Quality of reporting and evidence in American academy of pediatrics guidelines

Pediatrics

Volumn 131, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 732-738

  Isaac, Andre ^a   Saginur, Michael ^a   Hartling, Lisa ^a   Robinson, Joan L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Pediatric; Practice guidelines; Quality of health care

Indexed keywords

APPRAISAL OF GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION II SCALE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 84875999911     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2027     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Richardson WC, Berwick DM, Bisgard JC, Bristow LR. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Front matter. In: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001
2. Scales DC, Dainty K, Hales B, et al. A mul-tifaceted intervention for quality improvement in a network of intensive care units: a cluster randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;305 (4):363-372
3. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223-1238
4. Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009;301(8):831-841
5. Poonacha TK, Go RS. Level of scientific evidence underlying recommendations arising from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(2):186-191
6. Lee DH, Vielemeyer O. Analysis of overall level of evidence behind Infectious Diseases Society of America practice guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(1): 18-22
7. West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47 (prepared by the Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0011). 2002:64-88. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publication No. 02-E016
8. Boluyt N, Lincke CR, Offringa M. Quality of evidence-based pediatric guidelines. Pediatrics. 2005;115(5):1378-1391
9. de Ferranti S, Ludwig DS. Storm over statins - the controversy surrounding pharmacologic treatment of children. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1309-1312
10. Diekema DS. Conducting ethical research in pediatrics: a brief historical overview and review of pediatric regulations. J Pediatr. 2006;149(1 suppl):S3-S11
11. Simpson LA, Peterson L, Lannon CM, et al. Special challenges in comparative effectiveness research on children's and adolescents' health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(10):1849-1856
12. American Academy of Pediatrics. AAP Policy. Available at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/aappolicy/index.xhtml. Accessed June 1, 2011
13. AGREE Collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II. Available at: www.agreetrust.org/?o=1397. Accessed June 1, 2011
14. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 levels of evidence. Available at: www.cebm.net/index. aspx?o=5653. Accessed June 1, 2011
15. American Academy of Pediatrics Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management. Classifying recommendations for clinical practice guidelines. Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):874-877
16. Shiffman RN, Marcuse EK, Moyer VA, et al; American Academy of Pediatrics Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management. Toward transparent clinical policies. Pediatrics. 2008;121(3):643-646
17. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121(9):1193-1254
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The community guide: guide to community preventive services. 1996. Available at: www.thecommunityguide.org/ PDFS/ECONEVAL-version3.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2011
19. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383-394
20. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1-12
21. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations for the management of patients. Can J Cardiol. 1993;9(6):487-489
22. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: International Medical Publishing; 1996
23. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289(4):454-465
24. Boyd EA, Cho MK, Bero LA. Financial conflict-of-interest policies in clinical research: issues for clinical investigators. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):769-774
25. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009
26. Licskai C, Sands T, Ong M, Paolatto L, Nicoletti I. Using a knowledge translation framework to implement asthma clinical practice guidelines in primary care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(5):538-546
27. Scott SD, Grimshaw J, Klassen TP, Nettel-Aguirre A, Johnson DW. Understanding implementation processes of clinical pathways and clinical practice guidelines in pediatric contexts: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6:133
28. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185 (5):263-267
29. Hopewell S, Dutton S, Yu LM, Chan AW, Altman DG. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ. 2010;340:c723
30. Gill PJ, Wang KY, Mant D, et al. The evidence base for interventions delivered to children in primary care: an overview of cochrane systematic reviews. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8): e23051
31. Tobe SW, Stone JA, Brouwers M, et al. Harmonization of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: the C-CHANGE Initiative. CMAJ. 2011;183(15):E1135-E1150
32. Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(18): E839-E842
33. Li T, Vedula SS, Scherer R, Dickersin K. What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):367-377