Upgrade, rehouse or resettle? An assessment of the Indian government's Basic Services for the Urban Poor (BSUP) programme

Environment and Urbanization

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 177-188

  Patel, Sheela ^a  

^a SPARC ^*  (India)

Author keywords

BSUP; community participation; relocation; resettlement; subsidy based upgrading; upgrading

Indexed keywords

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; RELOCATION; SERVICE PROVISION; SUBSIDY SYSTEM; URBAN AREA; URBAN HOUSING;

INDIA;

EID: 84876010017     PISSN: 09562478     EISSN: 17460301     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956247812473731     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Almansi Florencia.Regularizing land tenure within upgrading programmes in Argentina; the cases of Promeba and Rosario Hábitat.Environment and Urbanization. 2009;Vol 21 (2): 389-414.
2. Anzorena E J.The incremental development scheme of Hyderabad.SELAVIP Newsletter. 1988;:.
3. Boonyabancha Somsook.Baan Mankong; going to scale with 'slum' and squatter upgrading in Thailand.Environment and Urbanization. 2005;Vol 17 (1): 21-46.
4. Cohen Michael ALearning by Doing: World Bank Lending for Urban Development, 1972-1982. Washington DC: World Bank; 1983:55.
5. Environment and UrbanizationVol 1, No 2, October (1989), available at http://eau.sagepub.com/content/1/2.toc.
6. Hardoy Jorge E,Satterthwaite DavidSquatter Citizen: Life in the Urban Third World. London: Earthscan Publications; 1989:388.
7. Patel Sheela,Baptist Carrie,D'Cruz Celine.Knowledge is power - informal communities assert their right to the city through SDI and community-led enumerations.Environment and Urbanization. 2012;Vol 24 (1): 13-26.
8. Sivaramakrishnan K CRe-visioning Indian Cities: The Urban Renewal Mission. New Delhi: Sage Publications; 2011:278.