Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: Cost effectiveness analysis

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 346, Issue 7901, 2013, Pages

  Pennington, Mark ^a   Grieve, Richard ^a   Sekhon, Jasjeet S ^b   Gregg, Paul ^c,d   Black, Nick ^a   Van Der Meulen, Jan H ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d National Joint Registry for England and Wales   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTED PROSTHESIS; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; HYBRID PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875830136     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f1026     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hip replacement implants - global pipeline analysis, competitive landscape and market forecasts to 2017. MarketResearch.com, 2011.
2. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. National joint registry, 8th annual report. NJR, 2011.
3. Hip and knee replacements in Canada - Canadian Joint replacement Registry (CJRR) 2008-2009 annual report. Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2009.
4. Graves S, Davidson D, de Steiger R, Tomkins A, Ryan P, Griffith L, et al. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual report. AOA, 2011.
5. Mendenhall S. Hip and knee implant review. Orthopedic News Network 2004;14:1-16.
6. Stea S, Bordini B, De Clerico M, Petropulacos K, Toni A. First hip arthroplasty register in Italy: 55,000 cases and 7 year follow-up. Int Orthop 2009;33:339-46.
7. Hip and knee implant list prices rise 6.3 percent. Orthopedic Network News 2008;19:1-9.
8. McMinn DJW, Snell KIE, Daniel J, Treacy RBC, Pynsent PB, Riley RD. Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study. 2012;344:e3319.
9. Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford Jr JM. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2007;78:315-26.
10. Di Tanna GL, Ferro S, Cipriani F, Bordini B, Stea S, Toni A, et al. Modeling the cost-effectiveness for cement-less and hybrid prosthesis in total hip replacement in Emilia Romagna, Italy. J Surg Res 2010;169:227-33.
11. Givon U, Ginsberg GM, Horoszowski H, Shemer J. Cost-utility analysis of total hip arthroplasties: technology assessment of surgical procedures by mailed questionnaires. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998;14:735-42.
12. Marinelli M, Soccetti A, Panfoli N, Palma L. Cost-effectiveness of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A Markov decision analysis based on implant cost. J Orthop Traumatol 2008;9:23-8.
13. Provisional Monthly Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England: April 2009-April 2010: pre- and post-operative data: experimental statistics. Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2010.
14. Briggs A, Sculpher M. An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 1998;13:397-409.
15. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Malchau H. The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment: the case of total hip replacement. Applied Health Economics Health Policy 2004;3:79-89.
16. Hospital Episode Statistics for England. Inpatient statistics: NHS Information Centre; 2009.
17. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:185-90.
18. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990;16:199-208.
19. ASA Physical Status Classification System. American Society of Anesthesiologists.
20. Noble M, Mclennan D, Wilkinson K, Whitworth A, Exley S, Barnes H, et al. The English Indices of Deprivation 2007. Department of Communities and Local Government, 2007.
21. Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI, Gjessing HK, Vollset SE. Mortality after total hip replacement: 0-10-year follow-up of 39,543 patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:19-27.
22. Lemon MA, Hamilton PD, Field RE. Comparing total hip and knee replacement costs. Br J Healthcare Manage 2008;14:108-12.
23. Length of stay - reducing length of stay. National Health Service, Institute for Innovation and Improvement, 2008.
24. Metz CM, Freiberg AA. An international comparative study of total hip arthroplasty cost and practice patterns. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:296-8.
25. Klouche S, Sariali E, Mamoudy P. Total hip arthroplasty revision due to infection: a cost analysis approach. Orthop Traumatol: Surg Res 2010;96:124-32.
26. Sekhon JS, Grieve R. A matching method for improving covariate balance in cost-effectiveness analyses. Health Econ 2011;21:695-714.
27. Grieve R, Sekhon JS, Hu T-W, Bloom JR. Evaluating health care programs by combining cost with quality of life measures: a case study comparing capitation and fee for service. Health Serv Res 2008;43:1204-22.
28. Kreif N, Grieve R, Radice R, Sadique Z, Ramsahai R, Sekhon JS. Methods for estimating subgroup effects in cost-effectiveness analyses that use observational data. Med Decis Making 2012 16/10/12. http://mdm.sagepub.com/ content/early/2012/06/11/0272989X12448929.
29. Radice R, Ramsahai R, Grieve R, Kreif N, Sadique Z, Sekhon JS. Evaluating treatment effectiveness in patient subgroups: a comparison of propensity score methods with an automated matching approach. Int J Biostat 2012;8:article 25.
30. Diamond A, Sekhon JS. Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: a general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. review of economics and statistics. 2012. www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/ abs/10.1162/REST-a-00318.
31. Fryback D, Hanmer J, eds. Do large national surveys yield equivalent population norms for health related quality of life measures? Society for Medical Decision Making, 2005; San Fransisco, CA.
32. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011;30:377-99.
33. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom AW. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 2012;379:1199-204.
34. Fevang B-TS, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O. Improved results of primary total hip replacement. Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987-2007. Acta Orthopaedica 2010;81:649-59.
35. Ng CY, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ. Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement. A five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:868-73.
36. Davies C, Briggs A, Lorgelly P, Garellick G, Malchau H. The 'hazards' of extrapolating survival curves. Presented at Health Economics Study Group meeting, Sheffield, UK, 2009.