Analyzing the effects of shared decision-making, empathy and team interaction on patient satisfaction and treatment acceptance in medical rehabilitation using a structural equation modeling approach

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 167-175

  Quaschning, Katharina ^a   Körner, Mirjam ^b   Wirtz, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Empathy; Medical rehabilitation; Patient satisfaction; Shared decision making; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EMPATHY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY; SHARED DECISION MAKING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TEAMWORK;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; EMPATHY; HUMANS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REHABILITATION;

EID: 84875911879     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Faller H. Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation. Die Rehabil 2003, 42:129-135. [in German].
2. Di Blasi Z., Harkness E., Ernst E., Georgiou A., Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 2001, 357:757-762.
3. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:681-692.
4. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999, 49:651-661.
5. Giersdorf N., Loh A., Bieber C., Caspari C., Deinzer A., Doering T., et al. Development and validation of assessment instruments for shared decision making. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 2004, 47:969-976.
6. Simon D., Loh A., Härter M. Development and evaluation of interventions to support shared decision making - framework and measuring instruments. Z Med Psychol 2008, 17:149-159. [in German].
7. Farin E. Patient-provider communication in chronic illness: current state of research in selected areas. Die Rehabil 2010, 49:277-291. [in German].
8. Harrison D.E., Galloway S., Graydon J.E., Palmer-Wickham S., Rich-van der Bij L. Information needs and preference for information of women with breast cancer over a first course of radiation therapy. Patient Educ Couns 1999, 38:217-225.
9. Robinson A., Thomson R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Saf Health Care 2001, 10:i34-i38.
10. Jenkins V., Fallowfield L., Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Brit J Cancer 2001, 84:48-51.
11. Strull W.M., Lo B., Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?. J Amer Med Assoc 1984, 252:2990-2994.
12. Neuderth S., Steinbüchel T., Schowalter M., Richard M., Störk S., Angermann C., et al. Educational needs among patients with chronic heart failure. Z Med Psychol 2006, 15:77-85. [in German].
13. Scheibler F., Janssen C., Pfaff H. Shared decision making: an overview of international research literature. Soz Praventiv Med 2003, 48:11-23. [in German].
14. Say R., Murtagh M., Thomson R. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 60:102-114.
15. Loh A., Simon D., Kriston L., Härter M. Shared decision making in medicine. Dtsch Arztebl 2007, 104. A-1483/B-1314/C-1254 [in German].
16. Gattellari M., Voigt K.J., Butow P.N., Tattersall M.H.N. When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions?. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:503-513.
17. Arora N.K. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57:791-806.
18. Stewart M.A. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995, 152:1423-1433.
19. Stewart M., Brown J.B., Donner A., McWhinney I.R., Oates J., Weston W.W., et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. Fam Pract 2000, 49:796-804.
20. Neumann M., Wirtz M., Bollschweiler E., Warm M., Wolf J., Pfaff H. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the " Consultation and Relational Empathy" (CARE) measure at the example of cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2008, 58:5-15. [in German].
21. Mercer S.W., Murphy D.J. Validity and reliability of the CARE measure in secondary care. Clin Govern: Int J 2008, 13:269-283.
22. Kim S.S., Kaplowitz S., Johnston M.V. The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. J Eval Health Prof 2004, 27:237-251.
23. Roter D.L., Stewart M., Putnam S., Lipkin M.J., Stiles W., Inui T. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. J Amer Med Assoc 1997, 277:350-356.
24. Zachariae R., Pedersen C., Jensen A., Ehrnrooth E., Rossen P., von der Maase H. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over disease. Brit J Cancer 2003, 88:658-665.
25. Suchman A., Roter D., Green M., Lipkin M.J. Physician satisfaction with primary care office visits Collaborative Study Group of the American Academy on Physician and Patient. Med Care 1993, 31:1083-1092.
26. Maguire P., Pitceathly C. Key communication skills and how to acquire them. Brit Med J 2002, 325:697-700.
27. Lemieux-Charles L., McGuire W.L. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2006, 63:263-300.
28. Schmitt M.H. Collaboration improves the quality of care: methodological challenges and evidence from US health care research. J Interprof Care 2001, 15:47-66.
29. Bower P., Campbell S., Bojke C., Sibbald B. Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study. Qual Saf Health Care 2003, 12:273-279.
30. Wagner E.H. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. Brit Med J 2000, 320:569-572.
31. Grumbach K., Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice?. J Amer Med Assoc 2004, 291:1246-1251.
32. Valentine M.A., Nemhard I.M., Edmondson A.C. Measuring teamwork in health care settings: a review of survey instruments. Working Paper 2011, [accessed 14.04.12]. http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/11-116.pdf.
