A methodology for action-selection using value-based argumentation

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 264-275

  Nawwab, Fahd Saud ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a   Dunne, Paul E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Applications; Decision making based on argumentation; Reasoning about action using argument

Indexed keywords

PROBLEM SOLVING;

ACTION SELECTION; ALTERNATING TRANSITION SYSTEM; ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES; CRITICAL QUESTIONS; DECISION MAKING BASED ON ARGUMENTATION; DECISIONS MAKINGS; MOST LIKELY; REASONING ABOUT ACTION USING ARGUMENT; REASONING ABOUT ACTIONS; VALUE-BASED ARGUMENTATIONS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84875914213     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. K. Atkinson. What should we do? Computational representation of persuasive argument in practical reasoning. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, 2005.
2. K. Atkinson and T. Bench-Capon. Action based alternating transition systems for arguments about action. In Proceedings of the Twenty Second Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007), Vancouver, Canada, pp. 24-29. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
3. K. Atkinson, P. McBurney, and T. Bench-Capon. Computational representation of practical arguments. Synthese, 152(2):157-206,pages 191-240, 2006.
4. T. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3):429-448, 2003.
5. T.J.M. Bench-Capon, S. Doutre and P.E. Dunne. Audiences in Argumentation Frameworks. Artificial Intelligence, Vol 171 no 1, pp42-71, 2007.
6. A. Damasio. Descartes' Error. G P Putnam and Sons, 1994.
7. S. Modgil. Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks. In: Proc. 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 297-310.
8. J. R. Searle. Rationality in Action. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2003.
9. D. N. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1996.
10. M. Wooldridge and W. van der Hoek. On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract. J. Applied Logic, 3(3-4):396-420, 2005.