Predictors of consent in tissue donation: Interpersonal aspects and information provision during requests by phone

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 161-166

  Dorflinger, Lindsey ^a   Auerbach, Stephen M ^b   Siminoff, Laura A ^b  

^a VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Donation; Transplantation; Working alliance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIO RECORDING; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; ORGAN DONOR; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; TELECONSULTATION;

COMMUNICATION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; FAMILY RELATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84875885982     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Siminoff L.A., Lawrence R.H., Arnold R.M. Comparison of black and white families' experiences and perceptions regarding organ donation request. Crit Care 2003, 31:146-151.
2. Rocheleau C.A. Increasing family consent for organ donation: findings and challenges. Prog Transplant 2001, 11:194-200.
3. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: Current U.S. Waiting List. Updated 21.09.12 [accessed 30.09.012]. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/latestData/rptData.asp.
4. Harrison T.R., Morgan S.E., Di Corcia M.J. Effects of information, education, and communication training about organ donation for gatekeepers: clerks at the Department of Motor Vehicles and organ donation registries. Prog Transplant 2008, 18:301-309.
5. Sanner M.A. People's attitudes and reactions to organ donation. Mortality 2006, 11:133-150.
6. Cantarovich F., Heguilen R., Filho M.A., Duro-Garcia V., Fitzgerald R., Mayrhofer-Reinhartshuber D., et al. An international opinion poll of well-educated people regarding awareness and feelings about organ donation for transplantation. Transpl Int 2007, 20:512-518.
7. Delbosc B. Difficult cornea procurement: causes and consequences of the exceptional situation in France. J Fr Ophtalmol 2001, 23:196-199.
8. Muraine M., Toubeau D., Menguy E., Brasseur G. Analysing the various obstacles to cornea postmortem procurement. Br J Ophthalmol 2002, 86:864-868.
9. Caplan A., Siminoff A., Arnold R., Virnig B. Increasing organ and tissue donation: what are the obstacles, what are our options?. The surgeon general's workshop on increasing organ donation 1991.
10. Siminoff L.A., Traino H.M., Gordon N.H. Determinants of family consent to tissue donation. J Trauma 2010, 69:956-963.
11. Siminoff L.A., Traino H.M., Gordon N.H. An exploratory study of relational, persuasive, and nonverbal communication in requests for tissue donation. J Health Commun 2011, 16:955-975.
12. Siminoff L.A., Step M.M. A comprehensive observational coding scheme for analyzing instrumental, affective and relational communication in healthcare contexts. J Health Commun 2011, 16:178-197.
13. Rodrigue J.R., Scott M.P., Oppenheim A.R. The tissue donation experience: a comparison of donor and nondonor families. Prog Transplant 2003, 13:258-264.
14. Beard J., Ireland L., Davis N., Barr J. Tissue donation: what does it mean to families?. Prog Transplant 2002, 12:42-48.
15. Rosel J., Frutos M.A., Blanca M.J., Ruiz P. Discriminant variables between organ donors and nondonors: a posthoc investigation. J Transpl Coord 1999, 9:50-53.
16. Wilson P., Sexton W., Singh A., Smith M., Durham S., Cowie A., et al. Family experiences of tissue donation in Australia. Prog Transplant 2006, 16:52-56.
17. DeJong W., Franz H.G., Wolfe S.M., Nathan H., Payne D., Reitsma W., et al. Requesting organ donation: an interview study of donor and nondonor families. Am J Crit Care 1998, 7:13-23.
18. Siminoff L.A., Gordon N., Hewlett J., Arnold R.M. Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. J Amer Med Assoc 2001, 286:74-77.
19. Epstein R.M., Street R.L. Patient centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering 2007, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, NIH Publication No. 07-6225.
20. Kiesler D.J., Auerbach S.M. Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician-patient interaction: the interpersonal circumplex. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57:1707-1722.
21. Street R.L., Millay B. Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters. Health Commun 2001, 13:61-73.
22. Street R.L., Gordon H.S., Ward M.M., Krupat E., Kravitz R.L. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care 2005, 43:960-969.
23. Kiesler D.J., Anchin J.C., Perkins M.J., Chirico B.M., Kyle E.M., Federman E.J. The Impact Message Inventory: form II 1985, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
24. Baughn D., Auerbach S.M., Siminoff L.A. Roles of sex and ethnicity in procurement coordinator-family communication during the organ donation discussion. Prog Transplant 2010, 20:247-255.
25. Kiesler D.J., Schmidt J.A. The Impact Message Inventory: form IIA octant scale version 1993, Mind Garden, Palo Alto, CA.
26. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:681-692.
27. Braddock C.H., Fihn S.D., Levinson W., Jonsen A.R., Pearlman R.A. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions. Informed decision making in the outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med 1997, 12:339-345.
28. Kiesler D.J., Auerbach S.M. Participatory Style of the Physician Scale 2003, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
29. Anker A.E. Difficult communication: compliance-gaining strategies of organ procurement coordinators. J Health Commun 2011, 16:372-392.