervasive Healthcare Applications, at UbiComp 2004, the Sixth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Nottingham, England, 7-10 September 2004. http://www.pervasivehealthcare.com/ubicomp2004/papers/(accessed 22 March 2005).
42. Medical Devicelink. http://www.devicelink.com/(accessed 31 March 2005).
43. Medical Device Technology (MDT). http://www.medicaldevicesonline.com/(accessed 15 March 2005).
44. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. http://www.ieee.org/organizations/pubs/magazines/emb.htm (accessed 31 March 2005).