Negation Generates Nonliteral Interpretations by Default

Metaphor and Symbol

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 89-115

  Giora, Rachel ^a   Livnat, Elad ^a   Fein, Ofer ^b   Barnea, Anat ^a   Zeiman, Rakefet ^a   Berger, Iddo ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b ACADEMIC COLLEGE OF TEL AVIV YAFFO   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876034047     PISSN: 10926488     EISSN: 15327868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2013.768510     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Abbas, A. (2012, July 9). Imran Khan-reality over myth. The News International. http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-2-119369-Imran-Khan-%E2%80%94-reality-over-myth (http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-2-119369-Imran-Khan-%E2%80%94-reality-over-myth)
2. Ariel, M. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Barbe, K. 1993. "Isn't it ironic that...?": Explicit irony markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 20: 578-590.
4. Beardsley, C. M. 1958. Aesthetics, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.
5. Birner, B. J. and Ward, G. 1998. Information status and noncanonical word order in English, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
6. Bryant, G. A. and Fox Tree, J. E. 2002. Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol, 17: 99-117.
7. Campbell, J. D. and Katz, A. N. 2012. Are there necessary conditions for inducing a sense of sarcastic irony?. Discourse Processes, 49: 459-480.
8. Carr, P. (2010, January 13). Soul searching: Google's position on China might be many things, but moral it is not. http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/13/not-safe-for-wok (http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/13/not-safe-for-wok)
9. Carston, R. 1996. Metalinguistic negation and echoic use. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3): 309-330.
10. Carston, R. 1997. Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed?. Linguistische Berichte, 8: 103-127.
11. Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12. Carston, R. 2012. "Metaphor and the literal-nonliteral distinction". In Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, Edited by: Allan, K. and Jaszczolt, K. 469-492. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Carston, R. and Wearing, C. 2011. Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition, 3(2): 283-312.
14. Chapman, S. 1993. Metalinguistic negation, sentences and utterances. Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics, 1: 74-94.
15. Chapman, S. 1996. Some observations on metalinguistic negation. Journal of linguistics, 32: 387-402.
16. Clark, H. H. 1970. "Word associations and linguistic theory". In New horizons in linguistic theory, Edited by: Lyons, J. 271-286. London, UK: Penguin.
17. Croft, W. 2007. "Construction grammar". In The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, Edited by: Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H. 463-508. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Du Bois, W. J. 2007. "The stance triangle". In Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, Edited by: Englebretson, R. 139-182. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
19. Du Bois, W. J. 2012. Dialogic syntax. Manuscript submitted for publication
20. Erman, B. and Warren, B. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1): 29-62.
21. Ferguson, H. J., Sanford, A. J. and Leuthold, H. 2008. Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds. Brain Research, 1236: 113-125.
22. Fillenbaum, S. 1966. Memory for gist: Some relevant variables. Language and Speech, 9: 217-227.
23. Fraenkel, T. and Schul, Y. 2008. The meaning of negated adjectives. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(4): 517-540.
24. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 1980. Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition, 8: 449-456.
25. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 1981. Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20: 431-444.
26. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 1986a. Comprehension and memory for nonliteral utterances: The problem of sarcastic indirect requests. Acta Psychologica, 62: 41-57.
27. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 1986b. On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115: 3-15.
28. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding, New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34: 457-486.
30. Giora, R. 1995. On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19: 239-264.
31. Giora, R. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7: 183-206.
32. Giora, R. 1999. On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31: 919-929.
33. Giora, R. 2003. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. Giora, R. 2006. Anything negatives can do affirmatives can do just as well, except for some metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 981-1014. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.12.006
35. Giora, R. 2007. "A good Arab is not a dead Arab-a racist incitement": On the accessibility of negated concepts". In Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive, and intercultural aspects, Edited by: Kecskés, I. and Horn, L. R. 129-162. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. Giora, R., Balaban, N., Fein, O. and Alkabets, I. 2005. "Negation as positivity in disguise". In Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences, Edited by: Colston, H. L. and Katz, A. 233-258. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Giora, R., Drucker, A., Fein, O. and Mendelson, I. 2012. Negation generates sarcastic interpretations by default: Nonsalient vs. salience-based interpretations, Manuscript submitted for publication.
38. Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K. and Alkabets-Zlozover, I. 2007. Negation in context: A functional approach to suppression. Discourse Processes, 43: 153-172.
