Linking administrative behavior and student learning: The learning centered academic unit

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 60-84

  Del Favero, Marietta ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875844090     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327930PJE7703_4     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Banta, T. W., & Kuh, G. D. (1998, March/April). A missing link in assessment: Collaboration between academic and student affairs professionals. Change, 30, 40–46.
2. Bess, J. L. (1988). Collegiality and bureaucracy in the modern university. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Birnbaum, R. (1988). How academic leadership works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1984). Modern approaches to understanding and managing organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Bowen, H. R., & Schuster, J. H. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
9. Brady, S. M. (1999, Winter). Students at the center of education: A collaborative effort. Liberal Education, 85, 14–21.
10. Braxton, J. M. (1986). The normative structure of science: Social control in the academic profession. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, II, 309–357.
11. Braxton, J. M., & Bayer, A. E. (1999). Faculty misconduct in collegiate teaching. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Braxton, J. M., Eimers, M. T., & Bayer, A. E. (1996). The implications of teaching norms for the improvement of undergraduate education. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 603–625.
13. Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Cutright, M. (2001). Academic disciplines: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. A book review. Retrieved March 27, 2001, from coe.asu.edu/edrev/reviews/rev106.htm
15. Dill, D. D. (1982). The management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integration. Higher Education, 11, 303–320.
16. Donald, J. G. (1997). Improving the environment for learning: Academic leaders talk about what works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Downey, J. (2000). Balancing, corporation, collegium, and community. In M. C. Brown II (Ed.), Organization and governance in higher education (5th ed., pp. 305–312). Boston: Pearson.
18. Ewell, P. T. (1985). Transformation leadership for improving student outcomes (NCHEMS Monograph No. 6). Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
19. Gabelnick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R., & Smith, B. L. (1990, Spring). Making learning communities work: Issues of implementation and sustainability. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 41, 39–51.
20. Guskin, A. E. (1994). Reducing student costs and enhancing learning. Change, 26(4), 23–29.
21. Haberman, M. (1972). Evaluating deans: A guide to assessment of leadership in schools of education. Journal of Teacher Education, 23(2), 126–128.
22. Holland, J. (1973). Making vocational choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
24. Kuh, G. D. (1993, Fall). Ethos: Its influence on student learning. Liberal Education, 79(4), 22–31.
25. Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 123–155.
26. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 135–148.
27. Kuh, G. D., Douglas, K. B., Lund, J. P., & Ramin-Gyurnek, J. (1994). Student learning outside the classroom: Transcending artificial boundaries (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8). Washington, DC: Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED39444)
28. Layzell, D. T. (1996). Faculty workload and productivity: Recurrent issues with new imperatives. The Review of Higher Education, 19, 267–281.
29. Lewis, P. H. (1994). Creating a culture of leadership. New Directions for Higher Education, 87, 5–9.
30. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Meyer, J. M., & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. W. Meyer and Associates (Eds.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78–109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1983). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
34. Morphew, C. C. (1999). Challenges facing shared governance within the college. New Directions for Higher Education, 105, 71–79.
35. Parsons, T. (1971). The strange case of academic organization. Journal of Higher Education, 47, 486–495.
36. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37. Peterson, M. W. (1988). The organizational environment for student learning. In J. Stark & L. A. Mets (Eds.), New directions for institutional research (Vol. 57, pp. 23–37). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Sewell, W. H. J. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.
39. Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., & Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
40. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.
41. Trow, M. (1977). Departments as contexts for teaching and learning. In D. E. McHenry (Ed.), Academic departments (pp. 12–33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Watson, L. W., & Stage, F. K. (1999). Enhancing student learning: Setting the campus context. Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.
43. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
44. Wheatley, M. J. (1994). Leadership and the new science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
45. Yukl, G. (1989). Leadership in organizations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.