Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery (REALISE): Design of a randomised controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Oosterhuis, Teddy ^a,e   Van Tulder, Maurits ^a,b,e   Peul, Wilco ^c,d   Bosmans, Judith ^a,e   Vleggeert Lankamp, Carmen ^c   Smakman, Lidwien ^c   Arts, Mark ^d   Ostelo, Raymond ^a,b,e  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d MEDICAL CENTER HAAGLANDEN   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Economic evaluation; Exercise; Lumbar disc herniation; Lumbar disc surgery; Physiotherapy; Randomised controlled trial; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EXERCISE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GLOBAL PERCEIVED RECOVERY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; LUMBAR DISC SURGERY; LUMBAR DISK HERNIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CARE; RETURN TO WORK; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FOLLOW UP; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; PATHOLOGY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875825714     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-124     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Peul WC, BMJ 2007 334 7607 1313 1317 10.1136/bmj.39223.428495.BE 17585160
2. Health Council of the Netherlands, Management of Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome (sciatica) The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands 1999
3. van Beek E, Lemmens K, van Schooten G, Vlieger EJ, Reduceren van praktijkvariatie: budgettaire effecten van scherpere indicatiestelling Breukelen: Plexus 2010
4. Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA, N Engl J Med 1999 340 418 423 10.1056/NEJM199902113400602 9971865
5. Consensus summary of the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Andersson GB, Brown MD, Dvorak J, Herzog RJ, Kambin P, Malter A, McCulloch JA, Saal JA, Spratt KF, Weinstein JN, Spine 1996 21 Suppl 75S 78S 10.1097/00007632-199612151-00009 9112328
6. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006 31 23 2707 2714
7. An international comparison of back surgery rates. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bush T, Waddell G, Spine 1994 19 1201 1206 10.1097/00007632- 199405310-00001 8073310
8. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Hanscom B, Skinner JS, Abdu WA, Hilibrand AS, Boden SD, Deyo RA, JAMA 2006 296 20 2441 2450 10.1001/jama.296.20.2441 17119140
9. Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group.: Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW, N Engl J Med 2007 356 22 2245 2256 10.1056/NEJMoa064039 17538084
10. Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, Ramirez A, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006 31 24 890-7
11. Epidural steroid following discectomy for herniated lumbar disc reduces neurological impairment and enhances recovery: a randomized study with two-year follow-up. Rasmussen S, Krum-Møller DS, Lauridsen LR, Jensen SE, Mandøe H, Gerlif C, Kehlet H, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008 33 19 2028 2033 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181833903
12. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008 33 9 931 939 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7
13. Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, Koes BW, Bartels RH, Bartels RH, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (SIPS), JAMA 2009 302 2 149 158 10.1001/jama.2009.972 19584344
14. The development of a screening instrument to select patients at risk of residual complaints after lumbar disc surgery. den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Evers AW, Beems T, Borm GF, Munneke M, Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010 46 4 497 503 20639806
15. Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study (SIPS) Group: Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in the Netherlands: a survey among spine surgeons. Arts MP, Peul WC, Koes BW, Thomeer RT, J Neurosurg Spine 2008 9 1 32 39 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/032 18590408
16. National audit of post-operative management in spinal surgery. McGregor AH, Dicken B, Jamrozik K, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006 7 47 10.1186/1471-2474-7-47 16737522
17. A survey of post-operative management for patients following first time lumbar discectomy. Williamson E, White L, Rushton A, Eur Spine J 2007 16 6 795 802 10.1007/s00586-006-0207-8 16944223
18. Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. Ostelo RWJG, Costa LOP, Maher CG, de Vet HCW, Van Tulder MW, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 4 D003007 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub2 18843637
19. Function after spinal treatment, exercise, and rehabilitation: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized controlled trial. Morris S, Morris TP, McGregor AH, Doré CJ, Jamrozik K, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 36 21 1807 1814 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821cba1f
20. CBO, Richtlijn Lumbosacraal Radiculair Syndroom Utrecht: CBO 2008
21. A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers AW, Eur Spine J 2006 15 5 527 536 10.1007/s00586-005-0910- x 15915334
22. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Bombardier C, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25 24 3100 3103 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00003
23. The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery. Little DG, MacDonald D, Spine 1994 19 2139 2143 10.1097/00007632-199410000-00001 7809744
24. The Oswestry Disability Index. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25 22 2940 2952 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
25. Studies with pain rating scales. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA, Ann Rheum Dis 1978 37 4 378 381 10.1136/ard.37.4.378 686873
26. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 30 11 1331 1334 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29
27. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A, Med Care 1995 33 4 Suppl S264 AS279 7723455
28. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Luo X, Lynn George M, Kakouras I, Edwards CL, Pietrobon R, Richardson W, Hey L, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28 15 1739 1745
29. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group, Health Policy 1990 16 3 199 208 10109801
30. Health-related quality of life assessment by the EuroQol-5D can provide cost-utility data in the field of low-back surgery. Solberg TK, Olsen JA, Ingebrigtsen T, Hofoss D, Nygaard OP, Eur Spine J 2005 14 10 1000 1007 10.1007/s00586-005-0898-2 15843969
31. Kwaliteit van leven meten in economische evaluaties: het Nederlands EQ-5D-tarief (Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff). Lamers LM, Stalmeier PF, McDonnell J, Krabbe PF, van Busschbach JJ, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005 149 1574 1578 16038162
32. PRODISQ: a modular questionnaire on productivity and disease for economic evaluation studies. Koopmanschap MA, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2005 5 23 28 10.1586/14737167.5.1.23 19807557
33. Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Tan SS, Bouwmans CAM, Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek. Methoden en standaardkostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg, Geactualiseerde versie 2010 College voor zorgverzekeringen 2010
34. The fristion cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF, van Inneveld BM, van Roijen L, J Health Econ 1995 14 2 171 189 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00044-5 10154656
35. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD, J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2000 31 2 73 86 10.1016/S0005-7916(00)00012-4 11132119
36. Treatment expectancy and credibility are associated with the outcome of both physical and cognitive-behavioral treatment in chronic low back pain. Smeets RJ, Beelen S, Goossens ME, Schouten EG, Knottnerus JA, Vlaeyen JW, Clin J Pain 2008 24 4 305 315 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318164aa75 18427229
37. Can we screen for problematic back pain? a screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Linton SJ, Hallden K, Clin J Pain 1998 14 209 215 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00007 9758070
38. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Linton SJ, Boersma K, Clin J Pain 2003 19 2 80 86 10.1097/00002508-200303000-00002 12616177
39. A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Hockings RL, McAuley JH, Maher CG, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008 33 15 494 E500 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817ba3bb
40. Measuring psychosocial variables in patients with (sub) acute low back pain complaints, at risk for chronicity: a validation study of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version. Heneweer H, van Woudenberg NJ, van Genderen F, Vanhees L, Wittink H, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35 4 447 452 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bd9e3b
41. A Fear- Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ, Pain 1993 52 157 168 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B 8455963
42. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself. Evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R, Pain 1999 80 329 339 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00229-2 10204746
43. Pain-coping strategies in chronic pain patients: psychometric characteristics of the pain-coping inventory (PCI). Kraaimaat FW, Evers AW, Int J Behav Med 2003 10 4 343 363 10.1207/S15327558IJBM1004-5 14734263
44. van Buuren S, Oudshoorn CGM, Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations Leiden: TNO 2000