39. Giora, R., Fein, O., Ganzi, J., Alkeslassy Levi, N. and Sabah, H. 2005. Negation as mitigation: The case of negative irony. Discourse Processes, 39: 81-100.
40. Giora, R., Fein, O., Laadan, D., Wolfson, J., Zeituny, M., Kidron, R., and Shaham, R. 2007. Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2): 119-146.
41. Giora, R., Fein, O., Metuki, N. and Stern, P. 2010. "Negation as a metaphor-inducing operator". In The Expression of Cognitive Categories: Vol. 4. The expression of negation, Edited by: Klein, W. and Levinson, S. 225-256. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. Series Eds
42. Giora, R. and Gur, I. 2003. "Irony in conversation: Salience and context effects". In Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meanings in language and mind, Edited by: Nerlich, B., Todd, Z., Herman, V. and Clarke, D. 297-316. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
43. Giora, R., Raphaely, M., Fein, O. and Livnat, E. 2012. Resonating with contextually inappropriate interpretations: The case of irony, Manuscript submitted for publication.
44. Giora, R., Zimmerman, D. and Fein, O. 2008. How can you compare! On negated comparisons as comparisons. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(4): 501-516.
45. Givoni, S., Giora, R. and Bergerbest, D. 2013. How speakers alert addressees to multiple meanings. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1): 29-40.
46. Glucksberg, S. and Haught, C. 2006. On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind and Language, 21(3): 360-378.
47. Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B. 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97: 3-18.
48. Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49. Goldenberg, D. 2011. Default ironic interpretation, Unpublished manuscript, Tel Aviv University.
50. Goldenberg, S. (2008, November 3). Joke on Palin again as she falls for fake Sarkozy call. The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/03/sarah-palin-phone-prank-sarkozy (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/03/sarah-palin-phone-prank-sarkozy)
51. Grice, H. P. 1975. "Logic and conversation". In Speech acts. Syntax and semantics, Edited by: Cole, P. and Morgan, J. Vol. 3, 41-58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
52. Hasson, U., Avidan, G., Gelbard, H., Vallines, I., Harel, M., Minshew, N. and Behrmann, M. 2009. Shared and idiosyncratic cortical activation patterns in autism revealed under continuous real-life viewing conditions. Autism Research, 2: 220-231.
53. Hasson, U. and Glucksberg, S. 2006. Does understanding negation entail affirmation? An examination of negated metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 1015-1032.
54. Hawk. (2012, January 22). Is Obama a president or a puppet? [Web log comment]. http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/is-obama-a-president-or-a-puppet/question-2410919/?page=5 (http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/is-obama-a-president-or-a-puppet/question-2410919/?page=5)
55. Horn, L. R. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language, 61(1): 121-174.
56. Horn, L. R. 1989. A natural history of negation, 1st, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
57. Israel, M. 2006. "The pragmatics of polarity". In Handbook of pragmatics, Edited by: Horn, In L. and Ward, G. 701-723. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58. Israel, M. 2011. The grammar of polarity: Pragmatics, sensitivity, and the logic of scales, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and other languages, Copenhagen, Denmark: Hoest and Son.
60. Jespersen, O. 1924. The philosophy of grammar, London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
61. JMH. (2008, January 24). My younger sister loves to control me and boss me around like a two year old. What do I do? [Web log comment]. http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080123164143AARZLtS (http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080123164143AARZLtS)
62. Jones, S., Murphy, M. L., Paradis, C. and Willners, C. 2012. Antonyms in English: Construals, constructions and canonicity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63. Katz, A. 2009. "Commentary on "Does an ironic situation favor an ironic interpretation". In Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps, Edited by: Brône, G. and Vandaele, J. 401-406. Berlin, Germany and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
64. Katz, A., Blasko, D. G. and Kazmerski, V. A. 2004. Saying what you don't mean: Social influences on sarcastic language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13: 186-189.
65. Katz, A. and Ferretti, T. R. 2003. Reading proverbs in context: The role of explicit markers. Discourse Processes, 36(1): 19-46.
66. Kaup, B., Lüdtke, J. and Zwaan, R. A. 2006. Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed?. Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 1033-1050.
67. Kaup, B. and Zwaan, R. A. 2003. Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29: 439-446.
68. Kecskés, I. 1999. "The use of situation-bound utterances from an interlanguage perspective". In Pragmatics in 1998: Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Edited by: Verscheuren, J. Vol. 2, 299-310. Antwerp, Belgium: International Pragmatics Association.
