Engaging the public with online discussion and spatial annotations: The generation and transformation of public knowledge

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 39-56

  Bamberg, Jarkko ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

knowledge in practice; online discussion; public knowledge; public participation; spatial annotations; urban planning

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE; LAND USE PLANNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PLANNING PROCESS; SPATIAL PLANNING; URBAN PLANNING;

FINLAND; PIRKANMAA; TAMPERE;

EID: 84875944397     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2012.738306     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Asikainen, E. and Jokinen, A. 2009. Future natures in the making: Implementing biodiversity in suburban land-use planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3): 351-368.
2. Bäcklund, P. and Mäntysalo, R. 2010. Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice-The case of Finland. Planning Theory, 9: 333-350.
3. Bamberg, J. 2010. Ambiguities in knowledge production: Multimodal analysis of discourse and dramaturgy in public participation GIS experiments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37: 895-910.
4. Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
5. Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. 2000. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Callon, M. and Rabeharisoa, V. 2004. Gino's lesson on humanity: Genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist's role. Economy and Society, 33: 1-27.
7. Campbell, H. and Marshall, R. 2000. Public involvement and planning: Looking beyond the one to the many. International Planning Studies, 5: 321-344.
8. Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R. and Turton, I. 2001. Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-line spatial support systems. Environment and Planning B, 28: 907-921.
9. Corburn, J. 2003. Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: Improving urban planning for communities at risk. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22: 420-433.
10. Corburn, J. 2005. Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D., eds. 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems, London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
12. Dahlgren, P. 2009. Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication and democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Dewey, J. 1927/1991. The public and its problems, Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
14. Elwood, S. 2009. Geographic information science: New geovisualization technologies-Emerging questions and linkages with GI science research. Progress in Human Geography, 33: 256-263.
15. Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge, Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.
16. Fischer, F. and Forester, J. 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning, Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.
17. Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and power, London: University of Chicago Press.
18. Foucault, M. 1984. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977, New York, NY: Pantheon.
19. Hajer, M. 2006. The living institutions of the EU: Analysing governance as performance. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7(1): 41-55.
20. Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H., eds. 2003. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature, New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies, London: Macmillan.
23. Hopfer, S. and MacEachren, A. M. 2007. Leveraging the potential of geospatial annotations for collaboration: A communication theory perspective. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21: 921-934.
24. Irwin, A. and Michael, M. 2003. Science, social theory and public knowledge, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
25. Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities, New York, NY: Random House.
26. Jankowski, P. 2009. Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 1966-1971.
27. Kingston, R., Carver, S., Evans, A. and Turton, I. 2000. Web-based public participation geographical information systems: An aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24: 109-125.
28. Kingston, R. 2007. Public participation in local policy decision-making: The role of web-based mapping. Cartographic Journal, 44(2): 138-144.
29. Krimsky, S. 1984. Epistemic considerations on the value of folk-wisdom in science and technology. Policy Studies Review, 3(2): 246-262.
30. Laine, M. 2006. "Fight over the face of Tampere. A sneaking transformation of a local political field". In How nature speaks: The dynamics of the human ecological condition, Edited by: Haila, Y. and Dyke, C. 177-197. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31. Laine, M. and Peltonen, L. 2005. "Regime stability and restructuration: From industrial to informational city". In Analysing efforts to generate local dynamism in the city of Tampere, Edited by: Kasvio, A. and Anttiroiko, A.-V. 353-396. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
32. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Leino, H. and Laine, M. 2011. Do matters of concern matter? Bringing issues back to participation. Planning Theory, doi:10.1177/1473095211417595
34. Madanipour, A., Hull, A. and Healey, P. 2001. The governance of place: Space and planning processes, Aldershot: Ashgate.
35. Marres, N. 2007. The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37: 759-780.
36. Peng, Z.-R. 2001. Internet GIS for public participation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28: 889-905.
37. Rinner, C. 2001. Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28: 847-863.
38. Rinner, C. 2006. "Argumentation mapping in collaborative spatial decision making". In Collaborative geographic information systems, Edited by: Balram, S. and Dragicevic, S. 85-102. Idea Group.
39. Rinner, C. and Bird, M. 2009. Evaluating community engagement through argumentation maps-A public participation GIS case study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36: 588-601.
40. Rydin, Y. 2007. Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6: 52-68.
41. Schön, D. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, New York, NY: Basic Books.
42. Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43. Sieber, R. 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96: 491-507.
44. Wagenaar, H. 2004. "Knowing" the rules: Administrative work as practice. Public Administration Review, 64: 643-655.
45. Wagenaar, H. 2007. Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: How citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline. American Review of Public Administration, 37(17): 17-50.
46. Van Herzele, A. and Van Woerkum, C. M. J. 2008. Local knowledge in visually mediated practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27: 444-455.
47. van Lieshout, M., Dewulf, A., Aarts, N. and Termeer, C. 2011. Do scale frames matter? Scale frame mismatches in the decision making process about a "mega farm" in a small Dutch village. Ecology and Society, 16(1) Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art38