Power spectra of the natural input to the visual system

Vision Research

Volumn 83, Issue , 2013, Pages 66-75

  Pamplona, D ^a   Triesch, J ^a   Rothkopf, C A ^a,b  

^a FRANKFURT INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Natural image statistics; Natural vision; Orientation; Power spectrum

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHOTOGRAPHY; POWER SPECTRUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETINA FOVEA; SENSORY SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VAN HATEREN DATABASE; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84875797036     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 1954, 61:183-193.
2. Baddeley R. The correlational structure of natural images and the calibration of spatial representations. Cognitive Science 1997, 21(3):351-371.
3. Balboa R.M., Grzywacz N.M. Power spectra and distribution of contrasts of natural images power spectra and distribution of contrasts of natural images from different habitats. Vision Research 2003, 43:2527-2537.
4. Balboa R., Tyler C., Grzywacz N. Occlusions contribute to scaling in natural images. Vision Research 2001, 41(7):955-964.
5. Ballard D. Animate vision. Artificial Intelligence Journal 1991, 48:57-86.
6. Barlow H. Sensory communication. Ch. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages 1961, 217-234. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
7. Bruce N.D., Tsotsos J.K. A statistical basis for visual field anisotropies. Neurocomputing 2006, 69(10-12):1301-1304. [Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research 2006].
8. Burge J., Geisler W. Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011, 108(40):16849-16854.
9. Burton G., Moorhead I. Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. Applied Optics 1987, 26(1):157-170.
10. Carathéodory C. Conformal representation 1998, Dover Publications.
11. Carlson C. Thresholds for perceived image sharpness. Photographic Science and Engineering 1978, 22:69-71.
12. Coletta V.P Physics fundamentals 2010, Physics Curriculum and Instruction. 2nd ed.
13. Coppola D., Purves H., McCoy A., Purves D. The distribution of oriented contours in the real world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1998, 95(7):4002.
14. Daugman J. Entropy reduction and decorrelation in visual coding by oriented neural receptive fields. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1989, 36(1):107-114.
15. Deriugin N. The power spectrum and the correlation function of the television signal. Telecommunications 1956, 1(7):1-12.
16. Doi E., Inui T., Lee T., Wachtler T., Sejnowski T. Spatiochromatic receptive field properties derived from information-theoretic analyses of cone mosaic responses to natural scenes. Neural Computation 2003, 15(2):397-417.
17. Emsley H. Visual optics 1948, Vol. 1. Hatton Press. 5th ed.
18. Evans M., Hastings N., Peacock B. Statistical distributions 2000, Wiley, Ch. von Mises Distribution. 3rd ed.
19. Field D.J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1987, 4(12):2379-2394.
20. Geisler W. Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:167-192.
21. Geisler W., Perry J. Contour statistics in natural images: Grouping across occlusions. Visual Neuroscience 2009, 26(01):109-121.
22. Hecht E. Optics 2001, Addison Wesley. 4th ed.
23. Kersten D. Predictability and redundancy of natural images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1987, 4(12):2395-2400.
24. Land M., Nilsson D. Animal eyes 2002, Oxford University Press.
25. -α scaling in natural image spectra. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2000, 17(1):28-33.
26. Lee A., Mumford D., Huang J. Occlusion models for natural images: A statistical study of a scale-invariant dead leaves model. International Journal of Computer Vision 2001, 41(1):35-59.
27. Matheron G. Random sets and integral geometry. Vol. 261 1975, Wiley, New York.
28. Navarro R., Artal P., Williams D. Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1993, 10(2):201-212.
29. Oliva A., Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision 2001, 42(3):145-175.
30. Reinagel P., Zador A.M. Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. Network: Computations in Neural Systems 1999, 10:341-350.
31. Rothkopf C., Ballard D. Image statistics at the point of gaze during human navigation. Visual Neuroscience 2009, 26(01):81-92.
32. Rothkopf, C., Weisswange, T., Triesch, J., 2009. Learning independent causes in natural images explains the spacevariant oblique effect. In IEEE 8th International Conference on Development and Learning. IEEE.
33. Ruderman D. The statistics of natural images. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 1994, 5(4):517-548.
34. Ruderman D. Origins of scaling in natural images. Vision Research 1997, 37(23):3385-3398.
35. Ruderman D., Bialek W. Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Physical Review Letters 1994, 73(6):814-817.
36. Shannon C. The mathematical theory of communication: 1963. MD Computing Computers in Medical Practice 1948, 14(4):306-317.
37. Simoncelli E.P., Olshausen B.A. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2001, 24:1193-1216.
38. Tkačik G., Garrigan P., Ratliff C., Milčinski G., Klein J., Seyfarth L., et al. Natural images from the birthplace of the human eye. PloS One 2011, 6(6):e20409.
39. Tolhurst D., Tadmor Y., Chao T. Amplitude spectra of natural images. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 1992, 12(2):229-232.
40. van der Schaaf A., van Hateren J. Modelling the power spectra of natural images: Statistics and information. Vision Research 1996, 36(17):2759-2770.
41. van Hateren J., van der Schaaf A. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 1998, 265:359-366.