Comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors in persons with multiple sclerosis and controls

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 725-731

  Sandroff, Brian M ^a   Motl, Robert W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Accelerometry; ActiGraph; Multiple sclerosis; Physical activity; Walking

Indexed keywords

ACTIMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; EQUIPMENT; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TIME; WALKING;

ACTIGRAPHY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALIBRATION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875943000     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.707745     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Motl RW, Sandroff BM. Objective monitoring of physical activity behavior in multiple sclerosis. Phys Ther Rev 2010;15:204-211.
2. Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM, Scott JA. Validity of physical activity measures in ambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1151-1156.
3. Motl RW, Zhu W, Park Y, McAuley E, Scott JA, Snook EM. Reliability of scores from physical activity monitors in adults with multiple sclerosis. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2007;24:245-253.
4. Motl RW, Sosnoff JJ, Dlugonski D, Suh Y, Goldman M. Does a waist-worn accelerometer capture intra- and inter-person variation in walking behavior among persons with multiple sclerosis? Med Eng Phys 2010;32:1224-1228.
5. Motl RW, Snook EM, Agiovlasitis S. Does an accelerometer accurately measure steps taken under controlled conditions in adults with mild multiple sclerosis? Disabil Health J 2011;4:52-57.
6. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:777-781.
7. Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:S442-S449.
8. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr, O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:S450-S456.
9. Matthew CE. Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37:S512-S522.
10. Paul DR, Kramer M, Moshfegh AJ, Baer DJ, Rumpler WV. Comparison of two different physical activity monitors. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:26.
11. Kozey SL, Staudenmayer JW, Troiano RP, Freedson PS. Comparison of the ActiGraph 7164 and the ActiGraph GT1M during self-paced locomotion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:971-976.
12. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport 2011;14:411-416.
13. Martin CL, Phillips BA, Kilpatrick TJ, Butzkueven H, Tubridy N, McDonald E, Galea MP. Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability. Mult Scler 2006;12:620-628.
14. Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci 1992;17:338-345.
15. Hadjimichael O, Kerns RD, Rizzo MA, Cutter G, Vollmer T. Persistent pain and uncomfortable sensations in persons with multiple sclerosis. Pain 2007;127:35-41.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
17. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428.
18. Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res 1998;7:301-317.