High-intensity sound increases the size of visually perceived objects

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 501-507

  Takeshima, Yasuhiro ^a   Gyoba, Jiro ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Audition; Multisensory processing; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIZE PERCEPTION; SOUND;

EID: 84876002697     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0403-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alais, D., Newell, F. N., & Mamassian, P. (2010). Multisensory processing in review: From physiology to behavior. Seeing and Perceiving, 23, 3-38.
2. Angelaki, D. E., Gu, Y., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2009). Multisensory integration: Psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 452-458.
3. Anstis, S. M. (1974). A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research, 14, 589-592.
4. Bland, M. (1995). An introduction to medical statistics (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford Medical.
5. Brown, J. F. (1931). The visual perception of velocity. Psychologische Forschung, 14, 199-232. doi: 10. 1007/BF00403873.
6. Carello, C., Anderson, K. L., & Kunkler-Peck, A. J. (1998). Perception of object length by sound. Psychological Science, 9, 211-214.
7. Clavagnier, S., Falchier, A., & Kennedy, H. (2004). Long-distance feedback projections to area V1: Implications for multisensory integration, spatial awareness, and visual consciousness. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 117-126. doi: 10. 3758/CABN. 4. 2. 117.
8. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433. doi: 10. 1038/415429a.
9. Falchier, A., Clavagnier, S., Barone, P., & Kennedy, H. (2002). Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 5749-5759.
10. Gepshtein, S., & Banks, M. S. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology, 13, 483-488.
11. Guski, R., & Troje, N. F. (2003). Audiovisual phenomenal causality. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 789-800.
12. Hidaka, S., Manaka, Y., Teramoto, W., Sugita, Y., Miyauchi, R., Gyoba, J., & Iwaya, Y. (2009). Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object. PLoS ONE, 4(12), e8188. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0008188 1-6.
13. Kafaligonul, H., & Stoner, G. R. (2010). Auditory modulation of visual apparent motion with short spatial and temporal intervals. Journal of Vision, 10(12), 31. doi: 10. 1167/10. 12. 31 1-13.
14. Lipscomb, S. D., & Kim, E. M. (2004). Perceived match between visual parameters and auditory correlates: An experimental multimedia investigation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 72-75). Evanston, IL: Society for Music Perception and Cognition.
15. Maeda, F., Kanai, R., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion. Current Biology, 14, R990-R991.
16. Manabe, K., & Riquimaroux, H. (2000). Sound controls velocity perception of visual apparent motion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan: Part E, 21, 171-174.
17. Purves, D., Wojtach, W. T., & Lotto, R. B. (2011). Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 15588-15595.
18. Rockland, K. S., & Ojima, H. (2003). Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50, 19-26.
19. Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B., & Lau, R. (1997). Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature, 385, 308.
20. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2002). A visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 147-152. doi: 10. 1016/S0926-6410(02)00069-1.
21. Shipley, T. (1964). Auditory flutter-driving of visual flicker. Science, 145, 1328-1330.
22. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
23. Takeshima, Y., & Gyoba, J. (2011). Modification of velocity perception by loud sounds. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 30, 19-24.
24. Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 400-410. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2010. 06. 008.
25. Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (2000). Sound enhances visual perception: Cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1583-1590. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 26. 5. 1583.
26. Wada, Y., Kitagawa, N., & Noguchi, K. (2003). Audio-visual integration in temporal perception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50, 117-124.
27. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 88. 3. 638.