69. Kecskés, I. 2000. A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 605-625.
70. Keysar, B. 1989. On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 28: 375-385.
71. Keysar, B. and Glucksberg, S. 1992. Metaphor and communication. Poetics Today, 13(4): 633-658.
72. Kotthoff, H. 1998. Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality: Double or contrastive perspectivation in conversation. Interaction and Linguistic Structures, 5: 1-27.
73. Kotthoff, H. 2003. Responding to irony in different contexts: cognition and conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35: 1387-1411.
74. Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. MacDonald, M. C. and Just, M. A. 1989. Changes in activation levels with negation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15: 633-642.
76. Murphy, M. L. 2003. Semantic relations and the lexicon, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
77. Mayo, R., Schul, Y. and Burnstein, E. 2004. "I am not guilty" versus "I am innocent": The associative structure activated in processing negations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40: 433-449.
78. Morrighan (2006, November 5). Parents'/family's reaction [Web log comment]. http://2006.nanowrimo.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=274841 (http://2006.nanowrimo.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=274841)
79. Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E. and Antos, S. J. 1978. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17: 465-478.
80. Paradis, C., van de Weijer, J., Willners, C. and Lindgren, M. 2012. Evaluative polarity of antonyms. Lingue e Linguaggio, 11(2): 155-170.
81. Paradis, C. and Willners, C. 2006. Antonymy and negation: The boundedness hypothesis. Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 1051-1080.
82. Paradis, C., Willners, C. and Jones, S. 2009. Good and bad opposites: Using textual and experimental techniques to measure antonym canonicity. The Mental Lexicon, 4(3): 380-429.
83. Partington, A. 2011. Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6): 1786-1800.
84. Pearce, D. and Rautenberg, W. 1987. "Propositional logic based on the dynamics of disbelief". In The logic of theory change, Edited by: Fuhrmann, A. and Morreau, M. 243-259. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
85. Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R. and Katz, A. N. 2000. Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes, 29: 201-222.
86. Pickering, M. and Garrod, S. in press. "An integrated theory of language production and comprehension". In Behavioral and Brain Sciences
87. Prado, J. and Noveck, I. A. 2006. How reaction times elucidate the matching bias and the way negations are processed. Thinking and Reasoning, 12: 309-328.
88. Prince, E. F. 1981. Topicalization, focus-movement, and Yiddish-movement: A pragmatic differentiation. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 7: 249-264.
89. Rockwell, P. 2000. Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29: 483-493.
90. Rockwell, P. 2007. Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36: 361-369.
91. Schwartz, A. (2010, June 14). Netanyahu-smart he is not. [in Hebrew]. http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=120300104673132&topic=146.
92. Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E. and Srinivas, K. 2000. Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1-2): 47-61.
93. Shuval, N. 2011. The processing and representation of negated constituents, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Paris Descartes.
94. Shuval, N. and Hemforth, B. 2008. Accessibility of negated constituents in reading and listening comprehension. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(4): 445-470.
95. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 1st, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
96. Ste. (2009, March 30). Beyond Lounge Ste updated. [Web log post]. http://weandwords.blogspot.co.il/2009/03/beyond-loungeste.html (http://weandwords.blogspot.co.il/2009/03/beyond-loungeste.html)
97. Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J. and Hasson, U. 2010. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107: 14425-14430.
98. Van de Voort, M. E. C. and Vonk, W. 1995. "You don't die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms". In Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives, Edited by: Everaert, M., van der Linden, E.-J., Schenk, A. and Schreuder, R. 283-299. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
99. van de Weijer, J., Paradis, C., Willners, C. and Lindgren, M. 2012. "As lexical as it gets: The role of co-occurrence of antonyms in a visual lexical decision experiment". In Frequency effects in language: Linguistic representations, Edited by: Divjak, D. and Gries, S. T. 255-279. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
100. Voyer, D. and Techentin, C. 2010. Subjective acoustic features of sarcasm: Lower, slower, and more. Metaphor and Symbol, 25: 1-16.
101. Ward, G. 1983. A pragmatic analysis of epitomization. Papers in Linguistics, 17: 145-161.
102. Ward, G. and Birner, B. J. 2006. "Information structure". In Handbook of English linguistics, Edited by: Aarts, B. and McMahon, A. 291-317. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.