Development and validation of an innovative tool for the assessment of biomechanical strategies: The timed "up and Go" - Assessment of biomechanical strategies (TUG-ABS) for individuals with stroke

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 232-240

  Faria, Christina D C M ^a,b   Teixeira Salmela, Luci F ^a   Nadeau, Sylvie ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment; Content validity; Instrument development; Mobility; Reliability; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; VIDEORECORDING; WALKING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; POSTURAL BALANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VIDEO RECORDING; WALKING;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876004125     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1107     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global burden of disease study. Lancet 1997; 349: 1436-1442.
2. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, et al. ICF Core Sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med 2004; Suppl 44: 135-141.
3. Flanbsjer U, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 75-82.
4. Hershkovitz A, Gottlieb D, Beloosesky Y, Brill S. Assessing the potential for functional improvement of stroke patients attending a geriatric day hospital. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2006; 43: 243-248.
5. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1641-1647.
6. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed "Up & Go": A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-148.
7. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 315-340.
8. Mathias S, Nayak USL, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the "Get-up and Go Test". Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 387-389.
9. Fisher WP, Harvey RF, Taylor P, Kilgore KM, Kelly CK. Rehabits: a common language of functional assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 113-122.
10. Faria CDCM, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S. Effects of the direction of turning on the Timed "Up and Go" test with stroke subjects. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009; 16: 196-206.
11. Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: characteristics. Gait Posture 1996; 4: 136-148.
12. Roy G, Nadeau S, Gravel D, Piotte F, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ. Side difference in the hip and knee joint moments during sit-tostand and stand-to-sit tasks in individuals with hemiparesis. Clin Biomech 2007; 22: 795-804.
13. Teixeira-Salmela L, Nadeau S, McBride I, Olney SJ. Effects of muscle strengthening and physical conditioning training on temporal, kinematic and kinetic variables during gait in chronic stroke survivors. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 53-60.
14. Malouin F. Observational gait analysis. In: Craik R, Oatis CA, editors. Gait analysis: theory and application. St Louis: Mosby; 1995, p. 112-124.
15. McGinley JL, Goldie P, Greenwood KM, Olney SJ. Accuracy and reliability of observational gait analysis data: judgments of pushoff in gait after stroke. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 146-160.
16. Toro B, Nester CJ, Farren PC. The status of gait assessment among physiotherapists in the United Kingdom. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1878-1884.
17. Toro B, Nester C, Farren P. A review of observational gait assessment in clinical practice. Physiother Theory Pract 2003; 19: 137-149.
18. Benson J, Clark F. A guide for instrument development and validation. Am J Occup Ther 1982; 36: 789-800.
19. Davis AE. Instrument development: getting started. J Neurosci Nurs 1996; 28: 204-207.
20. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide do their development and use. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford; 2004.
21. Blackburn M, Van Vliet P, Mockett SP. Reliability of measures obtained with the Modified Ashworth Scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 25-34.
22. Bohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 26-32.
23. Faria CDCM, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S. Predicting levels of basic functional mobility, as assessed by the Timed "Up and Go" test, for individuals with stroke: discriminant analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 146-152.
24. Faria CD, Teixeira-Salmela L, Silva EB, Nadeau S. Expanded Timed Up and Go Test with subjects with stroke: reliability and comparisons with matched healthy controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93: 1034-1038.
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity trends - United States, 1990-1998. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001; 50: 166-169.
26. Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 1997; 20: 269-274.
27. Berk RA. Importance of expert judgement in content-related validity evidence. West J Nurs Res 1990; 12: 659-671.
28. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2007; 30: 459-467.
29. Sim J, Wright CC. The Kappa statistics in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005; 83: 257-268.
30. Eastlack ME, Arvidson J, Snyder-Macler L, Danoff JV, McGarvey CL. Interrater reliability of videotaped observational gait-analysis assessments. Phys Ther 1991; 71: 465-472.
31. Toro B, Nester CJ, Farren PC. The development and validity of the Salford Gait Tool: An observaton-based clinical gait assessment tool. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 321-327.
32. Toro B, Nester CJ, Farren PC. Inter- and intraobserver repeatability of the Salford Gait Tool: an observation-based clinical gait assessment tool. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 328-332.
33. Janssen WGM, Bussmann HBJ, Stam HJ. Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement: a review. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 866-879.
34. Faria CDCM, Teixeira-Salmela L, Gomes Neto M, Rodrigues-de-Paula F. Performance-based tests in subjects with stroke: outcome scores, reliability and measurement errors. Clin Rehabil 2011; 26: 460-469.
35. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2009.
36. Jakobsson U, Westergren A. Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data. Scand J Caring Sci 2005; 19: 427-431.
37. Mackey AH, Lobb GL, Walt SE, Stott NS. Reliability and validity of the Observational Gait Scale in children with spastic diplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003; 45: 4-11.
38. Wren TAL, Rethlefsen SA, Healy BS, Do KP, Dennis SW, Kay RM. Reliability and validity of visual assessments of gait using a modified physician rating scale for crouch and foot contact. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25: 646-650.
39. Capozzo A, Croce UD, Leardini A, Chiari L. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. Gait Posture 2005; 21: 186-196.
40. States RA, Pappas E. Precision and repeatability of the Optotrack 3020 motion measurement system. J Med Eng Technol 2006; 30: 11-16.
41. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
42. Gilleard W, Crobie J, Smith R. Rising to stand from a chair: symmetry, and frontal and transverse plane kinematics and kinetics. Gait Posture 2008; 27: 8-15.
43. Krebs DE, Wong D, Jevsevar D, Riley PO, Hodge WA. Trunk kinematics during locomotor activities. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 505-514.
44. Fortin C, Nadeau S, Labelle H. Inter-trial and test-retest reliability of kinematic and kinetic gait parameters among subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 204-216.
45. Ghoussayni S, Stevens C, Durham S, Ewins D. Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals. Gait Posture 2004; 20: 266-272.
46. Stokes VP, Anderson C, Forssberg H. Rotational and translational movement features of the pelvis and thorax during adult human locomotion. J Biomech 1989; 22: 43-50.
47. Dite W, Temple VA. Development of a clinical measure of turning for older adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 857-866.
48. Thigpen M, Light KE, Creel GL, Flynn SM. Turning difficulty characteristics of adults aged 65 years or older. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 1174-1187.
49. Nadeau S, Desjardins P, Brière A, Roy G, Gravel D. A chair with a platform setup to measure the forces under each thigh when sitting, rising from a chair and sitting downs. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008; 46: 299-306.
50. Blake R, Lee S. The role of temporal structure in human vision. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2005; 4: 21-42.
51. Gage JR, Ounpuu S. Gait analysis in clinical practice. Semin Orthop 1989; 4: 72-87.
52. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986; 35: 382-385.
53. Stott NS, Atherton WG, Mackey AH, Galley IJ, Nicol RO, Wash SJ. Reliability and validity of assessment of sagittal plane deviations in children who have spastic diplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 2337-2341.
54. Keenan AM, Bach TM. Video assessment of rearfoot movements during walking: a reliability study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 651-655.
55. Sim J, Arnell P. Measurement validity in physical therapy. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 102-115.