Transition of legacy systems to semantically enabled applications: TAO method and tools

Semantic Web

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 157-168

  Wang, Hai H ^a   Damljanovic, Danica ^d   Payne, Terry ^b   Gibbins, Nicholas ^c   Bontcheva, Kalina ^d  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Annotation; Semantic Web Services

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875856334     PISSN: 15700844     EISSN: 22104968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/SW-2011-0039     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Florence Amardeilh, Bernard Vatant, Nicholas Gibbins, Terry R. Payne, and Hai H.Wang. Sws bootstrapping methodology. Technical Report D1.2.2, TAO Project Deliverable, 2009. http://www.taoproject.eu/resources/publicdeliverables/d1-2- 2.pdf.
2. Grigoris Antoniou and Frank van Harmelen. A Semantic Web Primer. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2. edition, 2008.
3. Kalina Bontcheva, Ian Roberts, Milan Agatonovic, Julien Nioche, and James Sun. Case study 1: Requirement analysis and application of tao methodology in data intensive applications. Technical Report D6.1, TAO Project Deliverable, 2007. http://www.gate.ac.uk/projects/tao/webpage/deliverables/d6-1.pdf.
4. Damljanovic D. and Bontcheva K. Gate case study: Experiments and evaluation of testbed. Technical Report D6.4, TAO project, 2009. http://www.taoproject.eu/resources/publicdeliverables/d6-4.pdf.
5. Damljanovic D., Bontcheva K., Tablan V., Roberts I., Agatonovic M., Andrey S., and Sun J. Gate case study: Domain ontology and semantic augmentation of legacy content. Technical Report D6.2, TAO project, 2008. http://www.taoproject.eu/resources/publicdeliverables/d6-2.pdf.
6. Cerbah F. Case study 2: Domain ontology building and semantic augmentation of legacy content. Technical Report D7.2, TAO project, 2008. http://www.taoproject.eu/resources/publicdeliverables/d7-2.pdf.
7. Mariano Fernandez-Lopez, Asun Gomez-Perez, Jerome Euzenat, Aldo Gangemi, Y. Kalfoglou, D. Pisanelli, M. Schorlemmer, G. Steve, Ljilajana Stojanovic, Gerd Stumme, and York Sure. A survey on methodologies for developing, maintaining, integration, evaluation and reengineering ontologies. Ontoweb deliverable, Universidad Politecnia de Madrid, 2002. http://www.aifb.uni-karsruhe.de/WBS/ysu/ publications/OntoWeb-Del-1-4.pdf.
8. Gerald C. Gannod, Huimin Zhu, and Sudhakiran V. Mudiam. On-the-fly wrapping of web services to support dynamic integration. In WCRE '03: Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, page 175, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
9. Asunción Gómez-Pérez and David Manzano-Macho. An overview of methods and tools for ontology learning from texts. Knowl. Eng. Rev., 19(3):187-212, 2004.
10. Miha Grcar. Ontology learning services library. Technical Report D2.2.2, TAO Project Deliverable, 2008. http://www.gate.ac.uk/projects/tao/webpage/ deliverables/d2-2-2.pdf.
11. Miha Grcar, Dunja Mladenic, Marko Grobelnik, Blaz Fortuna, and Janez Brank. Ontology learning implementation. Technical Report D2.2, TAO Project Deliverable, 2007. http://www.gate.ac.uk/projects/tao/webpage/deliverables/d2-2. pdf.
12. Thomas R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis., 5(2):199-220, 1993.
13. Dean Jones, Trevor Bench-Capon, and Pepijn Visser. Methodologies for ontology development. In Proceedings of IT&KNOWS Conference of the 15 th IFIP World Computer Congress, pages 62-75. Chapman and Hall Ltd, 1998.
14. Atanas Kiryakov, Damyan Ognyanov, and Dimitar Manov. Owlim-a pragmatic semantic repository for owl. In Int. Workshop on Scalable SemanticWeb Knowledge Base Systems, pages 182-192, New York City, USA, 2005. Springer-Verlag.
15. Holger Lausen and Joel Farrell. Semantic annotations for WSDL and XML schema. W3C recommendation, W3C, August 2007.
16. Giusy Di Lorenzo, Anna Rita Fasolino, Lorenzo Melcarne, Porfirio Tramontana, and Valeria Vittorini. Turning web applications into web services by wrapping techniques. In WCRE '07: Proceedings of the 14th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 199-208, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society.
17. A. Lozano-Tello and A. Gómez-Pérez. ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology. Journal of Database Management, 15(2), April-June 2004.
18. Alexander Maedche and Steffen Staab. Measuring similarity between ontologies. In EKAW '02: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, pages 251-263, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
19. Sheila A. McIlraith, Tran Cao Son, and Honglei Zeng. Semantic web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):46-53, 2001.
20. Tomás Pariente, Germán Herrero, Danica Damljanovic, and Farid Cerbah. D1.3.2 case study reports on evaluating the methodology. Technical Report D1.3.2, TAO project, 2009. http://www.tao-project.eu/resources/ publicdeliverables/d1-3-2-final.pdf.
21. Robert Porzel and Rainer Malaka. A task-based approach for ontology evaluation. In Proceedings of ECAI 2004 Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, Valencia, Spain, 2004. Springer-Verlag.
22. Bill Swartout, Ramesh Patil, Kevin Knight, and Tom Russ. Toward distributed use of large-scale ontologies. In 10th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Canada, June 1996.
23. Valentin Tablan, Danica Damljanovic, and Kalina Bontcheva. A natural language query interface to structured information. In Proceedings of the 5th European semantic web conference on The semantic web: research and applications, ESWC'08, pages 361-375, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.
24. Marinova Z. Heterogeneous knowledge store. Technical Report D4.2, TAO Project Deliverable, 2008. http://www.gate.ac.uk/projects/tao/webpage/ deliverables/d4-2.pdf.