Lumen Segmentation in IOCT images using fuzzy and binary morphological reconstruction;Segmentação do lúmen em imagens de IOCT usando fuzzy connectedness e reconstrução binária morfológica

Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Biomedica

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 32-44

  Cardenas, Diego Armando Cardona ^a   Moraes, Matheus Cardoso ^a   Furuie, Sérgio Shiguemi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bhattacharyya; Fuzzy connectedness; Intravascular Optical Coherent Tomography (IOCT); Morphological operations; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

BHATTACHARYYA; BHATTACHARYYA COEFFICIENT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CORONARY HEART DISEASE; FUZZY CONNECTEDNESS; MORPHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS; MORPHOLOGICAL RECONSTRUCTION; OPTICAL COHERENT TOMOGRAPHY;

DISEASES; FUZZY SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MORPHOLOGY;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 84875992496     PISSN: 15173151     EISSN: 19847742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4322/rbeb.2013.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aherne F, Thacker N, Rockett P. The Bhattacharyya metric as an absolute similarity measure for frequency coded data. Kybernetika. 1998; 32(4):1-7.
2. Barajas J, Caballero K, Rodrigues O, Radeva P. Cardiac phase extraction in IVUS sequences using1-D Gabor filters. In: Annual International Conference Of The IEEE: Proceedings of the29th Annual International Conference Of The IEEE; 2007; Lyon. EMBS; 2007. p. 343-6 PMid:18001960.
3. Besag J. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). 1986; 48:259-302.
4. Bhattacharyya A. On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distribution. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society. 1943; 35:99-110.
5. Bouma BE, Tearney GJ, Yabushita H, Shishkov M, Kauffman CR, Gauthier DD, MacNeill BD, Houser SL, Aretz HT, Halpern EF, Jang IK. Evaluation of intracoronary stenting by intravascular optical coherence tomography. Heart. 2003; 89:317-21. PMid:12591841 PMCid:1767586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.3.317
6. Boykov YY, Jolly MP. Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary & region segmentation of objects in N-D images. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 2001 July7-14; Vancouver, Canada. Vancouver; 2001. p. 105-12.
7. Brezinski M. Optical Coherence Tomography: Principles and Applications. Academic Press; 2006.
8. Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1986; 8:679-98. PMid:21869365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851
9. Ciesielski KC, Udupa JK, Saha PK, Zhuge Y. Iterative relative fuzzy connectedness for multiple objects with multiple seeds. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 2007; 107:160-82. PMid:18769655 PMCid:2442428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2006.10.005
10. Costa RFB, Fagundes DJ. Modelos experimentais de hiperplasia intimal: efeitos da radiação ionizante. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 2002; 17(3):25-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502002000300007
11. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). 1977; 39(1):1-38.
12. Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945; 26:297-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1932409
13. Dougherty G. Digital Image Processing for Medical Applications. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
14. Dubuisson F, Kauffmann C, Motreff P, Sarry L. In vivo oct coronary imaging augmented with stent reendothelialization score. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2009; 5761:475-82.
15. Gil D, Hernandez A, Rodriguez O, Mauri J, Radeva P. Statistical strategy for anisotropic adventitia modelling in IVUS. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2006; 25(6):768-78. PMid:16768241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2006.874962
16. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital Image Processing. 3rded. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice-Hall; 2008.
17. Griñó C, Lugo F, León M, Ligero S, Ruiz JM, Montero J. Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica (OCT) Funcionamiento y utilidad en patología macular (I). Gaceta Óptica. 2008; 12-4.
18. Gurmeric S, Isguder GG, Carlier S, Unal G. A new3-d automated computational method to evaluate in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in in-vivo intravascular optical coherence tomography pullbacks. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2009; 5762:776-85.
19. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision. 1988; 1(4):321-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00133570
20. Kupinski MA, Giger ML. Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 1998; 17:510-17. PMid:9845307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/42.730396
21. Meng L, Lu B, Zhang S, Yv B. In vivo optical coherence tomography (OCT) of experimental thrombosis in a rabbit carotid model. Heart. 2007; 24:777-80.
22. Moonis G, Liu J, Udupa JK, Hackney DC. Estimation of tumor volume with fuzzy connectedness segmentation of MR Images. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2002; 23:356-63. PMid:11900999.