33. Davenport D.L., Henderson W.G., Mosca C.L., Khuri S.F., Mentzer R.M. Risk-adjusted morbidity in teaching hospitals correlates with reported levels of communication and Collaboration on surgical teams but not with scale measures of teamwork climate, safety climate, or working conditions. J Amer Coll Surg 2007, 205:778-784.
34. Körner M. A model of shared decision making in medical rehabilitation. Die Rehabil 2009, 48:160-165. [in German].
35. Körner M., Ehrhardt H., Steger A.K., Bengel J. Interprofessional SDM train-the-trainer program " Fit for SDM" : provider satisfaction and impact on partizipation. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 89:122-128. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.04.008.
36. Körner M. Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team model. Clin Rehabil 2010, 24:745-755.
37. Körner M. Development and evaluation of a shared-decision-making training programme in medical rehabilitation. Final report 2012, http://www.forschung-patientenorientierung.de/index.php/projekte/erste-foerderphase/modul-zwei-phase-1/pefit-koerner.html [accessed 14.06.12; in German].
38. Kriston L., Scholl I., Hölzel L., Simon D., Loh A., Härter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 80:94-99.
39. Simon D., Schorr G., Wirtz M., Vodermaier A., Caspari C., Neuner B., et al. Development and first validation of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Educ Couns 2006, 63:319-327.
40. Mercer S.W., Reynolds W.J. Empathy and quality of care. Brit J Gen Pract 2002, 52:9-13.
41. Mercer S.W., Reilly D. A qualitative study of patient's views on the consultation at the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital, an NHS integrative complementary and orthodox medical care unit. Patient Educ Couns 2004, 53:13-18.
42. Mercer S.W., Neumann M., Wirtz M., Fitzpatrick B., Vojt G. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland - a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:240-245.
43. Neumann M., Wirtz M., Bollschweiler E., Mercer S.W., Warm M., Wolf J., et al. Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 69:63-75.
44. Wirtz M., Boecker M., Forkmann T., Neumann M. Evaluation of the " Consultation and Relational Empathy" (CARE) measure by means of Rasch-analysis at the example of cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 82:298-306.
45. Man-Son-Hing M., Laupacis A., O'Connor A.M., Biggs J., Drake E., Yetisir E., et al. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. J Amer Med Assoc 1999, 282:737-743.
46. Weiber R., Mühlhaus D. Strukturgleichungsmodellierung: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in die Kausalanalyse mit Hilfe von AMOS SmartPLS und SPSS 2010, Springer, Berlin.
47. Schmidt J., Lamprecht F., Wittmann W.W. Satisfaction with inpatient management. Development of a questionnaire and initial validity studies. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1989, 39:248-255. [in German].
48. Attkisson C.C., Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 1982, 5:233-237.
49. GfQG - Gesellschaft für Qualität im Gesundheitswesen Questionnaire on Patient Satisfaction (ZUF-8) 2012, http://www.gfqg.de/assessment_zuf8.htm [accessed 17.02.12; in German].
50. Kriz D., Nübling R., Steffanowski A., Rieger J., Schmidt J. Patientenzufriedenheit: Psychometrische Reanalyse des ZUF-8 DRV-Schriften Band 77. Berl Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund 2008, 84-85.
51. Graham J.W., Cumsille P.E., Elek-Fisk E. Methods for handling missing data. Handbook of psychology 2003, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
52. SPSS Version 19 2012, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, [accessed 20.03.12]. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/de/analytics/spss/.
53. Arbuckle J. Amos 19 user's guide 2010, [accessed 10.06.12]. http://www.amosdevelopment.com/download/amos.pdf.
54. Hoogland J.J., Boomsma A. Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: an overview and a meta-analysis. Sociol Methods Res 1998, 26:329-367.
55. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2005, Guildford, New York.
56. Bollen K. Structural equations with latent variables 1989, Wiley, New York.
57. Bühner M. Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion 2011, Pearson Studium, München. Boston [u.a.]. 3 ed.
58. Bentler P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990, 107:238-246.
59. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E. Multivariate data analysis 2010, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 7th ed.
60. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 1981, 18:39-50.
61. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008, 40:879-891.
62. West S.G., Finch J.F., Curran P.J. Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications 1995, Sage, Newbury Park, CA. R. Hoyle (Ed.).
63. Parchman M.L., Zeber J.E., Palmer R.F. Participatory decision making, patient activation, medication adherence and intermediate clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Ann Fam Med 2010, 8:410-417.
64. Thompson L., McCabe R The effect of clinician-patient alliance and communication on treatment adherence in mental health care: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12:87.
65. Mackey K., Parchman M.P., Leykum L.K., Lanham H.J., Noel P.H., Zeber JE Impact of the chronic care model on medication adherence when patients perceive cost as a barrier. Prim Care Diabetes 2012, 6:137-142.
66. Zeber J.E., Copeland L.A., Good C.B., Fine M.J., Bauer M.S., Kilbourne AM Therapeutic alliance perceptions and medication adherence in patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2008, 107:53-62.