23. Moraes MC, Furuie SS. An approach to automatically segment the media-adventitia borders in IVUS Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica. 2010; 26(3):219-33.
24. Moraes MC, Furuie SS. Automatic coronary wall segmentation in intravascular ultrasound images using binary morphological reconstruction. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2011; 37:1486-99. PMid:21741157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.018
25. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-scale histogram. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 1979; 9(1): 62-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
26. Papadogiorgaki M, Mezaris V, Chatzizisis YS, Giannoglou GD, Kompatsiaris I. Image analysis techniques for automated ivus contour detection. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2008; 34(9):1482-98.
27. Pednekar A, Kakadiaris IA. Image segmentation based on fuzzy connectedness using dynamic weights. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2006; 15:1555-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2006.871165
28. Pollock ML, Wilmore, JH. Exercícios na saúde e na doença: avaliação e prescrição para prevenção e reabilitação. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 1993.
29. Puri R, Worthley MI, Nicholls SJ. Intravascular Imaging of Vulnerable Coronary Plaque: Current and Future Concepts. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2011; 8(3):131-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.210
30. Rieber J, Meissner O, Babaryka G, Oswald SRM, Koenig A, Schiele, T, Shapiro M, Theisen K, Reiser M, Klauss V, Hoffmann U. Diagnostic Accuracy of Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound for the Detection and Characterization of Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition In Ex-Vivo Coronary Specimens: A Comparison With Histology. Coronary Artery Disease. 2006; 17(5):425-30. PMid:16845250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00019501-200608000-00005
31. Rubinstein M, Schalch P, Di Silvio M, Betancourt MA, Wong BJ. Optical coherence tomography applications in otolaryngology. Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola, 2009; 60(5):357-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2173-5735(09)70157-7
32. Sihan K, Botka C, Post F, De Winter S, Regar E, Hamers R, Bruining N. A novel approach to quantitative analysis of intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging. Computers in Cardiology; 2008; 1089-92.
33. Souza AFL. Abordagens para a segmentação de coronárias em ecocardiografia [dissertação]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2010.
34. Souza AJN, Nascimento AJL, Carvalho AS. Reestenose Intra-stent. Opções Terapêuticas na Realidade Brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva. 2004; 12(4):193-202.
35. Tsantis S, Kagadis G, Katsanos K, Karnabatidis D, Bourantas G, Nikiforidis G. Automatic vessel lumen segmentation and stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomography. Medical Physics. 2012; 39:503-13. PMid:22225321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3673067
36. Tung KP, Shi W, De Silva R, Edwards E, Rueckert D. Automatical vessel wall detection in intravascular coronary OCT. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; 2011 Mar30-Apr02; Chicago. Chicago; 2011. p. 610-3.
37. Unal G, Bucher S, Carlier S, Slabaugh G, Fang T, Tanaka K. Shape-driven segmentation of the arterial wall in intravascular ultrasound images. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 2008; 12:335-47. PMid:18693501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2008.920620
38. Unal G, Gurmeric S, Carlier SG. Stent Implant Follow-Up in Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Images. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010; 26(7):809-16. PMid:19777367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9508-4
39. Udupa JK, LeBlanc VR, Zhuge Y, Imielinska C, Schmidt H, Currie LM, Hirsch BE, Woodburn J. A Framework for Evaluating Image Segmentation Algorithms. Computerized
40. Medical Imaging and Graphics. 2006; 30(2):75-87. PMid:16584976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2005.12.001
41. Udupa JK, Samarasekera S. Fuzzy connectedness and object definition: theory, algorithms, and applications in image segmentation. Graphical Models and Image Processing. 1996; 58(3): 246-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gmip.1996.0021
42. Udupa JK, Saha PK. Fuzzy connectedness and image segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2003; 91:1649-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2003.817883
43. World Health Organization-WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases2010. WHO; 2011a. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_report2010/en/
44. World Health Organization-WHO. Nomcommunicable diseases and mental healt. WHO; 2011b. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/countries/bra_en.pdf
45. Zaidi H, Naqa EI. PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2010; 37:1-37. PMid:20336455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1423-3